Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 11:16 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I like "fetching" or "retrieving" for
>> the activity of getting a WAL segment from an archive, because in cases
>> where the activity takes long enough to be noticeable, it's probably
>> because you are
On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 11:16 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 10:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Perhaps "fetching XXX" vs "restoring XXX"?
>
> > Not sure if I read you right, so one more time for clarity:
>
> > IMHO wording should be
> >
Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 10:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Perhaps "fetching XXX" vs "restoring XXX"?
> Not sure if I read you right, so one more time for clarity:
> IMHO wording should be
> "restoring X" before we send to archive to get file (archive only)
On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 10:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Perhaps "fetching XXX" vs "restoring XXX"?
Not sure if I read you right, so one more time for clarity:
IMHO wording should be
"restoring X" before we send to archive to get file (archive only)
"recovering X" once we have the file (archive
On Sun, 2007-09-30 at 10:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sat, 2007-09-29 at 14:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Hmm, not right there, because we don't know that the file actually
> >> exists yet. Applied with modifications ...
>
> > Double hmmm, that means
Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 2007-09-29 at 14:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hmm, not right there, because we don't know that the file actually
>> exists yet. Applied with modifications ...
> Double hmmm, that means when we are waiting for file X in pg_standby the
> ps display
On Sat, 2007-09-29 at 14:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Small patch to set ps display during recovery, so we can see the current
> > WAL file being processed in both crash and archive recovery.
>
> Hmm, not right there, because we don't know that the file a
Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Small patch to set ps display during recovery, so we can see the current
> WAL file being processed in both crash and archive recovery.
Hmm, not right there, because we don't know that the file actually
exists yet. Applied with modifications ...
Small patch to set ps display during recovery, so we can see the current
WAL file being processed in both crash and archive recovery.
Very simple patch, but useful. Tested.
--
Simon Riggs
2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
Index: src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c
===
