Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Updated patch. Fixed a few minor things, added documentation and regression
> tests. Unfortunately I can't test the regression tests because I get a
> segmentation fault earlier in the same file due to a GIN index build. So I
> haven't updated the "expected"
Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just remembered one open question I had. I'm not clear what to do with the
> index statistics. It may be that the current code is basically the right thing
> -- it leaves the statistics as they are after phase 1, ie after the regular
> index build before we
Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Updated patch. Fixed a few minor things, added documentation and
> > > regression
> > > tests. Unfortunately I can't test the regression tests because I get a
> > >
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Updated patch. Fixed a few minor things, added documentation and regression
> > tests. Unfortunately I can't test the regression tests because I get a
> > segmentation fault earlier in the same file due to a GIN inde
Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Updated patch. Fixed a few minor things, added documentation and regression
> tests. Unfortunately I can't test the regression tests because I get a
> segmentation fault earlier in the same file due to a GIN index build. So I
> haven't updated the "expected"
Still discussion about keyword use.
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
---
