Follow-up to a question from Bruce on the phone, re: the open server patch
2nd to follow.
Kean has graciously agreed to answer questions if y'all need them answered.
LER
Forwarded Message
Date: Friday, July 18, 2003 23:24:47 -0700
From: Kean Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
2nd followup from Kean.
LER
Forwarded Message
Date: Friday, July 18, 2003 23:43:55 -0700
From: Kean Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Subject: Re: PG Patch
Larry Rosenman wrote:
I got a question from the PG Core Team (Bruce Momjian)
More on the shared lib stuff.
I'd LIKE to get a discussion of this (after just talking to Bruce on the
phone).
If I need to repost Kean's comments to -HACKERS, let me know.
LER
Forwarded Message
Date: Saturday, July 19, 2003 13:50:55 -0700
From: Kean Johnston <[EMAIL
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
---
Joe Conway wrote:
> I'm going to resend t
Forwarded Message
Date: Saturday, July 19, 2003 16:10:36 -0700
From: Kean Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Subject: Re: PG Patch
I'm trying to get a discussion going, as Bruce wants to do it right for
ALL platforms or none. It prob
Tom Lane wrote:
> This reminds me, someone (Barry?) was griping that SHOW DATESTYLE
> doesn't produce a value that SET DATESTYLE will take. Did we agree
> that it was OK to change the output to look like "ISO, US" etc?
Is this a TODO?
--
Bruce Momjian| http://candle.p
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
---
Joe Conway wrote:
> I'm going to resend t
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
---
Rod Taylor wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
---
Rod Taylor wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed
Great. Please send over the file as an attachment and I will see that
it is added, or even better, use diff -c against the 7.3.2 version and
your new version so we can see the changes.
---
Böjthe Zoltán wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
---
Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
[ There is tex
Sorry I am getting to this patch late. I know you posted a newer
version, but this one has a better description.
I am uncertain if we are over-engineering the interface by having three
ways to control the output. Is that valuable? If it is, fine, but if
it isn't, the extra code just adds to con
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
---
sumit wrote:
>
> As per the sugges
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> This reminds me, someone (Barry?) was griping that SHOW DATESTYLE
>> doesn't produce a value that SET DATESTYLE will take. Did we agree
>> that it was OK to change the output to look like "ISO, US" etc?
> Is this a TODO?
No, it's a D
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
---
Jon Jensen wrote:
> Hi.
>
> This is a re
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours.
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ There is text
add clock_timestamp() and transaction_timestamp() function
see TODO list get more
-
diff -u -r ../cvs/pgsql/src/backend/utils/adt/timestamp.c
../pgsql/src/backend/utils/adt/timestamp.c
--- ../cvs/pgsql/src/backend/utils/adt/timesta
Oh, I see now. My new 'make check' script doesn't install a new version
in my standard path but just in the regression database.
I see what you see now.
---
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > T
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> No, it's a DONE.
> I just tried this with CVS:
> test=> show datestyle;
> DateStyle
> ---
>ISO with US (NonEuropean) conventions
> (1 row)
Uh,
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> This reminds me, someone (Barry?) was griping that SHOW DATESTYLE
> >> doesn't produce a value that SET DATESTYLE will take. Did we agree
> >> that it was OK to change the output to look like "ISO, US" etc?
>
> >
20 matches
Mail list logo
