Bruce Momjian wrote:
Neil, I have added these item to the TODO list. Do you plan on applying
this?
No, I don't have any immediate plans to apply it, as unfortunately I
didn't see a performance win :-( It's also possible I'm just not
measuring the right workload, although I don't have time to
On Friday 27 May 2005 20:45, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 04:16:15PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> There seems to be a distinct lack of unanimity about that judgment ;-)
> >
> > Well, yes, _across Postgres hackers_. But if we were to ask
>
Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm not against the idea of a config variable, but this is what, the
> third or fourth go around on this? It seems rather unfair to put this
> burden upon the current patch writer at this stage of the game...
The fact that objections keep being raised sh
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The patch does two things: (1) change hash indexes to only store the
> key's hash value, not the entire key (2) store index elements within a
> hash bucket in order of hash key and search for matches via binary
> search. #1 is definitely a win in some in
On Saturday 28 May 2005 11:12, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Treat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm not against the idea of a config variable, but this is what, the
> > third or fourth go around on this? It seems rather unfair to put this
> > burden upon the current patch writer at this stage of the
Here is an updated version of the COPY \x patch. It is the first patch
attached.
Also, I realized that if we support \x in COPY, we should also support
\x in strings to the backend. This is the second patch.
Third, I found out that psql has some unusual handling of escaped
numbers. Instead of
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Here is an updated version of the COPY \x patch. It is the first patch
> attached.
> Also, I realized that if we support \x in COPY, we should also support
> \x in strings to the backend. This is the second patch.
Do we really want to do any of these things? We've been
