Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] UTF8 or Unicode

2005-03-02 Thread Markus Bertheau ☭
, 26/02/2005 15:50 -0500, Bruce Momjian : Other than that the other conversion files were already named fine, e.g. ascii_to_utf_8 (no UNICODE), however it is utf_8 and not utf8. I am unsure how to handle these. General remark about the spelling of this encoding: The correct encoding name

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] UTF8 or Unicode

2005-03-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
Markus Bertheau ? wrote: ? ???, 26/02/2005 ? 15:50 -0500, Bruce Momjian ?: Other than that the other conversion files were already named fine, e.g. ascii_to_utf_8 (no UNICODE), however it is utf_8 and not utf8. I am unsure how to handle these. General remark about the spelling of

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] UTF8 or Unicode

2005-03-02 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes: The correct encoding name is UTF-8. True, but Peter says the ANSI standard calls it UTF8 so that's what I used. What SQL99 actually says is - UTF8 specifies the name of a character repertoire that consists of every character

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] UTF8 or Unicode

2005-02-27 Thread lsunley
The routines that do the conversion could have alternate names specified in the conversion_create.sql. There is not reason that I can see why you cannot have two function names pointing to the same routine. like CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION ascii_to_mic (INTEGER, INTEGER, CSTRING, CSTRING,

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] UTF8 or Unicode

2005-02-27 Thread lsunley
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/26/05 at 11:09 PM, Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us said: Here is an updated version that handles all cases. It does rename the routine names so the primary encoding name is used for the routine names. This will be documented in the release notes if anyone

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] UTF8 or Unicode

2005-02-27 Thread lsunley
Ignore previous e-mail... Missed the patch to the makefile Sorry about that -- --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- ---(end of broadcast)---

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] UTF8 or Unicode

2005-02-26 Thread Bruce Momjian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/26/05 at 07:55 PM, Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us said: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Further to my earlier e-mail, there would have to be two lines added to conversion_create.sql for each alternate function name Like:

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] UTF8 or Unicode

2005-02-26 Thread lsunley
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/26/05 at 07:55 PM, Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us said: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Further to my earlier e-mail, there would have to be two lines added to conversion_create.sql for each alternate function name Like: CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] UTF8 or Unicode

2005-02-26 Thread Bruce Momjian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Further to my earlier e-mail, there would have to be two lines added to conversion_create.sql for each alternate function name Like: CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION ascii_to_whatever (INTEGER, INTEGER, CSTRING, CSTRING, INTEGER) RETURNS VOID AS '$libdir/ascmic',

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] UTF8 or Unicode

2005-02-26 Thread lsunley
Further to my earlier e-mail, there would have to be two lines added to conversion_create.sql for each alternate function name Like: CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION ascii_to_whatever (INTEGER, INTEGER, CSTRING, CSTRING, INTEGER) RETURNS VOID AS '$libdir/ascmic', 'ascii_to_mic' LANGUAGE 'c' STRICT;