Re: [PATCHES] Server instrumentation: pg_terminate_backend, pg_reload_conf

2005-06-07 Thread Andreas Pflug
Bruce Momjian wrote: Andreas Pflug wrote: Bruce Momjian wrote: Andreas Pflug wrote: This patch reenables pg_terminate_backend, allowing (superuser only, of course) to terminate a backend. As taken from the discussion some weeks earlier, SIGTERM seems to be used quite widely, without a

Re: [PATCHES] Server instrumentation: pg_terminate_backend, pg_reload_conf

2005-06-06 Thread Bruce Momjian
Andreas Pflug wrote: Bruce Momjian wrote: Andreas Pflug wrote: This patch reenables pg_terminate_backend, allowing (superuser only, of course) to terminate a backend. As taken from the discussion some weeks earlier, SIGTERM seems to be used quite widely, without a report of

Re: [PATCHES] Server instrumentation: pg_terminate_backend, pg_reload_conf

2005-06-04 Thread Bruce Momjian
Andreas Pflug wrote: This patch reenables pg_terminate_backend, allowing (superuser only, of course) to terminate a backend. As taken from the discussion some weeks earlier, SIGTERM seems to be used quite widely, without a report of misbehavior so while the code path is officially not too

[PATCHES] Server instrumentation: pg_terminate_backend, pg_reload_conf

2005-06-01 Thread Andreas Pflug
This patch reenables pg_terminate_backend, allowing (superuser only, of course) to terminate a backend. As taken from the discussion some weeks earlier, SIGTERM seems to be used quite widely, without a report of misbehaviour so while the code path is officially not too well tested, in practice