[PATCHES] There are any version that works on Windows 2000

2004-11-21 Thread ctnan
There is no way to install "PostgreSQL 8.0.0 Beta4" and any other version in my windows 2000. No matter what user i use or any kind of configuration option combination it's allways the same. I start the instalation and in the moment that the instalation said: #

Re: [PATCHES] Unicode characters above 0x10000 #2

2004-11-21 Thread John Hansen
Updated patch, Disregard old one, it broke ucs2. ... John cvs.diff Description: cvs.diff ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html

Re: [PATCHES] Unicode characters above 0x10000 #2

2004-11-21 Thread John Hansen
3 times lucky? Last one broke utf8 G This one works, Too tired, sorry for the inconvenience.. ... John cvs.diff Description: cvs.diff ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your

Re: [PATCHES] There are any version that works on Windows 2000

2004-11-21 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 03:36:30PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > There is no way to install "PostgreSQL 8.0.0 Beta4" and any other version > in my windows 2000. No matter what user i use or any kind of configuration > option combination it's allways the same. There is certainly lots of people

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] New compile warnings

2004-11-21 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I am seeing the following compile warnings in CVS. I am using for perl: Summary of my perl5 (5.0 patchlevel 5 subversion 3) configuration: I believe these two: plperl.c:948: warning: `ret_hv' might be used uninitialized in this

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] New compile warnings

2004-11-21 Thread Tom Lane
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't currently have the resources to clean this up properly. The > attached patch tries to make clear in a comment what the code is doing, > and also initializes these variables to NULL. If someone wants to take a > stab at cleaning this up they ar

[PATCHES] Archiver restart timer

2004-11-21 Thread Simon Riggs
I enclose a short patch to reduce the PGARCH_RESTART_INTERVAL from 60 seconds to 10 seconds. The original number was plucked from thin air some months ago, and I'd like to review that now based upon further thought, observation and experience. This change has little or no effect on performance, si

[PATCHES] SQL Conformance introductory section

2004-11-21 Thread Simon Riggs
I've re-written the start of the SQL Conformance section to update things for the SQL2003 standard. This is intended to be applied alongside Troels Arvin's patch, though can be applied without it also. I've not reviewed Troels' patch in detail yet. -- Best Regards, Simon Riggs Index: features.sg

[PATCHES] pgcrypto: Makefile check

2004-11-21 Thread Neil Conway
This patch makes the pgcrypto Makefile check that a recognized random source has been defined. If no such source is defined, pgcrypto will compile successfully but will be unusable. (An alternative place to do the check would be in random.c; comments on which location is preferrable are welcome.)

[PATCHES] release.sgml refers to g_restore

2004-11-21 Thread Michael Fuhr
The 8.0.0beta5 Release Notes contain a reference to g_restore instead of pg_restore. -- Michael Fuhr http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/ Index: doc/src/sgml/release.sgml === RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/release.sgml,v retri

Re: [PATCHES] release.sgml refers to g_restore

2004-11-21 Thread Neil Conway
On Sun, 2004-11-21 at 22:49 -0700, Michael Fuhr wrote: > The 8.0.0beta5 Release Notes contain a reference to g_restore instead > of pg_restore. Applied. Thanks! -Neil ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

Re: [PATCHES] Archiver restart timer

2004-11-21 Thread Simon Riggs
On Sun, 2004-11-21 at 23:07, Simon Riggs wrote: > I enclose a short patch to reduce the PGARCH_RESTART_INTERVAL from 60 > seconds to 10 seconds. The original number was plucked from thin air > some months ago, and I'd like to review that now based upon further > thought, observation and experience.