Bruce Momjian wrote:
Andreas Pflug wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Andreas Pflug wrote:
This patch reenables pg_terminate_backend, allowing (superuser only, of
course) to terminate a backend. As taken from the discussion some weeks
earlier, SIGTERM seems to be used quite widely, without a rep
Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Andreas Pflug wrote:
> >
> >>This patch reenables pg_terminate_backend, allowing (superuser only, of
> >>course) to terminate a backend. As taken from the discussion some weeks
> >>earlier, SIGTERM seems to be used quite widely, without a report of
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Andreas Pflug wrote:
This patch reenables pg_terminate_backend, allowing (superuser only, of
course) to terminate a backend. As taken from the discussion some weeks
earlier, SIGTERM seems to be used quite widely, without a report of
misbehavior so while the code path is o
Andreas Pflug wrote:
> This patch reenables pg_terminate_backend, allowing (superuser only, of
> course) to terminate a backend. As taken from the discussion some weeks
> earlier, SIGTERM seems to be used quite widely, without a report of
> misbehavior so while the code path is officially not to
This patch reenables pg_terminate_backend, allowing (superuser only, of
course) to terminate a backend. As taken from the discussion some weeks
earlier, SIGTERM seems to be used quite widely, without a report of
misbehaviour so while the code path is officially not too well tested,
in practice
