Kris Jurka wrote:
I've attached two new patches. One revising my original patch to
make the function creations consistent and the other to just fix the
problem in the existing code (which should be backported as far as people
would like to).
Full patch applied to HEAD, fix for STRICT applied to 8.
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> ISTM that given how soundex-specific this function is it should have a
> less generic name than "difference".
>
> soundex_difference maybe?
>
Maybe, but difference is the name used by ms-sql, and it is also has
the same meaning in the ODBC/JDBC e
Kris Jurka wrote:
The attached patch implements the soundex difference function which
compares two strings' soundex values for similarity.
ISTM that given how soundex-specific this function is it should have a
less generic name than "difference".
soundex_difference maybe?
cheers
andrew
---
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005, Neil Conway wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 01:13 -0500, Kris Jurka wrote:
> > The attached patch implements the soundex difference function which
> > compares two strings' soundex values for similarity.
>
> *** 19,24
> --- 19,28
> AS 'MODULE_PATHNAME', 'soundex
