[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I try to adjust my server for a couple of weeks with some sucess but it still
slow when the server has stress in the moring from many connection . I used
postgresql 7.3.2-1 with RH 9 on a mechine of 2 Xeon 3.0 Ghz and ram of 4 Gb.
Since 1 1/2 yr. when I started to use the
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 09:54:32AM +0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
postgresql 7.3.2-1 with RH 9 on a mechine of 2 Xeon 3.0 Ghz and ram of 4 Gb.
You may want to try disabling hyperthreading, if you don't mind
rebooting.
grew up to 3.5 Gb and there were more than 160 concurent connections.
The common wisdom of shared buffers is around 6-10% of available memory.
Your proposal below is about 50% of memory.
I'm not sure what the original numbers actually meant, they are quite large.
also effective cache is the sum of kernel buffers + shared_buffers so it
should be bigger than shared
The common wisdom of shared buffers is around 6-10% of available memory.
Your proposal below is about 50% of memory.
I'm not sure what the original numbers actually meant, they are quite large.
I will try to reduce shared buffer to 1536 [1.87 Mb].
also effective cache is the sum of kernel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
max_connections = 160
shared_buffers = 2048[Total = 2.5 Gb.]
sort_mem = 8192 [Total = 1280 Mb.]
vacuum_mem = 16384
effective_cache_size = 128897 [= 1007 Mb. = 1 Gb. ]
Will it be more suitable for my server than before?
I would keep shared_buffers in the
