Re: [PERFORM] failures on machines using jfs

2004-01-13 Thread Greg Spiegelberg
Hannu Krosing wrote: Greg Spiegelberg kirjutas E, 12.01.2004 kell 19:03: Hannu Krosing wrote: Spiegelberg, Greg kirjutas P, 11.01.2004 kell 18:21: It would seem we're experiencing somthing similiar with our scratch volume (JFS mounted with noatime). Which files/directories do you keep on "scr

Re: [PERFORM] failures on machines using jfs

2004-01-13 Thread Bill Moran
Hannu Krosing wrote: Greg Spiegelberg kirjutas E, 12.01.2004 kell 19:03: Hannu Krosing wrote: Spiegelberg, Greg kirjutas P, 11.01.2004 kell 18:21: It would seem we're experiencing somthing similiar with our scratch volume (JFS mounted with noatime). Which files/directories do you keep on "scr

Re: [PERFORM] failures on machines using jfs

2004-01-13 Thread Hannu Krosing
Greg Spiegelberg kirjutas E, 12.01.2004 kell 19:03: > Hannu Krosing wrote: > > Spiegelberg, Greg kirjutas P, 11.01.2004 kell 18:21: > > > >>It would seem we're experiencing somthing similiar with our scratch > >>volume (JFS mounted with noatime). > > > > > > Which files/directories do you keep o

Re: [PERFORM] failures on machines using jfs

2004-01-12 Thread Greg Spiegelberg
Hannu Krosing wrote: Spiegelberg, Greg kirjutas P, 11.01.2004 kell 18:21: It would seem we're experiencing somthing similiar with our scratch volume (JFS mounted with noatime). Which files/directories do you keep on "scratch" volume ? All postgres files or just some (WAL, tmp) ? No Postgres fil

Re: [PERFORM] failures on machines using jfs

2004-01-12 Thread Hannu Krosing
Spiegelberg, Greg kirjutas P, 11.01.2004 kell 18:21: > It would seem we're experiencing somthing similiar with our scratch > volume (JFS mounted with noatime). Which files/directories do you keep on "scratch" volume ? All postgres files or just some (WAL, tmp) ? - Hannu ---

Re: [PERFORM] failures on machines using jfs

2004-01-11 Thread Tom Lane
"Spiegelberg, Greg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > PostgreSQL 7.3.3 from source *Please* update to 7.3.4 or 7.3.5 before you get bitten by the WAL-page-boundary bug ... regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't

Re: [PERFORM] failures on machines using jfs

2004-01-11 Thread Spiegelberg, Greg
ECC Internal disk: 2xU160 SCSI, mirrored, location of our JFS file system External disk Qlogic 2310 attached to FC-SW @2Gbps with ext3 on those LUNs Greg -Original Message- From: Christopher Browne To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 1/10/04 9:08 PM Subject: Re: [PERFORM] failures on machine

Re: [PERFORM] failures on machines using jfs

2004-01-10 Thread Christopher Browne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert Creager) writes: > When grilled further on (Wed, 7 Jan 2004 18:06:08 -0500), > Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> confessed: > >> We have lately had a couple of cases where machines either locked >> up, slowed down to the point of complete unusability, or died >> complete

Re: [PERFORM] failures on machines using jfs

2004-01-09 Thread Robert Creager
When grilled further on (Wed, 7 Jan 2004 18:06:08 -0500), Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> confessed: > > We have lately had a couple of cases where machines either locked up, > slowed down to the point of complete unusability, or died completely > while using jfs. We are _not_ sure that jfs

Re: [PERFORM] failures on machines using jfs

2004-01-08 Thread Josh Berkus
Andrew, > None of this is to say that jfs is in fact to blame, nor even that, > if it is, it does not have something to do with the age of our > installations, &c. (these are all RH 8). In fact, I suspect hardware > in both cases. But I thought I'd mention it just in case other > people are seei