Hi,
This looks very interesting. I'll give it a better look and see if the
performance penalties pgpool brings are not substantial in which case
this program could be very helpful,
Thanks for the hint,
Slavisa
On 4/14/05, Richard Huxton wrote:
> Slavisa Garic wrote:
> > Thi
ir data to
> a broker, which could then implement connection pooling.
>
> -- Mark Lewis
>
> On Tue, 2005-04-12 at 22:09, Slavisa Garic wrote:
> > This is a serious problem for me as there are multiple users using our
> > software on our server and I would want to
ilure to connect could mean a loss of
computation results that were gathered over long periods of time.
Thanks for the help by the way :),
Regards,
Slavisa
On 12 Apr 2005 23:27:09 -0400, Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >
Hi all,
I've just noticed an interesting behaviour with PGSQL. My software is
made up of few different modules that interact through PGSQL database.
Almost every query they do is an individual transaction and there is a
good reason for that. After every query done there is some processing
done by
Thanks for the reply and thanks even more for the good one :).
Cheers,
Slavisa
On Fri, 6 Feb 2004, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > I have a quick question. In order to speed up insertion of large number of
> > rows (100s of thousands) I replaced the INSERT with the COPY. This works
> > fine b
Hi,
I have a quick question. In order to speed up insertion of large number of
rows (100s of thousands) I replaced the INSERT with the COPY. This works
fine but one question popped into my mind. Does copy updates indexes on
that table if there are some defined?
Thanks,
Slavisa
Does VACUUM ANALYZE help with the analysis or it also speeds up the
process. I know i could try that before I ask but experiment is running
now and I am too curious to wait :),
Anyway thanks for the hint,
Slavisa
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, George Essig wrote:
> Slavisa Garic wrote:
>
> >
Hi Everyone,
I am using PostgreSQL 7.3.2 and have used earlier versions (7.1.x onwards)
and with all of them I noticed same problem with INSERTs when there is a
large data set. Just to so you guys can compare time it takes to insert
one row into a table when there are only few rows present and w
