On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 11:25:02PM -0700, tobbe wrote:
Hi Chris.
Thanks for the answer.
Sorry that i was a bit unclear.
1) We update around 20.000 posts per night.
Doesn't seem like a lot at all.
2) What i meant was that we suspect that the DBMS called PervasiveSQL
that we are using
tobbe wrote:
Hi Chris.
Thanks for the answer.
Sorry that i was a bit unclear.
1) We update around 20.000 posts per night.
2) What i meant was that we suspect that the DBMS called PervasiveSQL
that we are using today is much to small. That's why we're looking for
alternatives.
Today we base
Hi.
The company that I'm working for are surveying the djungle of DBMS
since we are due to implement the next generation of our system.
The companys buissnes is utilizing the DBMS to store data that are
accessed trough the web at daytime (only SELECTs, sometimes with joins,
etc). The data is a
Hi Chris.
Thanks for the answer.
Sorry that i was a bit unclear.
1) We update around 20.000 posts per night.
2) What i meant was that we suspect that the DBMS called PervasiveSQL
that we are using today is much to small. That's why we're looking for
alternatives.
Today we base our solution
tobbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Chris.
Thanks for the answer.
Sorry that i was a bit unclear.
1) We update around 20.000 posts per night.
No surprise there; I would have been surprised to see 100/nite or
6M/nite...
2) What i meant was that we suspect that the DBMS called PervasiveSQL
