One more point for your list:
Choose Slony if Replicator doesn't support your platform. :-)
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Vivek Khera, Ph.D.Khera Communications, Inc.
Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rockville, MD +1-301-869-4449
Once again, Joshua, would you please explain what you mean with
batch and live replication system? Slony does group multiple
master transactions into one replication transaction to improve
performance (fewer commits on the slaves). The interval of these
groups is configurable and for high
Centuries ago, Nostradamus foresaw when [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joshua D. Drake) would
write:
I hope you understand that I, in no way have ever suggested
(purposely) anything negative about Slony. Only that I believe they
serve different technical solutions.
Stipulating that I may have some bias
Christopher Browne wrote:
Centuries ago, Nostradamus foresaw when [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Joshua D. Drake") would write:
I hope you understand that I, in no way have ever suggested
(purposely) anything negative about Slony. Only that I believe they
serve different technical solutions.
Chris Cheston wrote:
HI all, I'm trying to implement a highly-scalable, high-performance,
real-time database replication system to back-up my Postgres database
as data gets written.
So far, Mammoth Replicator is looking pretty good but it costs $1000+ .
Yes but it includes 30 days of support and
