Re: [PERFORM] nice/low priority Query

2005-08-03 Thread Richard Huxton
Tobias Brox wrote: [Tobias Brox - Tue at 06:04:34PM +0200] (...) and at one point in the code I'm even asking the database for explain plan, grepping out the estimated cost number, and referring the user to take contact with the IT-dept if he really needs the report. But I digress. I just

Re: [PERFORM] Planner incorrectly choosing seq scan over index scan

2005-08-03 Thread Meetesh Karia
Btw - I tried playing around with some of the other planner cost constants but I wasn't able to get the planner to choose the index scan. It seems like the issue is that the estimated cost for fetching one row from the index (3.02) is a little high in my case. Is there any way that I can adjust

[PERFORM] Is There A Windows Version of Performance Tuning Documents?

2005-08-03 Thread Lane Van Ingen
I have in my possession some performance tuning documents authored by Bruce Momjian, Josh Berkus, and others. They give good information on utilities to use (like ipcs, sar, vmstat, etc) to evaluate disk, memory, etc. performance on Unix-based systems. Problem is, I have applications running on

Re: [PERFORM] Is There A Windows Version of Performance Tuning Documents?

2005-08-03 Thread John A Meinel
Lane Van Ingen wrote: I have in my possession some performance tuning documents authored by Bruce Momjian, Josh Berkus, and others. They give good information on utilities to use (like ipcs, sar, vmstat, etc) to evaluate disk, memory, etc. performance on Unix-based systems. Problem is, I