Greg Spiegelberg kirjutas E, 12.01.2004 kell 19:03:
Hannu Krosing wrote:
Spiegelberg, Greg kirjutas P, 11.01.2004 kell 18:21:
It would seem we're experiencing somthing similiar with our scratch
volume (JFS mounted with noatime).
Which files/directories do you keep on scratch volume
Hannu Krosing wrote:
Greg Spiegelberg kirjutas E, 12.01.2004 kell 19:03:
Hannu Krosing wrote:
Spiegelberg, Greg kirjutas P, 11.01.2004 kell 18:21:
It would seem we're experiencing somthing similiar with our scratch
volume (JFS mounted with noatime).
Which files/directories do you keep on
Hannu Krosing wrote:
Greg Spiegelberg kirjutas E, 12.01.2004 kell 19:03:
Hannu Krosing wrote:
Spiegelberg, Greg kirjutas P, 11.01.2004 kell 18:21:
It would seem we're experiencing somthing similiar with our scratch
volume (JFS mounted with noatime).
Which files/directories do you keep on
Spiegelberg, Greg kirjutas P, 11.01.2004 kell 18:21:
It would seem we're experiencing somthing similiar with our scratch
volume (JFS mounted with noatime).
Which files/directories do you keep on scratch volume ?
All postgres files or just some (WAL, tmp) ?
-
Hannu
Hannu Krosing wrote:
Spiegelberg, Greg kirjutas P, 11.01.2004 kell 18:21:
It would seem we're experiencing somthing similiar with our scratch
volume (JFS mounted with noatime).
Which files/directories do you keep on scratch volume ?
All postgres files or just some (WAL, tmp) ?
No Postgres
: 2xU160 SCSI, mirrored, location of our JFS file system
External disk Qlogic 2310 attached to FC-SW @2Gbps with ext3 on those LUNs
Greg
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Browne
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 1/10/04 9:08 PM
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] failures on machines using jfs
[EMAIL
Spiegelberg, Greg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
PostgreSQL 7.3.3 from source
*Please* update to 7.3.4 or 7.3.5 before you get bitten by the
WAL-page-boundary bug ...
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7: don't
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert Creager) writes:
When grilled further on (Wed, 7 Jan 2004 18:06:08 -0500),
Andrew Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] confessed:
We have lately had a couple of cases where machines either locked
up, slowed down to the point of complete unusability, or died
completely while
When grilled further on (Wed, 7 Jan 2004 18:06:08 -0500),
Andrew Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] confessed:
We have lately had a couple of cases where machines either locked up,
slowed down to the point of complete unusability, or died completely
while using jfs. We are _not_ sure that jfs is in
Andrew,
None of this is to say that jfs is in fact to blame, nor even that,
if it is, it does not have something to do with the age of our
installations, c. (these are all RH 8). In fact, I suspect hardware
in both cases. But I thought I'd mention it just in case other
people are seeing
Hi all,
Chris Browne (one of my colleagues here) has posted some tests in the
past indicating that jfs may be the fastest filesystem for Postgres
use on Linux.
We have lately had a couple of cases where machines either locked up,
slowed down to the point of complete unusability, or died
11 matches
Mail list logo
