Re: [PERFORM] poor performance involving a small table
Colton A Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote .. > Seq Scan on sensor (cost=0.00..1.25 rows=1 width=6) (actual > time=0.055..0.068 rows=1 loops=1) > Filter: (sensor_id = 12) > Total runtime: 801641.333 ms > (3 rows) Do you have some foreign keys pointing in the other direction? In other words, is there another table such that a delete on sensors causing a delete (or a check of some key) in another table? EXPLAIN doesn't show these. And that might be a big table missing an index. ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
Re: [PERFORM] poor performance involving a small table
Seq Scan on sensor (cost=0.00..1.25 rows=1 width=6) (actual time=0.055..0.068 rows=1 loops=1) Filter: (sensor_id = 12) Total runtime: 801641.333 ms (3 rows) Can anybody help me out? Thanks so much! Does your table have millions of dead rows? Do you vacuum once an hour? Run VACUUM FULL ANALYE sensor; Chris ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
Re: [PERFORM] poor performance involving a small table
Colton A Smith wrote: Hi: I have a table called sensors: Table "public.sensor" Column | Type |Modifiers -+--+- sensor_id | integer | not null default nextval('sensor_id_seq'::text) sensor_model_id | integer | not null serial_number | character varying(50)| not null purchase_date | timestamp with time zone | not null variable_id | integer | not null datalink_id | integer | not null commentary | text | Indexes: "sensor_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (sensor_id) Foreign-key constraints: "datalink_id_exists" FOREIGN KEY (datalink_id) REFERENCES datalink(datalink_id) ON DELETE RESTRICT "sensor_model_id_exists" FOREIGN KEY (sensor_model_id) REFERENCES sensor_model(sensor_model_id) ON DELETE RESTRICT "variable_id_exists" FOREIGN KEY (variable_id) REFERENCES variable(variable_id) ON DELETE RESTRICT Currently, it has only 19 rows. But when I try to delete a row, it takes forever. I tried restarting the server. I tried a full vacuum to no avail. I tried the following: explain analyze delete from sensor where sensor_id = 12; QUERY PLAN Seq Scan on sensor (cost=0.00..1.25 rows=1 width=6) (actual time=0.055..0.068 rows=1 loops=1) Filter: (sensor_id = 12) Total runtime: 801641.333 ms (3 rows) Can anybody help me out? Thanks so much! I'd say the obvious issue would be your foreign keys slowing things down. Have you analyzed the referenced tables, and indexed the columns on the referenced tables? -- ___ This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately. ___ ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
[PERFORM] poor performance involving a small table
Hi: I have a table called sensors: Table "public.sensor" Column | Type |Modifiers -+--+- sensor_id | integer | not null default nextval('sensor_id_seq'::text) sensor_model_id | integer | not null serial_number | character varying(50)| not null purchase_date | timestamp with time zone | not null variable_id | integer | not null datalink_id | integer | not null commentary | text | Indexes: "sensor_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (sensor_id) Foreign-key constraints: "datalink_id_exists" FOREIGN KEY (datalink_id) REFERENCES datalink(datalink_id) ON DELETE RESTRICT "sensor_model_id_exists" FOREIGN KEY (sensor_model_id) REFERENCES sensor_model(sensor_model_id) ON DELETE RESTRICT "variable_id_exists" FOREIGN KEY (variable_id) REFERENCES variable(variable_id) ON DELETE RESTRICT Currently, it has only 19 rows. But when I try to delete a row, it takes forever. I tried restarting the server. I tried a full vacuum to no avail. I tried the following: explain analyze delete from sensor where sensor_id = 12; QUERY PLAN Seq Scan on sensor (cost=0.00..1.25 rows=1 width=6) (actual time=0.055..0.068 rows=1 loops=1) Filter: (sensor_id = 12) Total runtime: 801641.333 ms (3 rows) Can anybody help me out? Thanks so much! ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings