Micah wrote:
Hmm.
This shoudln't be too hard-PicoGUI's operating system requirements at
runtime are pretty small, and don't include TCP/IP when you're using
pgserver as a library rather than a separate process.
To get the code to actually compile+link without Unixish headers and
libs is a diff
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 08:22:17AM -0500, Gray, Tim wrote:
> aside from that one of the biggest things I had trouble with was getting
> started using picogui from the developer standpoint. expanding the
> documentation, even possibly having a picogui input and an output driver
> howto, like a simp
Hmm.
This shoudln't be too hard- PicoGUI's operating system requirements at
runtime are pretty small, and don't include TCP/IP when you're using
pgserver as a library rather than a separate process.
The build system, though, I'd always felt was too simple rather than
too complex. It doesn't keep t
OOps, sorry Pieter, i didn't click on the reply to all... oops.
reposted for the whole list.
-Original Message-
From: Gray, Tim
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 8:21 AM
To: 'Pieter Grimmerink'
Subject: RE: [Pgui-devel] maintenance of PicoGUI
I also agree that PicoGUI
Micah wrote:
Well, it's not the bugs that disappoint me, it's the lack of forethought
I had when putting together PicoGUI's architecture. The biggest thing that
bothers me still is how it does clipping of 2D primitives. PicoGUI was a great
learning experience for me, but I'm a little surprised peo
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 12:06:12PM +1300, Keith Smith wrote:
>
> I also think that Micah is being too hard on himself and the active
> PicoGUI community. From my own experience, I know that being head-down
> in the buggy parts of the code (where else would you be?) often prevents
> you from seein
On Thu, 2004-03-11 at 11:35, Pieter Grimmerink wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 March 2004 21:04, Lalo Martins wrote:
> > As some of you probably know, PicoGUI is unmaintained; Micah is
> > very disapointed at the actual practical results of the project,
> > regardless of my continuous attempts to convince
On Wednesday 10 March 2004 21:04, Lalo Martins wrote:
> As some of you probably know, PicoGUI is unmaintained; Micah is
> very disapointed at the actual practical results of the project,
> regardless of my continuous attempts to convince him that he
> made a wonderful thing ;-)
I have to agree, i
As some of you probably know, PicoGUI is unmaintained; Micah is
very disapointed at the actual practical results of the project,
regardless of my continuous attempts to convince him that he
made a wonderful thing ;-) You can read about it at
http://www.picogui.org/News/News_Item.2003-10-27.3853
Ho
