On Thu, 11 May 2017 11:34:47 +0200, Cl?ment Bera wrote:
> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:12 PM, Esteban A. Maringolo
> wrote:
>
> > 2017-05-10 13:38 GMT-03:00 Cl?ment Bera :
> > > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 5:28
Hi,
Indeed, this is wonderful news that you will rejoin your baby project :).
Cheers,
Doru
> On May 11, 2017, at 6:40 PM, Alexandre Bergel wrote:
>
> Hi Alain!
>
> Thanks for the mail (even if the historial part has always been pretty clear
> to me).
> We miss you!
Hi alain
This is great to know that you can now work officially on Bloc and I really
hope that your project with Thales will succeed. We need a strong Pharo.
After more than 5 years of discussions with Thales I'm happy to see coming
truth.
People do not imagine the amount of energy we can spend
Hi Alain!
Thanks for the mail (even if the historial part has always been pretty clear to
me).
We miss you! Be back soon!
Cheers,
Alexandre
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.bergel.eu
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
> On May
--- Begin Message ---
Hello Doru, all,
I’m really happy to see Bloc progresses.
Even I’m not active since more than one year, Bloc is still an important
project for me.
but let me complete this short historical presentation a little bit.
Bloc is a project that I initiated in 2013 in
Hi everybody,
I wanted to create a github user to use for ci integration (pharo-ci), and
while configuring it I saw there is already a Pharo-Jenkins user.
https://github.com/Pharo-Jenkins
Does somebody know who is the user?
Guille
--
Guille Polito
Research Engineer
French National
> On 11 May 2017, at 14:37, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
>
> Can't you just set it to a suitable high limit then ? Like 10e6 or so ?
>
> The limit really exists for a reason, else I would not have added it in the
> first place.
>
> I can't really change how dynamic variables
Can't you just set it to a suitable high limit then ? Like 10e6 or so ?
The limit really exists for a reason, else I would not have added it in the
first place.
I can't really change how dynamic variables work, and I don't feel that this
justifies hacking around that.
> On 11 May 2017, at
That's perfect, with one exception: it is still not possible to set the number
of maximum dictionary entries to unlimited. In ZnMultiValueDictionary you have
a nil check for the unlimited case but the dynamic variable will always default
to the default value because DynamicVariable uses the
Ignore that. I hadn't loaded all your code.
> On 11 May 2017, at 14:00, Max Leske wrote:
>
> Hi Sven,
>
> I'm unsure about where to set the dynamic variables. I don't really want to
> do that in my WAApplication as it's not application logic. I could subclass
>
ZnZincServerAdaptor and subclasses expose a #server accessor that gives you
access to the configured Zn server. You should be able to grab that and set
additional options (#maximumEntitySize: #maximumNumberOfDictionaryEntries:
#defaultEncoder:) in your setup code.
> On 11 May 2017, at 14:00,
Branch: refs/heads/6.0
Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core
Commit: 618ef8b3bdc5576186f37dbbfb5d389406491be3
https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core/commit/618ef8b3bdc5576186f37dbbfb5d389406491be3
Author: Jenkins Build Server
Date:
Branch: refs/tags/60485
Home: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-core
Hi Sven,
I'm unsure about where to set the dynamic variables. I don't really want to do
that in my WAApplication as it's not application logic. I could subclass
ZnZincStreamingServerAdaptor... Do you have any suggestions?
Cheers,
Max
> On 11 May 2017, at 13:05, Max Leske
> On 11 May 2017, at 11:49, Sven Van Caekenberghe wrote:
>
> Hi Max,
>
> First thank you for the feedback, the discussion so far and your patches. I
> studied them carefully.
>
> Still, I decided to take another road, implementation wise.
>
> You see, the reason a global
2017-05-11 11:34 GMT+02:00 Clément Bera :
>
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:12 PM, Esteban A. Maringolo <
> emaring...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 2017-05-10 13:38 GMT-03:00 Clément Bera :
>> > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Esteban A. Maringolo <
>>
Hi Max,
First thank you for the feedback, the discussion so far and your patches. I
studied them carefully.
Still, I decided to take another road, implementation wise.
You see, the reason a global setting does not make sense is that there can (and
are) multiple Zn clients and servers active
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:12 PM, Esteban A. Maringolo
wrote:
> 2017-05-10 13:38 GMT-03:00 Clément Bera :
> > On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Esteban A. Maringolo <
> emaring...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> If it is a plug-in, why does it need VM
18 matches
Mail list logo