>>> non-technical topics on my blog as well (which I do not plan).
>>>
>>>
>>> Basically we have four options:
>>> a) we only link to the official twitter account
>>> (https://twitter.com/pharoproject) and blog
>>> (https://pharowe
k to the official twitter account
>> (https://twitter.com/pharoproject) and blog
>> (https://pharoweekly.wordpress.com/)
>> b) extend the list with personal twitter accounts as mentioned in issue
>> #4491 and blogs like mentioned in #4490
>> c) Link and rely on e
> c) Link and rely on external aggregators
> d) Setup an own aggregator on sources we trust
>
> Maybe as a valid solution an official "disclaimer" could help - that opinions
> shared on these PROMOTED sources are not controlled by
> us and do not necessarily refl
o
from the community page.
Thanks
T.
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 05. September 2019 um 08:03 Uhr
> Von: "ducasse"
> An: "Pharo Development List"
> Cc: "The Pharo Project"
> Betreff: [Pharo-dev] About tweets
>
> Hi guys
>
> I encourage everybody
Ok, there seems to be some agreeable sense. Dealing with accounts of people
tends to collect opinions and things not related to pharo. We are not
interested in these.
There are hashtags and mentions for things related to a topic. But a few (!)
want to have more control. So using the
Yes, I closed that issue.
This is not going to happen, sorry :)
Esteban
> On 5 Sep 2019, at 08:03, ducasse wrote:
>
> Hi guys
>
> I encourage everybody to read this issue until the last conversation.
> https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/4491
>
> I have problem to promote
Hi guys
I encourage everybody to read this issue until the last conversation.
https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/issues/4491
I have problem to promote an aggregator that can contain tweets containing
#abortionismurder inside.!
And I have even more problem that this is in a
