Re: [Pharo-dev] about miniimage

2013-11-27 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
would be great. I'm doing boring admin right now and I was trying to understand why I get a problem unload Nautilus. Stef On Nov 27, 2013, at 1:46 PM, Pavel Krivanek pavel.kriva...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/11/26 Stéphane Ducasse stephane.duca...@inria.fr On Nov 26, 2013, at 3:27 PM,

Re: [Pharo-dev] about miniimage

2013-11-26 Thread Pavel Krivanek
This is the list of newly created unimplemented calls: Tests removal: a SortedCollection('Array generateSpecFormat calls: s ' 'FreeTypeFontProvider getWindowsFontFolderPath calls: char asPointerType invokeWith:with:with:with:with: long name:module:callType:returnType:argumentTypes: '

Re: [Pharo-dev] about miniimage

2013-11-26 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
On Nov 26, 2013, at 3:27 PM, Pavel Krivanek pavel.kriva...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Stef, I started to play with this way of shrinking (see the attachment). At least it's really faster than to use MC :-) Sure :) Do you have a ci job to produce an image systematically? Where are the

Re: [Pharo-dev] about miniimage

2013-11-26 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
Guillermo has several bootstrapped and minimal images. I tried to find them but I could not https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/job/Bootstrap/ Guillermo? Is now on holidays. Yes, but coding when not seeing family :) :) https://ci.inria.fr/rmod/view/Oz/ OK I will try to

Re: [Pharo-dev] about miniimage

2013-11-25 Thread Eliot Miranda
Hi Pavel, Hi All, On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Pavel Krivanek pavel.kriva...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Stef, our starting point looks like this: - we have a method how to produce small image without network etc. - we are able to load network, Monticello and Gofer in it (this job is

Re: [Pharo-dev] about miniimage

2013-11-25 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
On Nov 25, 2013, at 7:11 AM, Pavel Krivanek pavel.kriva...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Stef, our starting point looks like this: - we have a method how to produce small image without network etc. - we are able to load network, Monticello and Gofer in it (this job is currently broken) - we are

Re: [Pharo-dev] about miniimage

2013-11-25 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
From the practical point of view, it's always faster to remove. something than to load something. And it's much faster to unload it without Monticello. So I would use ugly removeAllButPackages: because it's fast, then fix the problems like obsolete classes an Undeclared, continue with the

Re: [Pharo-dev] about miniimage

2013-11-25 Thread Guillermo Polito
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Stéphane Ducasse stephane.duca...@inria.fr wrote: From the practical point of view, it's always faster to remove. something than to load something. And it's much faster to unload it without Monticello. So I would use ugly removeAllButPackages: because it's

Re: [Pharo-dev] about miniimage

2013-11-25 Thread Eliot Miranda
Hi Guillermo, Hi Stef, On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Guillermo Polito guillermopol...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Stéphane Ducasse stephane.duca...@inria.fr wrote: From the practical point of view, it's always faster to remove. something than to load

Re: [Pharo-dev] about miniimage

2013-11-25 Thread Pavel Krivanek
We have a small REPL image for Pharo 2.0 https://ci.inria.fr/pharo-contribution/view/Pharo-Kernel-2.0/job/PharoKernel2.0-OSProcess-evaluator/ It uses this code:

[Pharo-dev] about miniimage

2013-11-24 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
Hi pavel may be I should start from your miniimage and start to making sure that the configurations can load then in a second step I can make sure that they can unload. What do you think? Stef

Re: [Pharo-dev] about miniimage

2013-11-24 Thread Pavel Krivanek
Hi Stef, our starting point looks like this: - we have a method how to produce small image without network etc. - we are able to load network, Monticello and Gofer in it (this job is currently broken) - we are able to load Metacello too - this should be the basic stage for normal users - than