Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] Could we keep Pharo-dev for Pharo-dev?

2015-01-15 Thread Sven Van Caekenberghe
On 15 Jan 2015, at 08:24, stepharo steph...@free.fr wrote: Hi guys I will start to be picky about the mails to which I reply or even read. We should be more disciplined. Pharo-dev should be about Pharo-dev this is important for our concentration. I really like the other discussions

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] Could we keep Pharo-dev for Pharo-dev?

2015-01-15 Thread Norbert Hartl
Absolutely! Norbert Am 15.01.2015 um 08:24 schrieb stepharo steph...@free.fr: Hi guys I will start to be picky about the mails to which I reply or even read. We should be more disciplined. Pharo-dev should be about Pharo-dev this is important for our concentration. I really like the

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] Could we keep Pharo-dev for Pharo-dev?

2015-01-15 Thread Max Leske
On 15 Jan 2015, at 11:26, Stephan Eggermont step...@stack.nl wrote: Serge wrote: and point to Pharo StackOverflow questions/answers if necessary. That is a bad idea. Stackoverflow works pretty bad for us. Questions get closed by clueless moderators. The gaming system doesn't work for

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] Could we keep Pharo-dev for Pharo-dev?

2015-01-15 Thread Stephan Eggermont
Frank wrote: I don't see how [t]he gaming system doesn't work for non-mainstream technologies can be true. F#, Clojure, Haskell are hardly mainstream technologies, and SO works just great for them. It doesn't for smalltalk. Just take a look at top users for [smalltalk] and compare. Then look

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] Could we keep Pharo-dev for Pharo-dev?

2015-01-15 Thread Stephan Eggermont
Serge wrote: and point to Pharo StackOverflow questions/answers if necessary. That is a bad idea. Stackoverflow works pretty bad for us. Questions get closed by clueless moderators. The gaming system doesn't work for non-mainstream technologies. Stephan

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] Could we keep Pharo-dev for Pharo-dev?

2015-01-15 Thread Serge Stinckwich
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Stephan Eggermont step...@stack.nl wrote: Serge wrote: and point to Pharo StackOverflow questions/answers if necessary. That is a bad idea. Stackoverflow works pretty bad for us. Questions get closed by clueless moderators. The gaming system doesn't work for

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] Could we keep Pharo-dev for Pharo-dev?

2015-01-15 Thread Frank Shearar
On 15 January 2015 at 10:26, Stephan Eggermont step...@stack.nl wrote: Serge wrote: and point to Pharo StackOverflow questions/answers if necessary. That is a bad idea. Stackoverflow works pretty bad for us. Questions get closed by clueless moderators. The gaming system doesn't work for

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] Could we keep Pharo-dev for Pharo-dev?

2015-01-15 Thread Serge Stinckwich
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Sven Van Caekenberghe s...@stfx.eu wrote: On 15 Jan 2015, at 08:24, stepharo steph...@free.fr wrote: Hi guys I will start to be picky about the mails to which I reply or even read. We should be more disciplined. Pharo-dev should be about Pharo-dev this is

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] Could we keep Pharo-dev for Pharo-dev?

2015-01-15 Thread p...@highoctane.be
Le 15 janv. 2015 12:20, Stephan Eggermont step...@stack.nl a écrit : Frank wrote: I don't see how [t]he gaming system doesn't work for non-mainstream technologies can be true. F#, Clojure, Haskell are hardly mainstream technologies, and SO works just great for them. It doesn't for

Re: [Pharo-dev] [Pharo-users] Could we keep Pharo-dev for Pharo-dev?

2015-01-14 Thread Tudor Girba
+1 Doru On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:24 AM, stepharo steph...@free.fr wrote: Hi guys I will start to be picky about the mails to which I reply or even read. We should be more disciplined. Pharo-dev should be about Pharo-dev this is important for our concentration. I really like the other