Sure have a look at SystemLogger
http://smalltalkhub.com/#!/~StephaneDucasse/SystemLogger
I did not check the changes made by norbert. I will work on it during xmas.
Stef
On Dec 3, 2013, at 11:47 AM, "p...@highoctane.be" wrote:
> What's wrong with Strings anyway? But yeah, I underst
Am 03.12.2013 um 11:47 schrieb p...@highoctane.be:
> What's wrong with Strings anyway? But yeah, I understand your point.
>
Strings are fine when you don’t need specific behavior oder structure of your
log messages anymore. A conversion to string should in most cases happen as
late as possible
What's wrong with Strings anyway? But yeah, I understand your point.
What I have done for my own stuff is to have a TLog aspect with info,
debug, error, warn and, well, Strings. But double dispatch could take care
of that, like printOn:, storeOn: etc.
Do you have some code that I can look at?
TL
On Dec 3, 2013, at 10:34 AM, p...@highoctane.be wrote:
> I am working on this one.
>
> Don't kill the transcript, it is useful when working without a console.
I will not kill it but it will just be dull outputer for my logger. In fact I'm
missing a user interface (the idea was to build it with
I am working on this one.
Don't kill the transcript, it is useful when working without a console.
Now, adding the features you mention is not hard. And the top right
triangle menu of Transcript could get a clue from the Workspace one with a
Save As entry.
I once had an issue with things like (ou
On Dec 3, 2013, at 2:59 AM, Esteban A. Maringolo wrote:
> 2013/12/2 Sean P. DeNigris :
>> EstebanLM wrote
>>> yes, the transcript is ThreadSafeTranscript
>>
>> Does "ThreadSafe" mean I don't have to wrap all my debug logging in
>> "WorldState addDeferredUIMessage: [ Transcript... ]? That would
On Dec 2, 2013, at 8:46 PM, p...@highoctane.be wrote:
> And missing a ton of methods.
>
> Teh StackInterpreterSimulator is agreeing with this statement.
send us the ones that are missing.
Please note that we should kill the transcript in the future because this is a
^%$&*((^%$* outdated way t
> Am 02.12.2013 um 19:56 schrieb Stéphane Ducasse :
>
>
>> The return of the toothpick is near. o/
>
> No I will finish my logger :)
>
From next week on I will have a little time to work on it, too. If you like we
can discuss a few things and bring to some usable state.
Norbert
On 3 December 2013 02:59, Esteban A. Maringolo wrote:
> 2013/12/2 Sean P. DeNigris :
> > EstebanLM wrote
> >> yes, the transcript is ThreadSafeTranscript
> >
> > Does "ThreadSafe" mean I don't have to wrap all my debug logging in
> > "WorldState addDeferredUIMessage: [ Transcript... ]? That would
2013/12/2 Sean P. DeNigris :
> EstebanLM wrote
>> yes, the transcript is ThreadSafeTranscript
>
> Does "ThreadSafe" mean I don't have to wrap all my debug logging in
> "WorldState addDeferredUIMessage: [ Transcript... ]? That would save a lot
> of time :)
According to the implementation it means t
EstebanLM wrote
> yes, the transcript is ThreadSafeTranscript
Does "ThreadSafe" mean I don't have to wrap all my debug logging in
"WorldState addDeferredUIMessage: [ Transcript... ]? That would save a lot
of time :)
-
Cheers,
Sean
--
View this message in context:
http://forum.world.st/tran
And missing a ton of methods.
Teh StackInterpreterSimulator is agreeing with this statement.
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 8:05 PM, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
> yes, the transcript is ThreadSafeTranscript
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk wrote:
>
>> Buy the way, is absence of Trans
yes, the transcript is ThreadSafeTranscript
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Yuriy Tymchuk wrote:
> Buy the way, is absence of Transcript class - ok?
>
> I know how it all works now, but is it ok? :)
>
> uko
>
>
> On 02 Dec 2013, at 19:58, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
>
> yes, please :)
>
>
> On Mo
Buy the way, is absence of Transcript class - ok?
I know how it all works now, but is it ok? :)
uko
On 02 Dec 2013, at 19:58, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
> yes, please :)
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
> wrote:
>
> > The return of the toothpick is near. o/
>
> No I w
yes, please :)
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
wrote:
>
> > The return of the toothpick is near. o/
>
> No I will finish my logger :)
>
> Stef
>
>
> The return of the toothpick is near. o/
No I will finish my logger :)
Stef
The return of the toothpick is near. o/
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Stéphane Ducasse
wrote:
> I can tell that it does not work when loading partial code because all the
> compiler warnings make sure that you
> cannot see anything….
> I should have pushed my logger more. :(
>
17 matches
Mail list logo
