Re: [Pharo-dev] How stable 64-bit VM?

ah, yeah, forgot to mention that i run it on ubuntu 16.04 On 25 December 2016 at 06:28, Igor Stasenko wrote: > Hi, > sorry for my ignorance, > i downloaded fresh build of 64-bit VM and has strange hiccups (crash on > downloading/installing a package)... > is it stable, or it

[Pharo-dev] How stable 64-bit VM?

Hi, sorry for my ignorance, i downloaded fresh build of 64-bit VM and has strange hiccups (crash on downloading/installing a package)... is it stable, or it is just me, too ignorant & stupid? -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko.

Re: [Pharo-dev] Q: any work around ROS has been done on Pharo?

On 24 December 2016 at 14:07, Johan Fabry wrote: > Hi Igor, Alex, > > we are actually using PhaROS underneath, which was built by the guys at > Douai (Luc, Noury, et.al.). They deserve all the ROS interfacing credit :-) > See

Re: [Pharo-dev] Q: any work around ROS has been done on Pharo?

Hi Igor, Alex, we are actually using PhaROS underneath, which was built by the guys at Douai (Luc, Noury, et.al.). They deserve all the ROS interfacing credit :-) See http://car.mines-douai.fr/2014/06/how-to-install-pharos/ -- Does this mail seem too brief? Sorry for that, I don’t mean to be

Re: [Pharo-dev] Q: any work around ROS has been done on Pharo?

Hi Igor, Johan Fabry and his group have been working on a complete environment on top of ROS to steer robots. https://pleiad.cl/research/software/lrp Cheers, Alexandre > On Dec 22, 2016, at 9:38 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote: > > Hi, > > i wonder, are there any projects to

Re: [Pharo-dev] Q: any work around ROS has been done on Pharo?

Maybe on github: https://github.com/CARMinesDouai I would like to use PhaROS for a new project. I'm also interested to have access to last version ;-) Envoyé de mon iPhone > Le 24 déc. 2016 à 10:10, Esteban Lorenzano a écrit : > > >> On 24 Dec 2016, at 10:09, Esteban

Re: [Pharo-dev] Q: any work around ROS has been done on Pharo?

> On 24 Dec 2016, at 10:09, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > > http://car.mines-douai.fr/category/pharos/ > > > no idea what’s that status of all that, but I remember Santiago considered > that version of Pharo as obsolete (but no

Re: [Pharo-dev] Q: any work around ROS has been done on Pharo?

http://car.mines-douai.fr/category/pharos/ no idea what’s that status of all that, but I remember Santiago considered that version of Pharo as obsolete (but no idea if it was replaced). Esteban > On 24 Dec 2016, at 09:43, Igor Stasenko

Re: [Pharo-dev] Epicea user experience report

I prefer option 2 because Epicea name is not really important and means nothing for the beginner. What is really important in then world menu is the function. Envoyé de mon iPhone > Le 24 déc. 2016 à 09:35, stepharong a écrit : > > On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 19:46:34 +0100,

Re: [Pharo-dev] Q: any work around ROS has been done on Pharo?

Yes, i remember this.. But i never had a chance to look for details.. Would be nice to hear what is there, since i complete noob with ROS :) Is Noury & others reading this mailing list? I thought they are.. On 23 December 2016 at 17:15, stepharong wrote: > Hi igor > >

Re: [Pharo-dev] Epicea user experience report

On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 19:46:34 +0100, Martin Dias wrote: Ben, yes, please create the issues if you want, and I will try to implement them soon. I guess if they are mostly UI changes and categorized to "first impression count" or something like that, they >can still