[Pharo-dev] [Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #687: 21551 Cleanup testCompositionCopy

2018-03-11 Thread ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2
There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #687 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1077 was integrated: "21551 Cleanup testCompositionCopy" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1077 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/21551 Build Url:

[Pharo-dev] [Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #686: 21558 Cleanup test0CopyTest

2018-03-11 Thread ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2
There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #686 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1083 was integrated: "21558 Cleanup test0CopyTest" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1083 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/21558 Build Url:

[Pharo-dev] feenk log

2018-03-11 Thread Tudor Girba
Hi, Here is an update of the work on Bloc, Brick and GT. As always, please do let us know what you think. Bloc: - Improved the deletion in the text editor and covered the scenarios with examples - Worked on the text selection. Still work needed for selection to be production ready:

[Pharo-dev] [Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #685: 21548 Review String>>endsWithAnyOf:

2018-03-11 Thread ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2
There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #685 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1074 was integrated: "21548 Review String>>endsWithAnyOf:" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1074 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/21548 Build Url:

[Pharo-dev] [Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #684: 21549 Simplify testAtAllPutAll in TPutTest

2018-03-11 Thread ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2
There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #684 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1075 was integrated: "21549 Simplify testAtAllPutAll in TPutTest" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1075 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/21549

Re: [Pharo-dev] pharo64+git crash

2018-03-11 Thread Thierry Goubier
Le 11/03/2018 à 18:09, Javier Pimás a écrit : Didn't work. Tried also with vmT70 and vmI70 and neither did work. Sometimes they segfault, sometimes they hang using 100% cpu. I noticed that being for pharo7 those vms seemed pretty old (aug-2017), so I tried vmTLatest70 and that one finally

[Pharo-dev] [Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #683: 21544 All classToBeTested should be in same protocol and same format

2018-03-11 Thread ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2
There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #683 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1070 was integrated: "21544 All classToBeTested should be in same protocol and same format" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1070 Issue Url:

[Pharo-dev] Loading configuration of spur

2018-03-11 Thread Javier Pimás
Ok, now I moved forward but cannot load vmmaker sources into a pharo 61 image, is that supported? I have this snippet that doesn't work: Metacello new filetreeDirectory: '../VMMaker/mc'; baseline: 'Spur'; load where ../VMMaker/mc is a clone of the official pharo repo at github. Cheers, pocho

Re: [Pharo-dev] pharo64+git crash

2018-03-11 Thread Javier Pimás
Didn't work. Tried also with vmT70 and vmI70 and neither did work. Sometimes they segfault, sometimes they hang using 100% cpu. I noticed that being for pharo7 those vms seemed pretty old (aug-2017), so I tried vmTLatest70 and that one finally worked. On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 6:31 AM, Thierry

[Pharo-dev] [Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #682: 21475 Use ifNil: in HashedCollection grow

2018-03-11 Thread ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2
There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #682 was: FAILURE. The Pull Request #1010 was integrated: "21475 Use ifNil: in HashedCollection grow" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1010 Issue Url: https://pharo.fogbugz.com/f/cases/21475

Re: [Pharo-dev] pharo64+git crash

2018-03-11 Thread Thierry Goubier
Hi Javier, can you try with a 64 bits Pharo 7 vm (http://get.pharo.org/64/vm70)? The Pharo 6 64bits vm used to have segfaults upon code loading. Regards, Thierry Le 10/03/2018 à 22:59, Javier Pimás a écrit : Hi, I wonder if I'm doing something wrong or using a wrong version: I download a

[Pharo-dev] [Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #681: 21543-IdentityNewValueHoldervalue-doesnt-follow-contract-of-NewValueHoldervalue

2018-03-11 Thread ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2
There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #681 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1069 was integrated: "21543-IdentityNewValueHoldervalue-doesnt-follow-contract-of-NewValueHoldervalue" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1069 Issue Url:

[Pharo-dev] [Pharo 7.0-dev] Build #680: 21531 Fix critiques in in NonInteractiveTranscript and DailyNonInteractiveTranscript

2018-03-11 Thread ci-pharo-ci-jenkins2
There is a new Pharo build available! The status of the build #680 was: SUCCESS. The Pull Request #1055 was integrated: "21531 Fix critiques in in NonInteractiveTranscript and DailyNonInteractiveTranscript" Pull request url: https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo/pull/1055 Issue Url: