Re: [Pharo-dev] 32 bits and 64 bits VM

2014-05-20 Thread Jimmie Houchin

On 05/19/2014 05:01 PM, Eliot Miranda wrote:

On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Damien Cassou damien.cas...@gmail.com
mailto:damien.cassou-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org wrote:

On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Eliot Miranda
eliot.miranda-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org
mailto:eliot.miranda-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org wrote:
  Can you point me to this?  I'd like to see if I can use it with
my linux
  installs.

it works in most of the supported Ubuntu releases:
http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download/ubuntu

Ah, oh.  Am I right to think the magic command is sudo dpkg
--add-architecture i386? If so is there a dpkg command to check if the
i386 architecture has been installed?

--
Damien Cassou
http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st

Success is the ability to go from one failure to another
without losing enthusiasm.
Winston Churchill

--
best,
Eliot


I am running Crunchbang #! Linux using the Jessie repositories.
Crunchbang is a Debian distribution with only a number of preconfigured 
items, such as OpenBox, Tint2, etc. to give a nice out of the box Debian 
experience.


The Ubuntu PPAs do not work well or could cause problems for Debian systems.

From the pharo-vm GitHub page I downloaded and modified this script to 
work on my system. It should work on most any 64bit Debian 
Jessie/Testing and probably Sid/Unstable systems. I am not sure about 
Wheezy.


https://github.com/pharo-project/pharo-vm/blob/master/scripts/setup-ubuntu.sh

Download the above and edit. Or copy the below into a file and save. I 
called mine setup-pharo.sh.


Hope this helps.

Jimmie


dpkg --add-architecture i386
apt-get update

# INSTALL BUILD LIBRARIES 
==
apt-get --yes install cmake zip bash-completion ruby git xz-utils 
debhelper devscripts
apt-get --yes install libc6-dev:i386 libasound2:i386 libasound2-dev:i386 
libasound2-plugins:i386
apt-get --yes install libssl-dev:i386 libssl1.0.0:i386 
libfreetype6-dev:i386 libx11-dev:i386 libsm-dev:i386 libice-dev:i386

apt-get --yes install build-essential gcc-multilib g++
# due to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/949606 we 
cannot directly install libgl1-mesa-dev:i386

apt-get --yes install libgl1-mesa-dev:i386 libgl1-mesa-glx:i386
#ln -s /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/mesa/libGL.so 
/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libGL.so
#ln -s /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/mesa/libGL.so.1 
/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/mesa/libGL.so






Re: [Pharo-dev] 32 bits and 64 bits VM

2014-05-19 Thread Damien Cassou
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Hilaire Fernandes
hilaire.fernan...@gmail.com wrote:
 I know for years[1], only solve partially, on some Linux distribution,
 not really user friendly, support of this solution may change over
 making installation of 32bits libs even more complicated for average user.


the PPA I have created hides all these details. You just have to
install the pharo-vm-desktop package and dependencies will follow. It
works on both 32bits and 64bits.

-- 
Damien Cassou
http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st

Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without
losing enthusiasm.
Winston Churchill



Re: [Pharo-dev] 32 bits and 64 bits VM

2014-05-19 Thread Hilaire Fernandes
Definitely helpful for developer but not for user of an application
developed with Pharo. I know I am probably the only one facing this
situation, developing desktop applications with Pharo but VM packages
does not solve my problem.
Indeed, when releasing DrGeo (and iStoa) to the public I have to provide
a VM: I don't know the target linux system nor its version.

Hilaire

Le 19/05/2014 17:26, Damien Cassou a écrit :
 the PPA I have created hides all these details. You just have to
 install the pharo-vm-desktop package and dependencies will follow. It
 works on both 32bits and 64bits.

-- 
Dr. Geo http://drgeo.eu




Re: [Pharo-dev] 32 bits and 64 bits VM

2014-05-19 Thread Damien Cassou
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Hilaire Fernandes
hilaire.fernan...@gmail.com wrote:
 Indeed, when releasing DrGeo (and iStoa) to the public I have to provide
 a VM: I don't know the target linux system nor its version.


on Ubuntu, I can only recommend to use the PPA system. I do that for
Phratch, Pillar and Launcher. I'm simplifying the infrastructure to
facilitate the creation of Pharo-based end-user applications on
Ubuntu. But it already works.

-- 
Damien Cassou
http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st

Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without
losing enthusiasm.
Winston Churchill



Re: [Pharo-dev] 32 bits and 64 bits VM

2014-05-19 Thread Hilaire Fernandes
For me shipping the VM with the application eases the installation by
the user and the production of release. The alternative will be to build
a .debian package of Drgeo with only the image, then do the same for
each ubuntu version (the two last ubuntu LTS have different approach for
32 bits compatibilty, so debian installation script need to be different).
Of course, work need to be duplicated for the different Linux systems,
probably the most popular only, but still will close the door to
distribution I do not provide package. I just can't cope with that.

Hilaire

Le 19/05/2014 17:52, Damien Cassou a écrit :
 On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 5:49 PM, Hilaire Fernandes
 hilaire.fernan...@gmail.com wrote:
 Indeed, when releasing DrGeo (and iStoa) to the public I have to provide
 a VM: I don't know the target linux system nor its version.
 
 
 on Ubuntu, I can only recommend to use the PPA system. I do that for
 Phratch, Pillar and Launcher. I'm simplifying the infrastructure to
 facilitate the creation of Pharo-based end-user applications on
 Ubuntu. But it already works.
 

-- 
Dr. Geo http://drgeo.eu




Re: [Pharo-dev] 32 bits and 64 bits VM

2014-05-19 Thread Sergi Reyner
2014-05-19 17:00 GMT+01:00 Hilaire Fernandes hilaire.fernan...@gmail.com:

 For me shipping the VM with the application eases the installation by
 the user and the production of release.



 Of course, work need to be duplicated for the different Linux systems,
 probably the most popular only, but still will close the door to
 distribution I do not provide package. I just can't cope with that.


I hear you !

Cheers,
Sergi


Re: [Pharo-dev] 32 bits and 64 bits VM

2014-05-19 Thread Eliot Miranda
Hi Damien,


On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Damien Cassou damien.cas...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Hilaire Fernandes
 hilaire.fernan...@gmail.com wrote:
  I know for years[1], only solve partially, on some Linux distribution,
  not really user friendly, support of this solution may change over
  making installation of 32bits libs even more complicated for average
 user.


 the PPA I have created hides all these details. You just have to
 install the pharo-vm-desktop package and dependencies will follow. It
 works on both 32bits and 64bits.


Can you point me to this?  I'd like to see if I can use it with my linux
installs.



 --
 Damien Cassou
 http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st

 Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without
 losing enthusiasm.
 Winston Churchill




-- 
best,
Eliot


Re: [Pharo-dev] 32 bits and 64 bits VM

2014-05-19 Thread Damien Cassou
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Eliot Miranda eliot.mira...@gmail.com wrote:
 Can you point me to this?  I'd like to see if I can use it with my linux
 installs.

it works in most of the supported Ubuntu releases:
http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download/ubuntu

-- 
Damien Cassou
http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st

Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without
losing enthusiasm.
Winston Churchill



Re: [Pharo-dev] 32 bits and 64 bits VM

2014-05-19 Thread Norbert Hartl

Am 19.05.2014 um 22:01 schrieb Damien Cassou damien.cas...@gmail.com:

 On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Eliot Miranda eliot.mira...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 Can you point me to this?  I'd like to see if I can use it with my linux
 installs.
 
 it works in most of the supported Ubuntu releases:
 http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download/ubuntu
 
Right! Ich have 20 images running in different versions and everything is 
working like a breeze. Well, sometimes my code sucks  :)

Norbert





Re: [Pharo-dev] 32 bits and 64 bits VM

2014-05-19 Thread Eliot Miranda
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Damien Cassou damien.cas...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Eliot Miranda eliot.mira...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Can you point me to this?  I'd like to see if I can use it with my linux
  installs.

 it works in most of the supported Ubuntu releases:
 http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download/ubuntu


Ah, oh.  Am I right to think the magic command is sudo dpkg
--add-architecture i386? If so is there a dpkg command to check if the
i386 architecture has been installed?

--
 Damien Cassou
 http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st

 Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without losing
 enthusiasm.
 Winston Churchill

-- 
best,
Eliot


Re: [Pharo-dev] 32 bits and 64 bits VM

2014-05-19 Thread Norbert Hartl

Am 20.05.2014 um 00:01 schrieb Eliot Miranda eliot.mira...@gmail.com:

 
 
 
 On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Damien Cassou damien.cas...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Eliot Miranda eliot.mira...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
  Can you point me to this?  I'd like to see if I can use it with my linux
  installs.
 
 it works in most of the supported Ubuntu releases:
 http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download/ubuntu
 
 Ah, oh.  Am I right to think the magic command is sudo dpkg 
 --add-architecture i386? If so is there a dpkg command to check if the i386 
 architecture has been installed?

Yes you are right. And the command is

$ dpkg --print-foreign-architectures

Norbert

 
 --
 Damien Cassou
 http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st
 
 Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without losing 
 enthusiasm.
 Winston Churchill
 -- 
 best,
 Eliot



Re: [Pharo-dev] 32 bits and 64 bits VM

2014-05-16 Thread Esteban Lorenzano

On 15 May 2014, at 18:46, Hilaire Fernandes hilaire.fernan...@gmail.com wrote:

 Great.
 
 As we are discussing about build, is it possible to compile CogVM on 64
 bits architecture as it is already the case for the interpreted SqueakVM
 (https://packages.debian.org/sid/squeak-vm)?

I do not understand. To compile a regular vm in a 64bits platform is trivial. 
You just need to have the 32bits library installed.
But to have a 64bits vm that runs on 64bits… that’s another very different 
history:

- you need a 64bits image (so trace, export, etc.)
- you need to be 64bits word size aware (not so complicated, but a lot of 
work). 
- you need 64bits plugins (a lot of them)
- you need 64bits JIT (or no JIT at all)

Some time ago there was an experimental 64bits interpreter vm (not even stack). 
Who worked with a special traced image.
What squeak guys are doing in the link you provide is still building a 32bits 
vm. 

Now. In the agenda for this year is to work on a 64bits spur version. If 
everything is fine and the stars align properly, it will be ready around 
christmas. 

Esteban


 
 Hilaire
 
 Le 15/05/2014 18:24, Esteban Lorenzano a écrit :
 so yes… I integrated the fix, created a pull request, waited until 
 validation… and then I forget to merge :S
 it should be in process to build now. 
 
 -- 
 Dr. Geo http://drgeo.eu
 
 




Re: [Pharo-dev] 32 bits and 64 bits VM

2014-05-16 Thread Andres Valloud

* 64-bit aware hashing functions as the current ones are 32-bit centric.


This issue might not be the most urgent because the 32 bit hash 
functions should be sufficient to deal with at least moderately sized 64 
bit images.  But how much stuff would you have to allocate before seeing 
a problem?


Suppose object headers are 16 bytes and your hash functions are 
producing 28 bits' worth of data.  Clearly hashing 2^28 objects with 
zero instance variables and zero byte data is kind of silly, so we put 
in at least one instance variable making those objects at least 24 
bytes.  Then you also need a hashed collection with a single table large 
enough to hold all those objects (ignoring e.g. hash buckets), the load 
factor of which will be kept at 80%.  So...


24 * 2^28 * 4 // 5 + (2^28 * 8) = about 7gb

So, the current hash functions should be fine for images up to 7gb in 
size, and probably much larger than that because 7gb is the rock bottom 
low estimate.  Probably one might hash strings or other objects with 
more data than 8 bytes.  In that case, the low bound in that case will 
be higher.


Andres.



Re: [Pharo-dev] 32 bits and 64 bits VM

2014-05-16 Thread p...@highoctane.be
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Andres Valloud 
avall...@smalltalk.comcastbiz.net wrote:

 * 64-bit aware hashing functions as the current ones are 32-bit centric.


 This issue might not be the most urgent because the 32 bit hash functions
 should be sufficient to deal with at least moderately sized 64 bit images.
  But how much stuff would you have to allocate before seeing a problem?

 Suppose object headers are 16 bytes and your hash functions are producing
 28 bits' worth of data.  Clearly hashing 2^28 objects with zero instance
 variables and zero byte data is kind of silly, so we put in at least one
 instance variable making those objects at least 24 bytes.  Then you also
 need a hashed collection with a single table large enough to hold all those
 objects (ignoring e.g. hash buckets), the load factor of which will be kept
 at 80%.  So...

 24 * 2^28 * 4 // 5 + (2^28 * 8) = about 7gb

 So, the current hash functions should be fine for images up to 7gb in
 size, and probably much larger than that because 7gb is the rock bottom low
 estimate.  Probably one might hash strings or other objects with more data
 than 8 bytes.  In that case, the low bound in that case will be higher.


Thanks for this, always enlightening.

Phil



 Andres.




Re: [Pharo-dev] 32 bits and 64 bits VM

2014-05-16 Thread Hilaire Fernandes
the SqueakVM https://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/squeak-vm/download
is linked against 64bits libraries, at least as far as I am correct this
is what say:

ldd squeakvm

Next I tested I can run DrGeo (1.4 pharo based, 32 bits image) with this
VM on a 64 bits host (uname -a).

Pharo 2 does not work as this vm is too old.

Where am I wrong?

Hilaire

Le 16/05/2014 10:20, Esteban Lorenzano a écrit :
 I do not understand. To compile a regular vm in a 64bits platform is trivial. 
 You just need to have the 32bits library installed.
 But to have a 64bits vm that runs on 64bits… that’s another very different 
 history:

-- 
Dr. Geo http://drgeo.eu




Re: [Pharo-dev] 32 bits and 64 bits VM

2014-05-16 Thread Chris Cunningham
Right.  Running an image natively in 64 bits doesn't mean you have to have
a 64 bit image as well.
http://timmydosmalltalk.wordpress.com/2014/03/13/howto-build-a-64-native-standardvm-running-32-bit-image-on-slackware-linux-14-1-with-32-bit-compat-libs/
(not my work at all - just sharing).

-cbc


On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 6:33 AM, Hilaire Fernandes 
hilaire.fernan...@gmail.com wrote:

 the SqueakVM https://packages.debian.org/sid/amd64/squeak-vm/download
 is linked against 64bits libraries, at least as far as I am correct this
 is what say:

 ldd squeakvm

 Next I tested I can run DrGeo (1.4 pharo based, 32 bits image) with this
 VM on a 64 bits host (uname -a).

 Pharo 2 does not work as this vm is too old.

 Where am I wrong?

 Hilaire

 Le 16/05/2014 10:20, Esteban Lorenzano a écrit :
  I do not understand. To compile a regular vm in a 64bits platform is
 trivial. You just need to have the 32bits library installed.
  But to have a 64bits vm that runs on 64bits… that’s another very
 different history:

 --
 Dr. Geo http://drgeo.eu





Re: [Pharo-dev] 32 bits and 64 bits VM

2014-05-16 Thread Damien Cassou
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Hilaire Fernandes
hilaire.fernan...@gmail.com wrote:
 Yesterday my boss asked me to see DrGeo on his Ununtu 14.04LTS 64 bits
 machine. I could not get it working

Following these simple instructions would have fixed the problem in 2 minutes:
http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download/ubuntu

I run the exact same OS and Pharo works perfectly.

-- 
Damien Cassou
http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st

Success is the ability to go from one failure to another without
losing enthusiasm.
Winston Churchill



Re: [Pharo-dev] 32 bits and 64 bits VM

2014-05-16 Thread Hilaire Fernandes
I know for years[1], only solve partially, on some Linux distribution,
not really user friendly, support of this solution may change over
making installation of 32bits libs even more complicated for average user.

Now my question was related to 64bits, and I am really curious about
this 64bits squeakvm compiled for Debian AMD64

Le 16/05/2014 18:17, Damien Cassou a écrit :
 On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Hilaire Fernandes
 hilaire.fernan...@gmail.com wrote:
 Yesterday my boss asked me to see DrGeo on his Ununtu 14.04LTS 64 bits
 machine. I could not get it working
 
 Following these simple instructions would have fixed the problem in 2 minutes:
 http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download/ubuntu
 
 I run the exact same OS and Pharo works perfectly.
 

[1]
http://www.drgeo.eu/community/faq#TOC-Can-I-run-it-in-my-Linux-64-bits-host-


-- 
Dr. Geo http://drgeo.eu




Re: [Pharo-dev] 32 bits and 64 bits VM

2014-05-16 Thread David T. Lewis
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 10:20:47AM +0200, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
 
 On 15 May 2014, at 18:46, Hilaire Fernandes hilaire.fernan...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 
  Great.
  
  As we are discussing about build, is it possible to compile CogVM on 64
  bits architecture as it is already the case for the interpreted SqueakVM
  (https://packages.debian.org/sid/squeak-vm)?
 
 I do not understand. To compile a regular vm in a 64bits platform is trivial. 
 You just need to have the 32bits library installed.
 But to have a 64bits vm that runs on 64bits? that?s another very different 
 history:
 
 - you need a 64bits image (so trace, export, etc.)
 - you need to be 64bits word size aware (not so complicated, but a lot of 
 work). 
 - you need 64bits plugins (a lot of them)
 - you need 64bits JIT (or no JIT at all)
 
 Some time ago there was an experimental 64bits interpreter vm (not even 
 stack). Who worked with a special traced image.
 What squeak guys are doing in the link you provide is still building a 32bits 
 vm. 

It's experimental 64 bit image is not really all that experimental any more,
although Ian still labels it as such on squeakvm.org/unix. A compiled VM is
available there. Building it from source is just a matter of specifying 
--image64
in the configure step, then doing a make.

Up to date Squeak trunk images in 64-bit format are traced daily at
http://build.squeak.org/job/Squeak%2064-bit%20image/

Dave




Re: [Pharo-dev] 32 bits and 64 bits VM

2014-05-15 Thread Hilaire Fernandes
May be I was not clear. I just mean VM compiled on a 64 bits
architecture, not porting to 64bits architecture.
I remember years ago, a friend, without knowledge on Squeakvm, told me
he compiled it on its 64bits host. Was he wrong somewhere?

Hilaire



Le 14/05/2014 21:43, Clément Bera a écrit :
 The work to port Pharo to 64 bits has started.
 

-- 
Dr. Geo http://drgeo.eu




Re: [Pharo-dev] 32 bits and 64 bits VM

2014-05-15 Thread Hilaire Fernandes
Are you sure?
Because VM fetched with curl get.pharo.org/vmLatest | bash has no
working keypad.

Hilaire

Le 15/05/2014 00:46, Esteban Lorenzano a écrit :
 and is integrated but still not promoted to stable (I think it will be
 next week). In the mean time, vmLatest will work.
 

-- 
Dr. Geo http://drgeo.eu




Re: [Pharo-dev] 32 bits and 64 bits VM

2014-05-15 Thread p...@highoctane.be
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Hilaire Fernandes 
hilaire.fernan...@gmail.com wrote:

 Is your build done against not too recent libc et al. ?
 If so I will be interested to have an archive of it.


I've sent you a dropbox link. The thing is uploading now.

Tell me how it works.
Phil


 Thanks

 Le 14/05/2014 22:28, p...@highoctane.be a écrit :
 
  Keypad works on my linux build. There was a lost commit somewhere and I
  fwded the file to Esteban for integration.

 --
 Dr. Geo http://drgeo.eu





Re: [Pharo-dev] 32 bits and 64 bits VM

2014-05-15 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
damn… I was sure. I need to check now :)

Esteban

On 15 May 2014, at 09:21, Hilaire Fernandes hilaire.fernan...@gmail.com wrote:

 Are you sure?
 Because VM fetched with curl get.pharo.org/vmLatest | bash has no
 working keypad.
 
 Hilaire
 
 Le 15/05/2014 00:46, Esteban Lorenzano a écrit :
 and is integrated but still not promoted to stable (I think it will be
 next week). In the mean time, vmLatest will work.
 
 
 -- 
 Dr. Geo http://drgeo.eu
 
 




Re: [Pharo-dev] 32 bits and 64 bits VM

2014-05-15 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
so yes… I integrated the fix, created a pull request, waited until validation… 
and then I forget to merge :S
it should be in process to build now. 

Esteban

On 15 May 2014, at 10:44, Esteban Lorenzano esteba...@gmail.com wrote:

 damn… I was sure. I need to check now :)
 
 Esteban
 
 On 15 May 2014, at 09:21, Hilaire Fernandes hilaire.fernan...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 
 Are you sure?
 Because VM fetched with curl get.pharo.org/vmLatest | bash has no
 working keypad.
 
 Hilaire
 
 Le 15/05/2014 00:46, Esteban Lorenzano a écrit :
 and is integrated but still not promoted to stable (I think it will be
 next week). In the mean time, vmLatest will work.
 
 
 -- 
 Dr. Geo http://drgeo.eu
 
 
 




Re: [Pharo-dev] 32 bits and 64 bits VM

2014-05-15 Thread Esteban Lorenzano

On 15 May 2014, at 10:52, p...@highoctane.be wrote:

 On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Esteban Lorenzano esteba...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 damn… I was sure. I need to check now :)
 
 Hey, when will we get a CentOS 6.x slave running? ;-) [sorry, couldn't 
 resist. But, truth be told, having a CentOS version helps with credibility 
 when it comes to the enterprise - My clients aren't using Ubuntu for sure, it 
 is CentOS/RHEL with a LooongTS)

well… it will be when I finish :)
right now I’m working on the debian weezy slave (but AFAIK, builds there should 
work also on centos, I’m not sure… anyway I will check once finished and if 
not, I will prepare the centos slave). 

Esteban

 
 One tiny glitch I noticed is that my PharoVM running on CentOS6 doesn't 
 catches all keys under VMWare Workstation when I run it in a window. When 
 VMWare is fullscreen, there is no issue at all.
 The keys do work fine in a linux terminal, so this is linked to the PharoVM 
 as well.
 
 
 Phil
 
 Esteban
 
 On 15 May 2014, at 09:21, Hilaire Fernandes hilaire.fernan...@gmail.com 
 wrote:
 
  Are you sure?
  Because VM fetched with curl get.pharo.org/vmLatest | bash has no
  working keypad.
 
  Hilaire
 
  Le 15/05/2014 00:46, Esteban Lorenzano a écrit :
  and is integrated but still not promoted to stable (I think it will be
  next week). In the mean time, vmLatest will work.
 
 
  --
  Dr. Geo http://drgeo.eu
 
 
 
 
 



Re: [Pharo-dev] 32 bits and 64 bits VM

2014-05-15 Thread Hilaire Fernandes
Great.

As we are discussing about build, is it possible to compile CogVM on 64
bits architecture as it is already the case for the interpreted SqueakVM
(https://packages.debian.org/sid/squeak-vm)?

Hilaire

Le 15/05/2014 18:24, Esteban Lorenzano a écrit :
 so yes… I integrated the fix, created a pull request, waited until 
 validation… and then I forget to merge :S
 it should be in process to build now. 

-- 
Dr. Geo http://drgeo.eu




Re: [Pharo-dev] 32 bits and 64 bits VM

2014-05-14 Thread Clément Bera
Hello,

The work to port Pharo to 64 bits has started.

The new memory manager Spur will be ported to Pharo 4 alpha next week and
it supports 64 bits (this is fresh news, it has been decided 3 hours ago).
This was one of the main issue for the 64 bits port.

Now the status is to finish to port the memory manager and to compile the
VM for 64 bits. There is a bit a debugging to do as even if the 64bits Spur
memory manager is implemented it has never been debugged. In addition, some
plugins are 32 bits dependent and that needs to be fixed.

At this point, which should be in the late summer if Esteban and Eliot are
very productive, we should have a 64 bits stack VM.

Then there are 2 remaining points, one is to port the JIT to support x86_64
bits and the other is to add faster floating pointer in 64 bits. Adding
fast floating pointer is important as 64bits images are typically 30%
slower than 32bits ones due to Pharo computation being mainly pointers
computation, and that manipulating 64 bits is more expensive than 32 bits.

At this point, which is probably around christmas if everything goes well,
we should have a 64bits Cog VM.

Now this is the optimistic planning. It may be that we have the 64 bits
Stack VM for Christmas and the 64 bits Cog VM in a year. It depends if you
prefer the optimistic or the pessimistic planning.



Right now, people have issue with 64bits vs 32bits in Linux (I saw several
reports on the mailing list) but it seems it is not a problem in Windows
and Mac. Microsoft and Apple may be providing better support for 32 bits. I
don't know.



I don't know about the working keypad. Perhaps someone more aware could
help.


2014-05-14 21:08 GMT+02:00 Hilaire Fernandes hilaire.fernan...@gmail.com:

 Yesterday my boss asked me to see DrGeo on his Ununtu 14.04LTS 64 bits
 machine. I could not get it working, 32 bits compatibility package to
 run 32bits application on 64bits system is gone, you have to find out
 manually the needed 32 bits libs and install it.

 Now I don't want to face this situation anymore, I want to provide with
 DrGeo a VM for each word size, compiled with not recent libc et al. and
 a working keypad. It is the bare minimum to not look ridiculous.
 By the way, the situation would have been equally ridiculous showing
 Pharo3.

 Now, I wonder, how is deal the 32bits/64bits situation on Windows and
 Mac OSX?

 Hilaire


 --
 Dr. Geo http://drgeo.eu





Re: [Pharo-dev] 32 bits and 64 bits VM

2014-05-14 Thread Yuriy Tymchuk
For me this are good news. Thank you for your work.

Cheers.
Uko


On 14 May 2014, at 21:43, Clément Bera bera.clem...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello,
 
 The work to port Pharo to 64 bits has started.
 
 The new memory manager Spur will be ported to Pharo 4 alpha next week and it 
 supports 64 bits (this is fresh news, it has been decided 3 hours ago). This 
 was one of the main issue for the 64 bits port.
 
 Now the status is to finish to port the memory manager and to compile the VM 
 for 64 bits. There is a bit a debugging to do as even if the 64bits Spur 
 memory manager is implemented it has never been debugged. In addition, some 
 plugins are 32 bits dependent and that needs to be fixed.
 
 At this point, which should be in the late summer if Esteban and Eliot are 
 very productive, we should have a 64 bits stack VM.
 
 Then there are 2 remaining points, one is to port the JIT to support x86_64 
 bits and the other is to add faster floating pointer in 64 bits. Adding fast 
 floating pointer is important as 64bits images are typically 30% slower than 
 32bits ones due to Pharo computation being mainly pointers computation, and 
 that manipulating 64 bits is more expensive than 32 bits.
 
 At this point, which is probably around christmas if everything goes well, we 
 should have a 64bits Cog VM. 
 
 Now this is the optimistic planning. It may be that we have the 64 bits Stack 
 VM for Christmas and the 64 bits Cog VM in a year. It depends if you prefer 
 the optimistic or the pessimistic planning.
 
 
 
 Right now, people have issue with 64bits vs 32bits in Linux (I saw several 
 reports on the mailing list) but it seems it is not a problem in Windows and 
 Mac. Microsoft and Apple may be providing better support for 32 bits. I don't 
 know.
 
 
 
 I don't know about the working keypad. Perhaps someone more aware could help.
 
 
 2014-05-14 21:08 GMT+02:00 Hilaire Fernandes hilaire.fernan...@gmail.com:
 Yesterday my boss asked me to see DrGeo on his Ununtu 14.04LTS 64 bits
 machine. I could not get it working, 32 bits compatibility package to
 run 32bits application on 64bits system is gone, you have to find out
 manually the needed 32 bits libs and install it.
 
 Now I don't want to face this situation anymore, I want to provide with
 DrGeo a VM for each word size, compiled with not recent libc et al. and
 a working keypad. It is the bare minimum to not look ridiculous.
 By the way, the situation would have been equally ridiculous showing Pharo3.
 
 Now, I wonder, how is deal the 32bits/64bits situation on Windows and
 Mac OSX?
 
 Hilaire
 
 
 --
 Dr. Geo http://drgeo.eu
 
 
 



Re: [Pharo-dev] 32 bits and 64 bits VM

2014-05-14 Thread p...@highoctane.be
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 9:43 PM, Clément Bera bera.clem...@gmail.comwrote:

 Hello,

 The work to port Pharo to 64 bits has started.

 The new memory manager Spur will be ported to Pharo 4 alpha next week and
 it supports 64 bits (this is fresh news, it has been decided 3 hours ago).
 This was one of the main issue for the 64 bits port.

 Now the status is to finish to port the memory manager and to compile the
 VM for 64 bits. There is a bit a debugging to do as even if the 64bits Spur
 memory manager is implemented it has never been debugged. In addition, some
 plugins are 32 bits dependent and that needs to be fixed.

 At this point, which should be in the late summer if Esteban and Eliot are
 very productive, we should have a 64 bits stack VM.

 Then there are 2 remaining points, one is to port the JIT to support
 x86_64 bits and the other is to add faster floating pointer in 64 bits.
 Adding fast floating pointer is important as 64bits images are typically
 30% slower than 32bits ones due to Pharo computation being mainly pointers
 computation, and that manipulating 64 bits is more expensive than 32 bits.

 At this point, which is probably around christmas if everything goes well,
 we should have a 64bits Cog VM.

 Now this is the optimistic planning. It may be that we have the 64 bits
 Stack VM for Christmas and the 64 bits Cog VM in a year. It depends if you
 prefer the optimistic or the pessimistic planning.



 Right now, people have issue with 64bits vs 32bits in Linux (I saw several
 reports on the mailing list) but it seems it is not a problem in Windows
 and Mac. Microsoft and Apple may be providing better support for 32 bits. I
 don't know.


Keypad works on my linux build. There was a lost commit somewhere and I
fwded the file to Esteban for integration.

Phil




 I don't know about the working keypad. Perhaps someone more aware could
 help.


 2014-05-14 21:08 GMT+02:00 Hilaire Fernandes hilaire.fernan...@gmail.com
 :

 Yesterday my boss asked me to see DrGeo on his Ununtu 14.04LTS 64 bits
 machine. I could not get it working, 32 bits compatibility package to
 run 32bits application on 64bits system is gone, you have to find out
 manually the needed 32 bits libs and install it.

 Now I don't want to face this situation anymore, I want to provide with
 DrGeo a VM for each word size, compiled with not recent libc et al. and
 a working keypad. It is the bare minimum to not look ridiculous.
 By the way, the situation would have been equally ridiculous showing
 Pharo3.

 Now, I wonder, how is deal the 32bits/64bits situation on Windows and
 Mac OSX?

 Hilaire


 --
 Dr. Geo http://drgeo.eu






Re: [Pharo-dev] 32 bits and 64 bits VM

2014-05-14 Thread Norbert Hartl
Hilaire,

Am 14.05.2014 um 21:08 schrieb Hilaire Fernandes hilaire.fernan...@gmail.com:

 Yesterday my boss asked me to see DrGeo on his Ununtu 14.04LTS 64 bits
 machine. I could not get it working, 32 bits compatibility package to
 run 32bits application on 64bits system is gone, you have to find out
 manually the needed 32 bits libs and install it.
 
ubuntu 14.04 changed to way catalogs are loaded. i386 is not included by 
default. Please try 

sudo dpkg --add-architecture i386

and then

apt-get update 

and then try to install again. I noticed that a few weeks before, told it 
Damien and he immediately put it on the website to prevent exactly your 
situation. Please reconsider looking at

http://www.pharo-project.org/pharo-download/ubuntu

and tell me if it is working. 

Norbert


 Now I don't want to face this situation anymore, I want to provide with
 DrGeo a VM for each word size, compiled with not recent libc et al. and
 a working keypad. It is the bare minimum to not look ridiculous.
 By the way, the situation would have been equally ridiculous showing Pharo3.
 
 Now, I wonder, how is deal the 32bits/64bits situation on Windows and
 Mac OSX?
 
 Hilaire
 
 
 -- 
 Dr. Geo http://drgeo.eu