Well, so far I did not yet investigate all that part. I'm actually
experimenting on a new monkey implementation that has the following
objectives:
- easy to configure and run locally
- faster. It should be able to run build validations in parallel
(e.g., in my prototype tests run by 4
Le 4/8/16 à 18:39, Yuriy Tymchuk a écrit :
Hi,
At the moment I am moving Pharo quality tools to Renraku model. This is a
quality model that I’ve been working on and that was used so far by
QualityAssistant.
At the moment I’m stuck while trying to do changes in Monkey, as it is really
hard
> On 05 Aug 2016, at 10:49, Guille Polito wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
>
> Original Message
>> Hi,
>>
>> At the moment I am moving Pharo quality tools to Renraku model. This is a
>> quality model that I’ve been working on and that was used so far by
>>
Hi!
Original Message
Hi,
At the moment I am moving Pharo quality tools to Renraku model. This is a
quality model that I’ve been working on and that was used so far by
QualityAssistant.
Cool, I'm interested on that. Do you have some examples, docs?
At the moment I’m
2016-08-04 18:39 GMT+02:00 Yuriy Tymchuk :
> Hi,
>
> At the moment I am moving Pharo quality tools to Renraku model. This is a
> quality model that I’ve been working on and that was used so far by
> QualityAssistant.
>
> At the moment I’m stuck while trying to do changes in
Hi,
At the moment I am moving Pharo quality tools to Renraku model. This is a
quality model that I’ve been working on and that was used so far by
QualityAssistant.
At the moment I’m stuck while trying to do changes in Monkey, as it is really
hard to understand how quality checks are made