Re: [Pharo-dev] Stepping through with GLORP Proxies

2014-06-24 Thread stepharo
On 24/6/14 08:18, stepharo wrote: Esteban I would like to know how different are the Glorp proxies from the ones of Mariano. Because we are thinking about to get by default a nice proxy system. Proxies in the sense of object representing one that is not in the system (and not proxies as

Re: [Pharo-dev] Stepping through with GLORP Proxies

2014-06-24 Thread stepharo
Esteban I would like to know how different are the Glorp proxies from the ones of Mariano. Because we are thinking about to get by default a nice proxy system. Proxies in the sense of object representing one that is not in the system (and not proxies as metaobject or representing an object

Re: [Pharo-dev] Stepping through with GLORP Proxies

2014-06-24 Thread Esteban A. Maringolo
Hi Stef, 2014-06-24 3:18 GMT-03:00 stepharo steph...@free.fr: Esteban I would like to know how different are the Glorp proxies from the ones of Mariano. Because we are thinking about to get by default a nice proxy system. Proxies in the sense of object representing one that is not in the

Re: [Pharo-dev] Stepping through with GLORP Proxies

2014-06-24 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
On 24 Jun 2014, at 09:58, Esteban A. Maringolo emaring...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Stef, 2014-06-24 3:18 GMT-03:00 stepharo steph...@free.fr: Esteban I would like to know how different are the Glorp proxies from the ones of Mariano. Because we are thinking about to get by default a nice

Re: [Pharo-dev] Stepping through with GLORP Proxies

2014-06-24 Thread Eliot Miranda
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Esteban A. Maringolo emaring...@gmail.com wrote: Eliot, I never installed your proposed changes in a Pharo 3 image because there is a significant change in ContextPart. Your proposed changeset changes classVars of ContextPart. Your proposal:

Re: [Pharo-dev] Stepping through with GLORP Proxies

2014-06-23 Thread Esteban A. Maringolo
Eliot, I never installed your proposed changes in a Pharo 3 image because there is a significant change in ContextPart. Your proposed changeset changes classVars of ContextPart. Your proposal: classVariableNames: 'MaxLengthForASingleDebugLogReport MaxStackDepthForASingleDebugLogReport

Re: [Pharo-dev] Stepping through with GLORP Proxies

2014-06-23 Thread Eliot Miranda
Hi Esteban, On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Esteban A. Maringolo emaring...@gmail.com wrote: Eliot, I never installed your proposed changes in a Pharo 3 image because there is a significant change in ContextPart. Your proposed changeset changes classVars of ContextPart. Your proposal:

Re: [Pharo-dev] Stepping through with GLORP Proxies

2014-06-23 Thread Esteban A. Maringolo
2014-06-23 16:28 GMT-03:00 Eliot Miranda eliot.mira...@gmail.com: Hi Esteban, I never installed your proposed changes in a Pharo 3 image because there is a significant change in ContextPart. Your proposed changeset changes classVars of ContextPart. Would you mind adapting your mirror

Re: [Pharo-dev] Stepping through with GLORP Proxies

2014-06-23 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
On 23 Jun 2014, at 16:49, Esteban A. Maringolo emaring...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-06-23 16:28 GMT-03:00 Eliot Miranda eliot.mira...@gmail.com: Hi Esteban, I never installed your proposed changes in a Pharo 3 image because there is a significant change in ContextPart. Your proposed changeset

Re: [Pharo-dev] Stepping through with GLORP Proxies

2014-06-23 Thread Esteban A. Maringolo
2014-06-23 16:59 GMT-03:00 Esteban Lorenzano esteba...@gmail.com: sad, but understandable. in any case, it is a work for the pharo *community*, not for the consortium. things that would help: - an entry in the issue tracker - an explanation of the use case needed to solve - a pointer to

Re: [Pharo-dev] Stepping through with GLORP Proxies

2014-06-23 Thread Chris Muller
What specific problem are you having debugging? Stepping Through a block which about to send message to a Proxy? It seems like I should be having the same problem with Magma proxies.. I know sometimes I would get a Simulation error while stepping Through (which would blow up a debugging

Re: [Pharo-dev] Stepping through with GLORP Proxies

2014-06-23 Thread Eliot Miranda
Hi Chris, On Jun 23, 2014, at 2:05 PM, Chris Muller asquea...@gmail.com wrote: What specific problem are you having debugging? Stepping Through a block which about to send message to a Proxy? It seems like I should be having the same problem with Magma proxies.. I know sometimes I would

Re: [Pharo-dev] Stepping through with GLORP Proxies

2014-02-26 Thread Esteban A. Maringolo
Hi Eliot, 2013-11-30 18:30 GMT-03:00 Eliot Miranda eliot.mira...@gmail.com: On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Esteban A. Maringolo emaring...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/11/29 Eliot Miranda eliot.mira...@gmail.com: I'll either prepare a change set or submit. It'll get done. I can continue

Re: [Pharo-dev] Stepping through with GLORP Proxies

2014-02-26 Thread Eliot Miranda
Hi Esteban, find attached. Let me know of any problems. On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Esteban A. Maringolo emaring...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Eliot, 2013-11-30 18:30 GMT-03:00 Eliot Miranda eliot.mira...@gmail.com: On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Esteban A. Maringolo

Re: [Pharo-dev] Stepping through with GLORP Proxies

2013-12-02 Thread Eliot Miranda
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Clément Bera bera.clem...@gmail.comwrote: One thing with Pharo 3.0 is that the debugger is quite different than it used to be. It is now split into a model (DebugSession + DebugContext) and the view, SpecDebugger. I don't know what Eliot does have to change

Re: [Pharo-dev] Stepping through with GLORP Proxies

2013-12-02 Thread Clément Bera
Ok then the latest Pharo 3 that you can find here: https://ci.inria.fr/pharo/job/Pharo-3.0-Update-Step-4-Publish/ is the best image for this fix. However being the bleeding edge this image is stable but might have some issues. 2013/12/2 Eliot Miranda eliot.mira...@gmail.com On Sun, Dec 1,

Re: [Pharo-dev] Stepping through with GLORP Proxies

2013-12-01 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
Hi eliot why in pharo 2.0? Do you have some specific scenario? Because it would be better to have it in Pharo 30 alpha. Stef On Nov 30, 2013, at 10:30 PM, Eliot Miranda eliot.mira...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Esteban A. Maringolo emaring...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [Pharo-dev] Stepping through with GLORP Proxies

2013-12-01 Thread Esteban A. Maringolo
2013/12/1 Stéphane Ducasse stephane.duca...@inria.fr: Hi eliot why in pharo 2.0? Do you have some specific scenario? Because it would be better to have it in Pharo 30 alpha. In ten days I'll put a system into production (cross your fingers). It is built with Pharo 2 (what else?). So having

Re: [Pharo-dev] Stepping through with GLORP Proxies

2013-12-01 Thread Stéphane Ducasse
On Dec 1, 2013, at 6:11 PM, Esteban A. Maringolo emaring...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/12/1 Stéphane Ducasse stephane.duca...@inria.fr: Hi eliot why in pharo 2.0? Do you have some specific scenario? Because it would be better to have it in Pharo 30 alpha. In ten days I'll put a system into

Re: [Pharo-dev] Stepping through with GLORP Proxies

2013-12-01 Thread Clément Bera
One thing with Pharo 3.0 is that the debugger is quite different than it used to be. It is now split into a model (DebugSession + DebugContext) and the view, SpecDebugger. I don't know what Eliot does have to change but the new code may require some extra work due to the debugger being different.

Re: [Pharo-dev] Stepping through with GLORP Proxies

2013-12-01 Thread David T. Lewis
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 01:02:53PM -0800, Eliot Miranda wrote: Does the Pharo debugger use the mirror primitives yet? Unless InstructionStream and ContextPart have been updated to use objectClass: and objectInstVarAt: et al then the debugger will be fooled by proxies. I really need to push

Re: [Pharo-dev] Stepping through with GLORP Proxies

2013-11-30 Thread Eliot Miranda
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Esteban A. Maringolo emaring...@gmail.comwrote: 2013/11/29 Eliot Miranda eliot.mira...@gmail.com: On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Marcus Denker marcus.den...@inria.fr wrote: On 29 Nov 2013, at 22:03, Eliot Miranda eliot.mira...@gmail.com wrote: Does

Re: [Pharo-dev] Stepping through with GLORP Proxies

2013-11-30 Thread Clément Bera
Hello, 2013/11/30 Eliot Miranda eliot.mira...@gmail.com On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Esteban A. Maringolo emaring...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/11/29 Eliot Miranda eliot.mira...@gmail.com: On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Marcus Denker marcus.den...@inria.fr wrote: On 29 Nov 2013,

[Pharo-dev] Stepping through with GLORP Proxies

2013-11-29 Thread Esteban A. Maringolo
Does anybody else have issues while stepping through GLORP Proxy objects (collections in this case)? I simply can't use this feature unless the proxied collection was already materialized. I can't reproduce it right now, but it bites me everytime is step through blocks, because stepping into is

Re: [Pharo-dev] Stepping through with GLORP Proxies

2013-11-29 Thread Eliot Miranda
Does the Pharo debugger use the mirror primitives yet? Unless InstructionStream and ContextPart have been updated to use objectClass: and objectInstVarAt: et al then the debugger will be fooled by proxies. I really need to push this code through to Squeak trunk. Once I've done that (Monday?

Re: [Pharo-dev] Stepping through with GLORP Proxies

2013-11-29 Thread Marcus Denker
On 29 Nov 2013, at 22:03, Eliot Miranda eliot.mira...@gmail.com wrote: Does the Pharo debugger use the mirror primitives yet? No. I think the methods are not even in the image. Unless InstructionStream and ContextPart have been updated to use objectClass: and objectInstVarAt: et al then

Re: [Pharo-dev] Stepping through with GLORP Proxies

2013-11-29 Thread Eliot Miranda
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Marcus Denker marcus.den...@inria.frwrote: On 29 Nov 2013, at 22:03, Eliot Miranda eliot.mira...@gmail.com wrote: Does the Pharo debugger use the mirror primitives yet? No. I think the methods are not even in the image. Unless InstructionStream and

Re: [Pharo-dev] Stepping through with GLORP Proxies

2013-11-29 Thread Frank Shearar
On 29 November 2013 21:02, Eliot Miranda eliot.mira...@gmail.com wrote: Does the Pharo debugger use the mirror primitives yet? Unless InstructionStream and ContextPart have been updated to use objectClass: and objectInstVarAt: et al then the debugger will be fooled by proxies. I really need

Re: [Pharo-dev] Stepping through with GLORP Proxies

2013-11-29 Thread Esteban A. Maringolo
2013/11/29 Eliot Miranda eliot.mira...@gmail.com: On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Marcus Denker marcus.den...@inria.fr wrote: On 29 Nov 2013, at 22:03, Eliot Miranda eliot.mira...@gmail.com wrote: Does the Pharo debugger use the mirror primitives yet? No. I think the methods are not even in