Well, I run a consulting firm and if I could make money from developing
software on Pharo, I’d be willing to join the Consortium as a Gold member. I’d
love to develop using Smalltalk. I do proof of concepts in Smalltalk frequently
and deploy in other languages.
I would think that a company
In the pharo board we have discussed several times the LTS thingy.
As others said, problem with this is it costs time, and time is money (that we
do not have for the moment).
It is certainly something in our horizon, but for now is just not possible.
I don’t know which kind of applications
Hi,
We use Pharo as a development environment and we run a business. So, for us
stability and an LTS version makes sense.
I think there should be a compromise. The Ubuntu LTS model is a compromise
in a sense because the releases between the LTS versions include the newer
/ more experimental
So you earn money with pharo? Isn’t that a bit risky if you don’t have someone
to ask if you have a critical problem? That is what you get when you pay into
the consortium. Is it that you demand that from the mailing list and the people
that work in their free time?
Norbert
> Am 12.04.2019
How much are you ready to pay for LTS?
BTW Pharo on knowroaming servers is super super super stable. This is the guy
in charge of pharo there that told us this during Pharodays.
Stef
> On 12 Apr 2019, at 03:06, john pfersich wrote:
>
> +1 on the long term support idea. Changing an
+1 on the long term support idea. Changing an application every year to support
a new version of Pharo is a nonstarter for most of my clients.
/*—-*/
Sent from my iPhone
https://boincstats.com/signature/-1/user/51616339056/sig.png
See https://objectnets.net and
I second that.
A locked up Pharo IDE is infuriating. A dead/broken keyboard is proof of
this.
I have been using Jetbrains IDEA for a while now and love the embedded
terminal, the Ctrl-Tab for tools and Ctrl-f12 for jumping to a method + the
shift shift global search (kind of spotter) that
> Am 11.04.2019 um 15:29 schrieb Mariano Martinez Peck :
>
> Hi Esteban,
>
> We talk this privately a couple of weeks ago, but I thought it was worth
> writing again here. As for other IDE's being enjoyable, I can only talk about
> VASmalltalk. If there is ONE thing I enjoy from it, is the
+1 on the long term support and stability topic.
... and if I remember correctly, either Stephane or Marcus once talked
about plans for some kind of LTS version at ESUG two or three years ago...?
Am 11.04.19 um 15:29 schrieb Mariano Martinez Peck:
Hi Esteban,
We talk this privately a
Hi Esteban,
We talk this privately a couple of weeks ago, but I thought it was worth
writing again here. As for other IDE's being enjoyable, I can only talk
about VASmalltalk. If there is ONE thing I enjoy from it, is the stability.
May be ugly, may be too-windows, may be full of menus you don't
10 matches
Mail list logo
