On 15 Jul 2014, at 11:50, Tim Mackinnon tamackin...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the tip Ben - yes Cases xxx looks like what I wanted (and I just
tried it). Its a bit difficult to know this is available so I wanted to add
it to the Pharo Fogbugz wiki but I can't edit that (it also looks like
Thanks Marcus - I will use it carefully and try and improve anything I find
as I relearn things.
--
View this message in context:
http://forum.world.st/Should-I-be-reporting-bugs-in-Pharo-3-0-tp4767284p4768079.html
Sent from the Pharo Smalltalk Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Tim Mackinnon wrote:
Can I check one more item - should I record the actual Image version where
bugs occur?
In fogbugz, there is a version field - but I'm not sure what your convention
is for these things? (Is it written down somewhere for me to read how to
report good bugs using FogBugz).
As
Thanks for the fog bugz tips.
Duplicating a bug is useful for several reasons I've found in the past:
A) if you want to submit the same bug for two streams (eg Pharo 3 4) to be
dealt with differently - copying them is handy.
B) if you have a similar bug with similar steps bar 1, or a bug fix
Can I check one more item - should I record the actual Image version where
bugs occur?
In fogbugz, there is a version field - but I'm not sure what your convention
is for these things? (Is it written down somewhere for me to read how to
report good bugs using FogBugz).
As an aside - I'm quite
Nicolai - I have just seen that you have a fix for one of the Nautilus issues
I raised (awesome).
Forgive me - but I don't yet know how to load up a slice and test it (but am
willing to learn, so I can perhaps help more in the future).
I've loaded up the latest Pharo 4.0 image - luanched
Phil - I think your message ended up in the wrong thread?
You should try and attend ESUG though - its a great conference. I found a cheap
hotel on Booking.com - but I bet there might a YMC or something in Cambridge
that might make it more affordable (I recall people doing something similar in
Nicolai - your instructions worked perfectly (thanks - I'm a smaller step
closer to contributing).
I tried the slice in a fresh image and hit some strange problems (might not
be related to your fix, although its only when I load that I see them). I've
put it in the FobFubgz and reassigned it back
On 09 Jul 2014, at 23:08, Tim Mackinnon tamackin...@gmail.com wrote:
Just to clarify - should I just submit for 4.0 and make a note that it
applies to 3.0 and then you guys can make a duplicate?
Or should I make a duplicate? If its me - how do I duplicate a bug in
fogbugz - I can't see an
On 10 Jul 2014, at 08:52, Marcus Denker marcus.den...@inria.fr wrote:
On 09 Jul 2014, at 23:08, Tim Mackinnon tamackin...@gmail.com wrote:
Just to clarify - should I just submit for 4.0 and make a note that it
applies to 3.0 and then you guys can make a duplicate?
Or should I make a
2014-07-09 22:51 GMT+02:00 Tim Mackinnon tamackin...@gmail.com:
OK - will do.
I am finding that Nautilus in Pharo 3 is very flakey - its very easy to get
into a position where you cant select anything in the package or class pane
- and you just get walkbacks making it unusable. I'm surprised
Hi Nicolai - I should have added that I like the direction that Nautilus is
going (and it looks cool) - there is a lot of potential particularly if the
code underneath is clean (my experience with the browser code from Squeak,
was that it was messy - and seemed to have been ported through several
I don't want to create lots of noise - or create unnecessary work, but if I
find bugs in Pharo 3.0, should I be reporting them?
Or do you want me to try and repro them in 4.0 and then report them under
4.0?
For example, I have a class that was a subclass of CustomHelp that overrode
the class
2014-07-09 21:48 GMT+02:00 Tim Mackinnon tamackin...@gmail.com:
I've also noticed I keep getting re-prompted to enter my username when I
save
source (this is a very fresh image) - I think it may be because I've just
saved comments and class methods so far - but its prompted me several times
OK - will do.
I am finding that Nautilus in Pharo 3 is very flakey - its very easy to get
into a position where you cant select anything in the package or class pane
- and you just get walkbacks making it unusable. I'm surprised its not been
noticed already.
Tim
--
View this message in
Just to clarify - should I just submit for 4.0 and make a note that it
applies to 3.0 and then you guys can make a duplicate?
Or should I make a duplicate? If its me - how do I duplicate a bug in
fogbugz - I can't see an option to do it (and would expect it to link the
two)
Tim
--
View this
2014-07-09 23:08 GMT+02:00 Tim Mackinnon tamackin...@gmail.com:
Just to clarify - should I just submit for 4.0 and make a note that it
applies to 3.0 and then you guys can make a duplicate?
Or should I make a duplicate? If its me - how do I duplicate a bug in
fogbugz - I can't see an option
17 matches
Mail list logo
