And I think that his remark makes sense. I was wondering if we should
not ressurect
the RePlugin to make sure that users can use perlish regexp and do
not feel that our world is strange.
+1
+23
I've been using regexes casually for years and yet every time I use
them in Pharo I have
> Am 02.03.2017 um 09:54 schrieb Peter Uhnak :
>
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 09:20:12AM +0100, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
>>
>>> On 1 Mar 2017, at 22:40, stepharong wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> And I think that his remark makes sense. I was wondering if we should not
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 09:20:12AM +0100, Esteban Lorenzano wrote:
>
> > On 1 Mar 2017, at 22:40, stepharong wrote:
> >
> >
> > And I think that his remark makes sense. I was wondering if we should not
> > ressurect
> > the RePlugin to make sure that users can use perlish
> On 1 Mar 2017, at 22:40, stepharong wrote:
>
>
> And I think that his remark makes sense. I was wondering if we should not
> ressurect
> the RePlugin to make sure that users can use perlish regexp and do not feel
> that our world is strange.
+1
Torsten
Olivier in our team that is perl freaks from time to time, told me that
this is
sad that Pharo regexp are not compatible with the "standard" = rePlugin.
And I think that his remark makes sense. I was wondering if we should not
ressurect
the RePlugin to make sure that users can use