Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-dev] [ANN] Regex Tester Tool for Pharo

2017-03-04 Thread stepharong
And I think that his remark makes sense. I was wondering if we should not ressurect the RePlugin to make sure that users can use perlish regexp and do not feel that our world is strange. +1 +23 I've been using regexes casually for years and yet every time I use them in Pharo I have

Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-dev] [ANN] Regex Tester Tool for Pharo

2017-03-02 Thread Norbert Hartl
> Am 02.03.2017 um 09:54 schrieb Peter Uhnak : > > On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 09:20:12AM +0100, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: >> >>> On 1 Mar 2017, at 22:40, stepharong wrote: >>> >>> >>> And I think that his remark makes sense. I was wondering if we should not

Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-dev] [ANN] Regex Tester Tool for Pharo

2017-03-02 Thread Peter Uhnak
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 09:20:12AM +0100, Esteban Lorenzano wrote: > > > On 1 Mar 2017, at 22:40, stepharong wrote: > > > > > > And I think that his remark makes sense. I was wondering if we should not > > ressurect > > the RePlugin to make sure that users can use perlish

Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-dev] [ANN] Regex Tester Tool for Pharo

2017-03-02 Thread Esteban Lorenzano
> On 1 Mar 2017, at 22:40, stepharong wrote: > > > And I think that his remark makes sense. I was wondering if we should not > ressurect > the RePlugin to make sure that users can use perlish regexp and do not feel > that our world is strange. +1

Re: [Pharo-users] [Pharo-dev] [ANN] Regex Tester Tool for Pharo

2017-03-01 Thread stepharong
Torsten Olivier in our team that is perl freaks from time to time, told me that this is sad that Pharo regexp are not compatible with the "standard" = rePlugin. And I think that his remark makes sense. I was wondering if we should not ressurect the RePlugin to make sure that users can use