I think that we should have a Pharo-bugs mailing list that gets notified
for each bug that is filled in fogbugz
2015-03-21 4:54 GMT-03:00 kilon alios kilon.al...@gmail.com:
Bottom line is that reporting a problem in the mailing list first makes
much more sense because
a) Way more likely to
Bottom line is that reporting a problem in the mailing list first makes
much more sense because
a) Way more likely to get an answer
b) Avoid adding to the list on non existent bugs in fogbugz
c) Bring the bug if it really exists to the attention of more people, hence
increase that chance of the
Hi Peter,
I'm not sure how to answer all those cases (did I remember a
conversation during PharoDays?).
Can you elaborate on a) and the failure? Because I remember looking at
the ability to override conflicts in Metacello by just saying:
onConflict: [:ex | ex allow ]
(for example:
here's another one
http://www.smalltalkhub.com/mc/goonsh/Prolog/main
works in pharo 2.0.
I think they are copies of AOKI Atsushi's version.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:58 AM, Hernán Morales Durand
hernan.mora...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know Prolog, but I have some links you may like:
Nice idea!
I think that we should have a Pharo-bugs mailing list that gets
notified for each bug that is filled in fogbugz
2015-03-21 4:54 GMT-03:00 kilon alios kilon.al...@gmail.com
mailto:kilon.al...@gmail.com:
Bottom line is that reporting a problem in the mailing list first
Hi,
I'm trying to load local package over git one...
basically:
Projects A and B.
A depends on B.
A loads B from its BaselineOfA, the reference points to github.
Now I have also local copy of B git repository, and I would like to
either
a) Override the load of B with local B (so the packages
Nice work.
I will reply about improvements separately.
Cheers.
Doru
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 10:18 PM, Alexandre Bergel alexandre.ber...@me.com
wrote:
Dear all,
As many of you know, Grapher is a über-cool charting engine, part of
Roassal.
For people who do not know what Grapher is, here is
Alex
Roassal is really cool now I have one question
why we cannot say
serie1pointsAndVariations :- given
series2pointsAndVariations := given
RGrapher new
axisX; axisY;
seriesWithDeviation: {serie1pointsAndVariations .
serie2pointsAndVariations};
maxXAxis: 100;
My point is why
Hi,
is it possible to hijack Configuration Browser and put there references to
my own _local_ projects?
Thanks,
Peter
d) unload all B packages, remove B github repo, load B locally
However currently I can only unload packages one at a time manually,
instead of all related to a repo.
Peter
Hi guys
I'm looking for a thread safe simple orderedcollection to be able to
concurrent add:.
We have atomicSharedQueue but it does not support access to a given element.
Stef
e) having separate baseline method which does not load github packages and
expects that they are already loaded
But since baseline only uses single method I don't see how this could be
done.
Hi,
I fully agree with your API suggestions, but I do not quite understand why
you say that it is because of the scripting that the API does not look like
this. It's the opposite I think.
When you script you want as succinct as possible (so, no moveBehind: and
stuff). And you want to gradually
Le 21/03/2015 14:08, stepharo a écrit :
Nice idea!
I think that we should have a Pharo-bugs mailing list that gets
notified for each bug that is filled in fogbugz
Yes that would be nice, when you look at bugs on fogbugz site, you do
not always see that it is discussed in the list (lot of
Hi Stef,
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 8:52 PM, stepharo steph...@free.fr wrote:
Le 21/3/15 13:58, Tudor Girba a écrit :
Hi,
I fully agree with your API suggestions, but I do not quite understand
why you say that it is because of the scripting that the API does not look
like this. It's the
Le 21/3/15 13:58, Tudor Girba a écrit :
Hi,
I fully agree with your API suggestions, but I do not quite understand
why you say that it is because of the scripting that the API does not
look like this. It's the opposite I think.
When you script you want as succinct as possible (so, no
Hi
I want to clean Nautilus and to simplify its code and functionality.
In addition I want to reduce to student load in the context of the Mooc
we will start to work on.
So I want to remove the lock mechanism and the multiple methods. This
was an experience that did not
really work. It was
But seriously, for 4.0 ?
Now ?
On 22 Mar 2015, at 00:04, Nicolai Hess nicolaih...@web.de wrote:
2015-03-21 23:02 GMT+01:00 stepharo steph...@free.fr:
Hi
I want to clean Nautilus and to simplify its code and functionality.
In addition I want to reduce to student load in the context of
2015-03-21 23:02 GMT+01:00 stepharo steph...@free.fr:
Hi
I want to clean Nautilus and to simplify its code and functionality.
In addition I want to reduce to student load in the context of the Mooc we
will start to work on.
So I want to remove the lock mechanism and the multiple methods.
There is probably not a built in way - but its open source so definitely
possible to hijack it in any way you please. You just need to do some
digging. Here is how...
1. Bring up halos on a useful button of Configuration Browser. Keep
clicking to cycle through LabelMorph, AlignmentMorph until
Note to devs: It seems setting a value is a little broken in cleanly
displaying the new value as it is typed. Only a blank field is shown, but
the value still gets set with enter.
This only happened one time. I cannot reproduce again.
cheers -ben
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Alain Rastoul alf.mmm@gmail.com
wrote:
Le 21/03/2015 14:08, stepharo a écrit :
Nice idea!
I think that we should have a Pharo-bugs mailing list that gets
notified for each bug that is filled in fogbugz
Yes that would be nice, when you look at bugs on
Le 22/03/2015 03:36, Ben Coman a écrit :
It would be nice, but btw will not address that situation. Parties
interested in the issue woudl still need to copy mail list discussion
there, or link to the mail archive of the discussion. Fogbugz should
hold case history.
cheers -ben
You are right
23 matches
Mail list logo
