member.
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rich
> To: Antique Phonograph List
> Sent: Tue, Jan 11, 2011 12:13 pm
> Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Amberola I vs III innards
>
>
> Seems that after many of those machines left the factory the retail dealer
-
From: Rich
To: Antique Phonograph List
Sent: Tue, Jan 11, 2011 12:13 pm
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Amberola I vs III innards
Seems that after many of those machines left the factory the retail dealers
swapped the mechanisms to make customers happy with the color of the machine.
On 01/11/2011
f that practice. Can you
direct me?
George P.
-Original Message-
From: Rich
To: Antique Phonograph List
Sent: Tue, Jan 11, 2011 12:13 pm
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Amberola I vs III innards
Seems that after many of those machines left the factory the retail
dealers swapped the mec
I have a 1B mech in a 1A cabinet that was original as far as the original
owners family could remember.
-Original Message-
From: Rich
To: Antique Phonograph List
Sent: Tue, Jan 11, 2011 12:13 pm
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Amberola I vs III innards
Seems that after many of those
No, I don't expect to find a period written record.
-Original Message-
From: Rich
To: Antique Phonograph List
Sent: Tue, Jan 11, 2011 12:54 pm
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Amberola I vs III innards
How do you explain original machines that have been in the same family
f that practice. Can you
>> direct me?
>>
>> George P.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Rich
>> To: Antique Phonograph List
>> Sent: Tue, Jan 11, 201
AM, gpaul2...@aol.com wrote:
I'd be most grateful to see period documentation of that practice. Can you
direct me?
George P.
-Original Message-
From: Rich
To: Antique Phonograph List
Sent: Tue, Jan 11, 2011 12:13 pm
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Amberola I vs III innards
Seems
I'd be most grateful to see period documentation of that practice. Can you
direct me?
George P.
-Original Message-
From: Rich
To: Antique Phonograph List
Sent: Tue, Jan 11, 2011 12:13 pm
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Amberola I vs III innards
Seems that after many of
mixing& matching permanently separates
mechanisms and cabinets, preventing the proper restoration of the original
machines. I'd advise against it.
George P.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Fraser
To: phono-l
Sent: Mon, Jan 10, 2011 5:14 pm
Subject: [Phono-L] Amberola
gainst it.
>
> George P.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Fraser
> To: phono-l
> Sent: Mon, Jan 10, 2011 5:14 pm
> Subject: [Phono-L] Amberola I vs III innards
>
>
>
>
> Does anyone happen to know how much difference
oper restoration of the original
machines. I'd advise against it.
George P.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Fraser
To: phono-l
Sent: Mon, Jan 10, 2011 5:14 pm
Subject: [Phono-L] Amberola I vs III innards
Does anyone happen to know how much difference there is between the g
Does anyone happen to know how much difference there is between the guts of an
Amberola I and a III? Hoping to do a swap into a Amberola I cabinet from a
messed up III I have...
Thanks...
-- Peter
pjfra...@mac.com
___
Phono-L mailing list
http://pho
12 matches
Mail list logo