I recently acquired a GEM in fantastic condition - 90-95%, in good working
order and correct C reproducer. The story that I was told is this: It came
from a family who apparently moved from London to North Carolina. It has the
typical GEM ID tag, not Edison-Bell, but supposedly has the
think the patents they controlled expired
in 1905 so machines after that were sold after that.
Hope this helps.
George
- Original Message -
From: Vinyl Visions vinyl.visi...@live.com
To: phono-l@oldcrank.org
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 12:26 PM
Subject: [Phono-L] Edison GEM Model
...@live.com
To: phono-l@oldcrank.org
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:26:37 -0500
Subject: [Phono-L] Edison GEM Model B 1903
I recently acquired a GEM in fantastic condition - 90-95%, in good working
order and correct C reproducer. The story that I was told is this: It came
from a family who
-0500
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Edison GEM Model B 1903
Hello Curt, Edison-Bell Consolidated Phonograph Company, Ltd This
London-based company was formed in London during March 1898, as a
reconstruction of the Edison-Bell Phonograph Corporation, Ltd., itself the
successor to the Edison
G160186's ID plate is the same.
From: vinyl.visi...@live.com
To: phono-l@oldcrank.org
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:49:35 -0500
Subject: Re: [Phono-L] Edison GEM Model B 1903
Since I have never studied a patent tag on a GEM before, I don't know if this
is normal:It says - Manufactured
5 matches
Mail list logo