Am 2006-05-12 10:09:46, schrieb JupiterHost.Net:
Right after rebuilding php and apache and breaking PHP funtionality for
everyone, just so you can send a semi complex MIME message? That is the
epitome of PHP's lameness and why I can't sit quietly by and not
recommend an easy to install and
Am 2006-05-12 15:39:44, schrieb JupiterHost.Net:
Why not use Perl, it has all the pros but does not have the cons :)
Oh yes it has... Perl is a memory monster...
I have no problems to soupport over 17.000 Users on 32 CPU
machine with 64 GByte of memory using apache 1.3 and php5.
Perl would
So why bother wit a language no ene knows how this crappy syntax works?
Because you are mistaken based on your preference and experience and
calling it crappy is not a very professional way to make your argument.
Again I was simply pointing out some *major* drawbacks of PHP, not doing
a
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 2006-05-12 15:39:44, schrieb JupiterHost.Net:
Why not use Perl, it has all the pros but does not have the cons :)
Oh yes it has... Perl is a memory monster...
Anything is a memory monster if the task is memory intensive.
many benchmarks of multi languages
Ron Piggott (PHP) wrote:
I came up with some code today. I started e-mailing myself file
attachments to see what my e-mail program did in preparing them and when
I opened the e-mails I changed the view to show e-mail source.
The biggest challenge is the boundary that separates the e-mail
Alister Bulman wrote:
On 12/05/06, JupiterHost.Net [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're piping a hand crafted mime message to sendmial via mail()?
You are a glutton for pain :) (and oh yeah theres about a zillion MIME
issues you've overlooked that will come back and bite you later,
gauranteed)
JupiterHost.Net wrote:
Alister Bulman wrote:
On 12/05/06, JupiterHost.Net [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're piping a hand crafted mime message to sendmial via mail()?
You are a glutton for pain :) (and oh yeah theres about a zillion MIME
issues you've overlooked that will come back and bite
What planet are you on? Seriously? Because PEAR does not need to be
compiled into PHP. Zend Optimizer is no different to the optimizers
I was referring to --with-pear, sorry compiled was not the right word *
available for other scripting languages. Version mismatches are a fact
I was
Let me start by apologising if my posts came across as personal. Check
the archives for my posts, primarily on php-general and you will see
that I have a very sarcastic personality. No offence was meant or is
meant by what follows.
JupiterHost.Net wrote:
What planet are you on? Seriously?
Stut wrote:
Let me start by apologising if my posts came across as personal. Check
If? How else can What could be easier? Not having to read your ignorant
emails. be taken?
No worries though I understand, thanks :)
What planet are you on? Seriously? Because PEAR does not need to be
JupiterHost.Net wrote:
Stut wrote:
What planet are you on? Seriously? Because PEAR does not need to be
compiled into PHP. Zend Optimizer is no different to the optimizers
I was referring to --with-pear, sorry compiled was not the right
word *
I'm not familiar with the switch you are
in PHP source:
./configure --help
I've had a look and it would appear that all that switch does is install
PEAR for you during the build process. That doesn't change the fact that
it's still just a collection of PHP classes and does not require
rebuilding of PHP to benefit from it.
sure no
I think we may have to agree to disagree. I love PHP. I've never had a
problem with it that couldn't be solved that's made me want to switch.
Just to make it clear I do try the so-called up-and-coming development
trends, and over the years have tried most of the existing systems. I
recently
Stut wrote:
I think we may have to agree to disagree. I love PHP. I've never had a
Ah I completely forgot about this sort of fun thing that I find in my
email almost once a week, just got this one:
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-460727.html
now how many phpinfo() pages do you think
] Re: Sending filing attachments using PHP
Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:53:13 -0500
Stut wrote:
I think we may have to agree to disagree. I love PHP. I've never had a
Ah I completely forgot about this sort of fun thing that I find in my email
almost once a week, just got this one:
http
Bastien Koert wrote:
php is not the only language susceptible to x-browser attacks... seems
unfair to single it out.
Why not? Its the only I've seen that actually has hackability built in!
(see below) So it singles itself out, thats the whole point :)
And as previously pointed out, many
16 matches
Mail list logo
