On Tue, 02 Jul 2002 12:57:56 +0200
Michael Bretterklieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> one point that you should keeped in mind is, if you have a cluster of
> webservers connecting to the same db-server, then you have to mount the
> filesystems, where you store the images on all webser
Hi,
one point that you should keeped in mind is, if you have a cluster of
webservers connecting to the same db-server, then you have to mount the
filesystems, where you store the images on all webservers.
On the other hand many db's like oracle have many restrictions with
lobs. In oracle you
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002 05:45:40 +0200
"Andy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is the increase of the network traffic noticable? The query is pretty small
> just text. Do u really think this might increase the traffic?
Try to heavely charge a DB with images inside it.
Do the same without DB, that depends
is the increase of the network traffic noticable? The query is pretty small
just text. Do u really think this might increase the traffic?
I also noticed that the image is not cached anymore. Is this true for all
blobs, or do I just access them in a wron way?
(I am requesting a php file in the sc
MAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP-DB] blob versus file
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 14:17:53 +0200
"andy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I am wondering if anybody has experiance in saving images to blob in mysql.
>
> I do save images with 1 K and 4 KB to blob f
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 14:17:53 +0200
"andy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I am wondering if anybody has experiance in saving images to blob in mysql.
>
> I do save images with 1 K and 4 KB to blob fields while I used to save them
> to file. It seams to me that this is much slower acce
Hi there,
I am wondering if anybody has experiance in saving images to blob in mysql.
I do save images with 1 K and 4 KB to blob fields while I used to save them
to file. It seams to me that this is much slower accessing the files. The
images take a bit (really short but absolutly noticable) to
