Hello, I have a problem connecting to an Oracle XE database. Here is my code
and the output.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/www/test cat testoci.php
getMessage();
}
?>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/www/test
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/www/test php testoci.php
Logon OK
When I navigate
On Fri, August 24, 2007 3:20 am, Goltsios Theodore wrote:
>> Please do not encourage the use of $_REQUEST.
>>
>> You might as well just tell people to enable register_globals again.
This is *SO* not correct at all!
$_REQUEST[] is merely array_merge($_GET, $_POST, $_COOKIE);
It is *NOT* in any w
On 8/26/07, Richard Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is *SO* not correct at all!
>
> $_REQUEST[] is merely array_merge($_GET, $_POST, $_COOKIE);
Yes and it mimics being lazy - allowing overriding values from $_POST
vs. $_GET vs. $_COOKIE depending on what the programmer wants to
"trust"
I
On Sun, August 26, 2007 6:37 pm, mike wrote:
> On 8/26/07, Richard Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It is *NOT* in any way, shape, or form, polluting the global
>> namespace
>> of all your variables, which is what register_globals is.
>
> That is why I said it was *one* reason register_globals w
Linux NG/Lists wrote:
From a php-general thread earlier:
generates:
Fatal error: Call to undefined function new mysqli() in index.php on
line 24
while
';
?>
generates success:
conn good: Object id #1 :very good indeed
The book I'm working with (PHP & MySQL Web Dev, Welling/T
Jason Cartledge wrote:
Hello, I have a problem connecting to an Oracle XE database. Here is my code
and the output.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/www/test cat testoci.php
getMessage();
}
?>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/www/test
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/www/test php testoci.php
Lo
> I'll say it again:
>
> regsiter_globals has *NOTHING* to do with $_REQUEST.
>
> Zero.
> Zilch.
> Nada.
> Zip.
To me it allows for the same [lazy] behavior. Period. I've had other
people agree. Say what you want about it.
> No, it only relies on one "Designer" who wants their request to look
> l
