[PHP-DEV] CVS Account Request: porcupine

I can't find the chinese document in this website. I want to know if there is somebody try to translate it to chinese. I think I can help him. I have a question "are traditional chinese and simply chinese different?". I prefer traditional chinese. -- PHP Development Mailing List

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Default Return-Path with mail() and qmail

At 21:06 7-12-2002, you wrote: A more generalized fix would be to append the Return-Path to the headers string at the top of the php_mail function so that it's caught by both the sendmail block and by the TSendMail call (MAPI). Setting Return-Path is useless. It's stripped by sendmail, unless i

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.exe - php-cgi.exe

On Sunday 08 December 2002 01:02, John Coggeshall wrote: > I think a big ole' message at the end of ./configure will drastically > reduce the number of problems. With php.exe? *g* > Also, perhaps a check could be put in the > CLI version of PHP that would throw an error message if it is being use

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.exe - php-cgi.exe

Marcus Börger wrote: >> I understand the reason why cli has to get a short name (the >> lazyness of good programmers). What i don't understand is why it has >> to be called php.exe. You force each and every user of php-cgi on >> win32 to change his webserver configuration when switching to 4.3.0.

RE: [PHP-DEV] php.exe - php-cgi.exe

>Yes that could happen...maybe we should have another *big* >message for the configure part and a *huge* message in the >release notes and news entries. This is no different than when register_globals suddenly got turned off. I think a big ole' message at the end of ./configure will drastically

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.exe - php-cgi.exe

At 00:35 08.12.2002, Christoph Grottolo wrote: Marcus Börger wrote: > Christoph Grottolo wrote: >> BTW, I still don't understand why php-cli cannot be called >> php-cli.exe on win32. Like this, many users would guess how the >> problem cgi and 4.3.0 can be solved even if they don't read php-dev >

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Latest ZE2 changes

At 16:48 07.12.2002, Zeev Suraski wrote: At 17:02 07/12/2002, Marcus Börger wrote: Hi Zeev, I have changed the test files and encountered some problems with the way you modified my patch: 1) private_002.phpt fails with 004- Fatal error: Call to private method pass::show() from context 'fail'

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.exe - php-cgi.exe

Marcus Börger wrote: > Christoph Grottolo wrote: >> BTW, I still don't understand why php-cli cannot be called >> php-cli.exe on win32. Like this, many users would guess how the >> problem cgi and 4.3.0 can be solved even if they don't read php-dev >> (or the release notes). >> >> Christoph > > Si

[PHP-DEV] CVS Account Request: haiaw

translating the documentation from english into polish -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Re: [PHP-DEV] php.exe - php-cgi.exe

At 00:02 08.12.2002, Christoph Grottolo wrote: Hi In the NEWS file for 4.3.0 there should definitly be an entry about renaming php.exe to php-cgi.exe on win32, maybe this should even be mentioned on the download page together with the release. If not, there will be many bug reports about HTTP 500

[PHP-DEV] php.exe - php-cgi.exe

Hi In the NEWS file for 4.3.0 there should definitly be an entry about renaming php.exe to php-cgi.exe on win32, maybe this should even be mentioned on the download page together with the release. If not, there will be many bug reports about HTTP 500 errors and premature end of script headers afte

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Default Return-Path with mail() and qmail

hi, > Good because I havn't seen any positive responses to this and I'm still > negative on it. You don't have to use it. > Apart from disagreement with the prinicipal here I'd also ask: "Where is > the portion of the patch to support Win32 SMTP via the MAPI interface?" > ((as opposed to sendmai

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Default Return-Path with mail() and qmail

>> Are you sure you should be using malloc()/free() and not >> emalloc()/efree()? Also please use strlcpy() instead of strncpy(). >> (Weird I mentioned it twice in one day :) >> http://www.courtesan.com/todd/papers/strlcpy.html > > Probably there are even more things broken in my patch :) I'm quit

RE: [PHP-DEV] FR: echo line

-1, no way... >-Original Message- >From: Jari Vuoksenranta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Saturday, December 07, 2002 11:57 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [PHP-DEV] FR: echo line > > >I have a feature request: I'd like to have '#' comment like >macro which would expand "_ foo" t

Re: [PHP-DEV] FR: echo line

Do you realize how ugly that is? What benifit would that have over something way more readable like: \n"; } ?> -Brad --- Jari Vuoksenranta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a feature request: I'd like to have '#' comment like > macro which would expand "_ foo" to "?> foo\n > Has this be

[PHP-DEV] FR: echo line

I have a feature request: I'd like to have '#' comment like macro which would expand "_ foo" to "?> foo\n } ?> " would echo "\t\n" to page. -- PHP Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

[PHP-DEV] Re: Default Return-Path with mail() and qmail

Hi Andi, > Are you sure you should be using malloc()/free() and not emalloc()/efree()? > Also please use strlcpy() instead of strncpy(). (Weird I mentioned it twice > in one day :) > http://www.courtesan.com/todd/papers/strlcpy.html Probably there are even more things broken in my patch :) I'm q

Re: [PHP-DEV] Default Return-Path with mail() and qmail

Are you sure you should be using malloc()/free() and not emalloc()/efree()? Also please use strlcpy() instead of strncpy(). (Weird I mentioned it twice in one day :) http://www.courtesan.com/todd/papers/strlcpy.html Andi At 04:54 PM 12/7/2002 +0100, Daniel Lorch wrote: --- php-4.2.3/ext/standar

[PHP-DEV] Re: Latest ZE2 changes

At 17:02 07/12/2002, Marcus Börger wrote: Hi Zeev, I have changed the test files and encountered some problems with the way you modified my patch: 1) private_002.phpt fails with 004- Fatal error: Call to private method pass::show() from context 'fail' in %s on line %d 004+ Fatal error: Call t

Re: [PHP-DEV] Default Return-Path with mail() and qmail

--- php-4.2.3/ext/standard/mail.c Sat Aug 24 13:38:13 2002 +++ php-4.2.3-daniel/ext/standard/mail.cMon Dec 2 01:24:35 2002 @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include "php.h" #include "ext/standard/info.h" #if !defined(PHP_WIN32) @@ -124,6 +125,84 @@ }

Re: [PHP-DEV] Default Return-Path with mail() and qmail

hi, Here's an improved version of this patch, which doesn't SEGFAULT on invalid input. Someone just brought up this topic on php-de and qmail, so I thought there is some interest in this patch .. Everbody else just ignore me :) -daniel -- PHP Development Mailing List To un

[PHP-DEV] Latest ZE2 changes

Hi Zeev, I have changed the test files and encountered some problems with the way you modified my patch: 1) private_002.phpt fails with 004- Fatal error: Call to private method pass::show() from context 'fail' in %s on line %d 004+ Fatal error: Call to public method fail::show() from context '

[PHP-DEV] PHP 4 Bug Summary Report

PHP 4 Bug Database summary - http://bugs.php.net Num Status Summary (1009 total including feature requests) ===[*Configuration Issues] 13561 Assigned --without-pear prevent install of php-config,phpize,... 19282 Won't fix Place php4ts.dl

Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: bug of the day: $this

On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 22:11, Stig S. Bakken wrote: > It won't be different in ZE2. This is not a bug though, but a tricky > design issue. The problem is figuring out at runtime when to set $this > or not in a method. What most people would probably find intuitive, is > that $this was set only in