ctx-r-handler[strlen(application/x-httpd-php)]
Is this actually the way it's supposed to work? (based on the length)?
Unless there's something I'm missing I'd prefer to see an strcmp() here. It
might be a bit slower but it's definitely more robust for future changes.
Andi
At 12:06 PM
At 11:01 AM 9/24/2002 -0400, Colin Viebrock wrote:
It obviously is not compatible with current browsers as it
is really ugly in IE and NS.
It looks pretty much identical to the way it did before in MSIE 5+ and
NS 6+ and Mozilla. It only looks ugly (i.e. not as nice as before) in
NS
Can't you make sure that the filename of internal classes will be NULL and
then we can check for it and say it's an internal class?
Andi
At 03:59 PM 9/23/2002 +0100, Wez Furlong wrote:
X-Managedo-partname: name=1.1; mimetype=text/plain
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
this is the case, but then I haven't really delved
into how it all works :-/
--Wez.
On 09/23/02, Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can't you make sure that the filename of internal classes will be NULL and
then we can check for it and say it's an internal class?
Andi
At 03:59 PM 9
At 07:22 PM 9/23/2002 +0100, Wez Furlong wrote:
Am I the only one who is getting their files chmod'ed to read-only
every time I do a CVS commit?
In particular, main/user_streams.c keeps doing this which is quite
annoying - is there some setting on the server side that affects this?
(and do we
At 11:00 AM 9/8/2002 +0100, Wez Furlong wrote:
3) will be midi functions,this is a long way off yet so I haven't given
it too much thought yet. Also it is likely to be a separate module as it
will need to link against a separate library and I can't think of any
PHP modules that link
This sounds very strange. It sounds to me as if your scanner wasn't built
correctly for some odd reason.
Andi
At 10:45 AM 9/6/2002 +0200, phpsurf wrote:
Hi
I tried the latest windows binaries of PHP with ZE2 built yesterday by Edin
on http://snaps.php.net/win32/ZE2 and there is still a bug
At 02:48 PM 9/4/2002 +0900, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
?php
$array = array('foo', 'bar');
var_export($array);
?
prints
array (
0 = 'foo',
1 = 'bar',
)
The comma after 'bar' is superfluous.
I agree, but it has been discussed
Hey,
I think you're right. Someone changed this code a while ago and might have
introduced this problem (or it was like this before).
I commited a fix and hope it doesn't break anything :)
If anyone uses llist's please make sure it's OK.
Andi
At 07:30 AM 8/27/2002 -0400, l0t3k wrote:
hi,
im
Any chance you can setup and Engine 2 build and see if this problem persists?
Andi
At 06:42 AM 8/27/2002 -0700, Michael Sisolak wrote:
--- Zeev Suraski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 09:53 27/08/2002, Michael Sisolak wrote:
i've been doing some debugging of the crashes when running php
At 05:11 PM 9/1/2002 -0700, Michael Sisolak wrote:
Andi,
I download the alpha2 version of the php-4.3.0-dev-zend2 release.
Unfortunatley out-of-the-box I got an Invalid access to memory
location. error returned when I try to view I page. I was able to
track it down to something with the
At 10:59 AM 8/21/2002 +0100, Tom Oram wrote:
Hi,
I'm currenly looking at/doing a lot of object orientated PHP so I have been
looking into what new features Zend 2 will offer me. I have just run into a
situation where if I was using Zend 2 I would need some sort of implementation
of C++ friends,
At 09:55 PM 8/19/2002 -0700, Brad LaFountain wrote:
I still think it shouldn't go in. This is the only feature in Engine 2
which might make non-OOP people convert. Once this isn't in Engine 2 we
don't have a carrot for them.
You as a Zend owner who's business could be very propitable
At 11:20 AM 8/20/2002 -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
By the way, the only personal gain I have in getting ZE2 out of there is
that it's my code and that PHP will do much better. I think that PHP is
going to loose out big time if things don't start gaining some momentum.
Backporting is
At 10:47 PM 8/20/2002 +0100, Wez Furlong wrote:
Filters are created using:
php_stream_filter_create(char *filtername, char *filterparams,
int filterparamslen, int persistent TSRMLS_DC);
filtername corresponds to the name used to register the factory;
if no exact match is found, it looks
I also think we should make sure enough people have motivation to move to
ZE2. If not it'll be hard to push it out and we all know that it's a very
important step for PHP. As it is, there is still not enough momentum behind it.
Andi
At 05:38 PM 8/18/2002 +0300, Zeev Suraski wrote:
I said
At 07:50 PM 8/18/2002 +0200, Thies C. Arntzen wrote:
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 10:29:47AM -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
I don't think we should stop people from tweaking ZE1. ZE2 is probably
more than a year away from realistically being available to a lot of
people. It takes a while for
in
c:\webroot\ze2\myfoo.php on line 2
andi ? is it not supposed to work either with extended classes ?
Can you please send me a very short script which reproduces your problem?
Thanks,
Andi
-Original Message-
From: Andi Gutmans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: mercredi 26 juin 2002
At 04:29 PM 8/3/2002 +0800, Alan Knowles wrote:
Ok, had a play with this
updated copy on
http://docs.akbkhome.com/threads.tgz
added a few of pthreads calls to TSRM.c
did most of the testing without this abstraction layer - just to see if I
could get it to work.
used php_exectute_script,
By the way, if we do end up making this kind of thing mainstream we should
probably use APR (or another library) for thread abstraction. I wouldn't
want to do all of that work over.
Andi
At 04:29 PM 8/3/2002 +0800, Alan Knowles wrote:
Ok, had a play with this
updated copy on
At 02:43 AM 7/30/2002 -0400, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Hey,
Can't you share the patch before you just go ahead and just commit it? I
still have the same issue I used to have.
Hey, the patch has been available for a long while now. :-)
I think
At 05:43 PM 8/1/2002 +0800, Alan Knowles wrote:
It's not about looking at the perl code, that will tell you nothing
unless you know perl internals. It's about the way the interpreter
works, some of the architecture, that is simular to PHP. In PHP, threads
are isolated, kind of like seperate
Theoretically these should be used when the engine is not in a stable
state (i.e. would crash on shutdown).
As this can also include PHP's code and PHP extensions I'm not really sure
how much this really helps.
Andi
At 08:04 AM 8/2/2002 -0700, Brad LaFountain wrote:
Thanks.. I figured it out
I think this is a good question.
I'm not quite sure that casting dval to long is the same as multiplying the
two longs.
Anyone know the answer?
Andi
At 02:28 PM 7/31/2002 +0200, Stefan Esser wrote:
Hi,
Could someone tell me why the Zend Engine calculates every multiplication
2 times???
clone_obj is the C handler for overloaded objects. In case of PHP objects
clone_obj calls __clone.
Andi
At 12:37 AM 7/18/2002 -0400, l0t3k wrote:
A quick question about the above...
what is the relationship between the clone_obj handler and the __clone
method. For instance, if i define the
Thanks. I've fixed this.
Andi
At 05:51 PM 7/18/2002 +0200, Sander Steffann wrote:
I think zend2_example.phps has a little error in example 6:
The display function is defined as:
function display()
{
print $this-name;
print \n;
}
But then it is called with:
At 02:05 PM 7/30/2002 -0400, Joao Prado Maia wrote:
So are we going to rename these functions because of this ? It seems kind
of weird of having ftp_async_get() when the function is not really
asynchronous ;)
If what Sterling just said is really accurate, _please_ don't release
4.3.0 with the
At 12:40 PM 8/3/2002 -0700, Shane Caraveo wrote:
Andi Gutmans wrote:
By the way, if we do end up making this kind of thing mainstream we
should probably use APR (or another library) for thread abstraction. I
wouldn't want to do all of that work over.
Andi
That would be nice, but not sure how
is a good idea. It's slow and prone to errors.
Andi
-brad
--- Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still think that if you're going to implement such a thread extension it
shouldn't try and copy it's parents data-structures. It'd be very slow and
prone to errors.
I think giving a filename
Hey,
I'm going on a four day computer-less vacation starting tomorrow morning so
I won't be reading my Email.
If you guys send patches for the Engine 2 or other queries please give me
some time to reply when I get back. I'll look them over ASAP.
Thanks,
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List
At 05:44 PM 7/10/2002 +0900, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
Hmm. This tag is only for some win32 files.
The name isn't sound good to me.
This was brought up before, and it's only needed for some files due to
incompabilities with the ZE1
That's really strange. Any chance bison is broken on Mac's?
Andi
At 06:15 PM 7/6/2002 -0700, R Blake wrote:
continuing to explore this problem, i added --disable-inline-optimization
to configure.
now configure fails with:
Thank you for using PHP.
config.status: creating php4.spec
Alan,
There was a discussion about this a long time ago and it was decided not to
support this.
The main reasoning behind this is that we don't want to start supporting
all other reserved words.
It's one of the things you'll need to cope with when moving to the Engine 2
but a very simple
At 07:03 AM 7/1/2002 +0200, Sascha Schumann wrote:
I understood the rational of using a struct from the beginning. I still in
general don't like using structs very much because as I mentioned it's not
as easy to use. I prefer having 2-3 methods then having one method which I
Well,
I'll take Pack 40.
Andi
At 03:25 PM 7/1/2002 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello QA-ers,
it's the time of the year again, time for the PHP Bug Hunt Event! Although
this is the first time, I'm pretty sure it will be fine.
What is the PHP Bug Hunt Event?
---
The
My only problem with this patch is that I don't like API's which pass
around structs. I always find it cumbersome to have to create and fill the
struct and then pass it.
Can you think of something similar without using structs?
Andi
At 01:44 PM 6/30/2002 +0200, Sascha Schumann wrote:
I
At 10:03 PM 6/30/2002 +0200, Sascha Schumann wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
My only problem with this patch is that I don't like API's which pass
around structs. I always find it cumbersome to have to create and fill the
struct and then pass it.
Can you think
delete is a keyword like isset and unset so it makes sense for it to be
without the __.
Andi
At 11:41 AM 6/27/2002 +0200, Tit \Black\ Petric wrote:
[quote ZEND_CHANGES.txt]
* Forced deletion of objects.
.. yadda ..
Note that if you have a user-defined function delete() in an old
At 08:32 AM 6/27/2002 -0700, Brian France wrote:
Hello,
I have a url that ends with ?.value=1, but PHP returns this in
$_REQUEST as _value instead of .value. I believe this is because of this code:
main/php_variables.c
104 /* ensure that we don't have spaces or dots in the
At 11:21 AM 6/27/2002 +0200, phpsurf wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Andi Gutmans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: mercredi 26 juin 2002 21:02
To: Brad LaFountain; Ivan Ristic; phpsurf
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [Zend Engine 2] RE: [PHP
Hey,
It'd be cool if phpinfo() would print its output in regular text (no HTML)
when used with the CLI version (a bonus would be to also be able to pass it
a parameter in CGI mode to select this mode).
The way phpinfo() is written this is quite easy to do as we're using
centralized print
At 10:41 PM 6/27/2002 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4. Our project uses own memory functions, since the sources will be
compiled on several different platforms. Do I have to use zend's exxx
memory functions?
No, you don't need too, but if you use them they show memory leakage when
the
I don't quite understand. Can you give us a few examples, how they are
handled by PHP today and how they would be handled by your code.
I'll start off:
0.9+0.1
0.9+0.001
8/10.0 + 0.2
I'm sure you know of juicier examples :)
Andi
At 02:33 PM 6/26/2002 +0100, George Whiffen wrote:
Oops,
Ivan,
I just commited a patch for autoloading to the CVS. It is improved over
your patch in the way I discussed (it propogates throughout Zend). I hope
it works out to work well.
CVS commit message:
- Autoloading support based on patch from Ivan Ristic.
- Again I hope this feature ends up
Hey,
What I meant was nested classes, my bad :)
I meant it won't work for Foo::Bar::Barbara but only for class Foo.
Andi
At 11:56 AM 6/26/2002 -0700, Brad LaFountain wrote:
- will never work for sub-classes so don't even ask!
Andi,
This doesn't need to be an issue. The way that I use
Hi,
This is a bug and I think I fixed it in the CVS version of the Engine.
Any chance you can grab it and check?
In any case, I just want to remind you that you will not want to return
objects by reference anymore with Engine 2 only possibly some other datatypes.
Andi
At 11:43 AM 6/24/2002
At 02:49 PM 6/24/2002 +0100, SCL List Client wrote:
Sorry Andi, I was wrong. I never managed to test the returned references using
the CVS version of PHP/Zend2 because I had assumed when I download the php4
tree from the CVS I got Zend 2, so I compiled Zend 1.x by mistake. I can't
actually get
Can you try the latest CVS version? It should be fixed there.
Let me know...
Thanks,
Andi
At 11:04 PM 6/24/2002 +0200, Marcus Boerger wrote:
Since i use ZendEngine2 i cannot use global $argc,$argv.
Example:
function somefunction() {
global $argc, $argv;
}
worked before ZE2,
At 06:44 AM 6/21/2002 -0400, fabwash wrote:
Hello,
I already sent this question, but there was no answer, and i'm afraid it
was not noticed, but if this is the wrong list, let me know :)
When you define a constant you can use two things that are not very clear
to me. Can someone explain?
1)
I don't think adding a note is a bad idea.
Andi
At 04:44 PM 6/22/2002 -0500, Sterling Hughes wrote:
Why? If you're commiting code you should know how to use these basic
functions...
besides, sprintf is not really all that bad...
-Sterling
Proposal comment for spprintf/snprintf header.
Markus,
The problem is that compile_string() will add functions and classes to
PHP's global structures. Also, if there's a parse error it can leave the
internal compiler structures in an unstable state.
I can't think of any quick and easy way of support this kind of lint
feature nor eval()
At 04:07 PM 6/18/2002 +0200, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
Ilia A. wrote:
By using a functiont that does not support lowercasing, would also cause
problems, since if a constant name contains non english characters it
would break. IMHO the best implementation is to simply not lowercase
constant
is supported. Please look it over,
hopefuly this is good enough to commit.
I've also attached a small php test script you can use to see the problem in
non patched PHPs.
Ilia
On June 15, 2002 03:25 pm, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Ilia,
I remember now the problem you're talking about. It has been discussed
Hi,
Thanks for the good bug report. I have fixed this problem in the CVS.
Andi
At 12:39 PM 6/14/2002 +0200, Hakan Kuecuekyilmaz wrote:
Hi,
following script segfaults at
in doubleloop 10/22
Segmentation fault
?php
class benchmark
{
var $index;
function benchmark($num)
{
for
Ilia,
Your patch basically makes PHP constants case sensitive.
Changing this is a very big backwards compatibility problem.
You're not supposed to register two define's with the same letters but
different case.
Andi
At 01:21 PM 6/15/2002 -0400, Ilia A. wrote:
Hello,
While developing software
Ilia,
I remember now the problem you're talking about. It has been discussed here
in the past and I don't recall us having found a good solution. Basically
we need a solution which is backwards compatible but will allow TEST and
test to co-exist if case sensitivity was chosen for them.
It's
:18 +0300
Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ilia,
I remember now the problem you're talking about. It has been discussed
here
in the past and I don't recall us having found a good solution. Basically
we need a solution which is backwards compatible but will allow TEST and
test to co
At 07:00 PM 6/13/2002 +0100, Ivan Ristic wrote:
The second problem is that I don't see it working with nested classes.
Is it good enough to only have this work with classes in the global
scope?
I am not really familiar with nested classes; is it because
you don't know the
I have two problems here.
First of all I'd prefer it to call a predefined callback called
__autoload() if a class is not found.
The second problem is that I don't see it working with nested classes.
Is it good enough to only have this work with classes in the global scope?
Andi
At 11:27 PM
At 06:53 PM 6/12/2002 +0100, Ivan Ristic wrote:
First of all I'd prefer it to call a predefined callback called
__autoload() if a class is not found.
I do not have a problem with the predefined name. However,
unserialize is already using the ini setting for the
same thing, and it
his specific needs
farther than just setting a classPath.
why don't you like this idea ? is it for performance reasons ?
-Original Message-
From: Andi Gutmans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: lundi 10 juin 2002 22:33
To: phpsurf; Ivan Ristic; Zeev Suraski
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED
At 07:55 AM 6/11/2002 -0400, l0t3k wrote:
ive been looking over the ZE2 alpha release code for clues on porting my OO
extension over to the new engine, but a few things are not clicking yet
how do i raise an exception from C. last time i asked, Andi said that it
would be sufficient to do a
It's supposed to work under the same circumstances as in Engine 1 (if you
really returned a reference) although in most cases you will now be
returning objects by value and assigning them by value. It was introduced
originally to get around the object problems the Engine 2 solved.
I'll look
This should be fixed now.
Note, that it will only work if you are returning your return value by
reference. In engine 1 doing anything else was buggy.
Andi
At 07:16 PM 6/11/2002 +0300, Andi Gutmans wrote:
It's supposed to work under the same circumstances as in Engine 1 (if you
really
At 11:27 PM 6/11/2002 +0100, Ivan Ristic wrote:
Okay, I guess I can live with it :)
Andi
Is there anyone else who would like to comment on the
patch?
http://www.webkreator.com/download/class_autoload.patch
Or can we have it committed?
Hmm, I was wondering where the patch
Can someone please help out Wez? ;)
Thanks,
Andi
From: Wez Furlong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 01:39:53 +0100
To: Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Wez Furlong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] filesystem security questions
If one of the doc guys can
I'd prefer not having a handler for autoloader. I'd prefer having the
Engine look for ClassName.php in the default include_path and if it doesn't
exist die... (i.e. not call any user-definable PHP function).
Andi
At 11:33 AM 6/10/2002 +0200, phpsurf wrote:
this patch would be really great !
Or have a user-definable classpath. But I think it's better not to call
into PHP code.
Andi
At 11:32 PM 6/10/2002 +0300, Andi Gutmans wrote:
I'd prefer not having a handler for autoloader. I'd prefer having the
Engine look for ClassName.php in the default include_path and if it
doesn't exist
At 12:53 PM 6/9/2002 -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 03:09:24AM +0300, Zeev Suraski wrote:
Hmm, but doesn't that mean that the largest contiguous block this heap
will
be able to provide is 8KB, then?
8K is just the minimum chunk size, there is no absolute maximum.
*
At 09:12 PM 6/7/2002 -0700, Brian Pane wrote:
In case it's helpful to the PHP developers, here are
some more performance problems that I found by running
a quick system call profile of PHP-4.2.1 within
Apache-2.0.37-dev:
* php_request_shutdown() calls shutdown_memory_manager(), which
does a
At 05:02 AM 6/8/2002 +0100, Michael Dransfield wrote:
At 02:40 08/06/2002 +0100, you wrote:
There are two reasons we repeat the 'PHP is not Java mantra':
(a) Many of those requesting these changes actually DO want to see PHP
as a Java with PHPish syntax.
Anyone wanting PHP to be a
At 10:41 AM 6/8/2002 +0300, Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 09:12 PM 6/7/2002 -0700, Brian Pane wrote:
In case it's helpful to the PHP developers, here are
some more performance problems that I found by running
a quick system call profile of PHP-4.2.1 within
Apache-2.0.37-dev:
* php_request_shutdown
At 12:42 PM 6/8/2002 +0200, Markus Fischer wrote:
Practically, there's no documentation about streams except
some mail Wez sent to php-dev a few weeks (months?) ago (and
the sources, of course), I hope you can find it in the
archives.
Maybe we can get Wez to write complete
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Brian Pane wrote:
IMHO, that's a design flaw. Regardless of whether PHP is doing
buffering, it shouldn't break up blocks of static content into
small pieces--especially not as small as 400 bytes. While it's
certainly
At 10:47 AM 6/8/2002 -0700, Brian Pane wrote:
Andi Gutmans wrote:
I just checked and it seems like Apache APR memory pools use mutex locking.
It'd be better to use functions like the Win32 ones which don't use mutex
locking (as we made sure that only one thread allocates from its pool
At 04:57 PM 6/8/2002 -0700, Brian Pane wrote:
Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 12:55 AM 6/9/2002, Brian Pane wrote:
I just looked through zend_alloc.c. It looks like the HeapCreate only
happens once, at startup--did I get that right?
It's called on the per-thread startup (start_memory_manager(), which
Can you check and see if using zend_hash_graceful_reverse_destroy() fixes
your problem?
Andi
At 11:44 AM 6/7/2002 -0700, Brian France wrote:
Zend Engine unloading extension in the wrong order! (Re-post due to no
response)
I have been tracking down a core dump with my php extension when it is
Any idea why I got this when posting to php-dev?
Andi
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (reject)
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2002 08:50:05 -0700
X-Autogenerated: Reply
To: Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: REJECTED: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Autogenerated
At 01:00 PM 6/7/2002 -0700, Brian France wrote:
I will try that, but I was worried that the pDestructor function would not
get called for each item like it was in zend_hash_destroy. Is this the
case? Looking at the code what is the difference between
zend_hash_graceful_destroy and
At 01:14 PM 6/7/2002 -0700, Brian France wrote:
Yes, zend_hash_graceful_reverse_destroy() fixes the problem as well. Is
this a better solution for the fix?
It's the same but doesn't require a new function.
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit:
A couple of months ago it was agreed on how to get multiple inheritance
like behavior in a way which could work with PHP. I just haven't had time
to implement it yet.
The talk was about aggregation of instances of classes with auto-proxy.
So you'd do something like:
class foo extends bar
At 09:25 PM 6/5/2002 +0300, Jani Taskinen wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 11:35 PM 6/4/2002 +0300, Jani Taskinen wrote:
The source snapshots don't have the bison/flex generated
files anymore..why is that?
genfiles was broken but I fixed it in HEAD
Was one of the questions about AG(allocated_memory)? Are you sure it's not
initialized in zend_alloc.c? I see an initialization there.
Andi
At 11:45 AM 6/4/2002 +0200, Hans Rakers wrote:
Hello all,
No offence, but whatever happened to the technical level on this list?
Last two weeks i
At 11:35 PM 6/4/2002 +0300, Jani Taskinen wrote:
The source snapshots don't have the bison/flex generated
files anymore..why is that?
genfiles was broken but I fixed it in HEAD. Is this still not the case?
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe,
At 03:27 PM 6/3/2002 +0300, Jani Taskinen wrote:
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
the web but more for Enterprise transaction based applications such as
billing systems.
Twisting your words a bit: You don't think PHP should be used for such
tasks ??
No I definitely
Hey,
I don't think we need a whole new vision for PHP. PHP's vision has always
been to be the best web scripting language out there with a focus on ease
of use. I think for most of us this hasn't changed. Sure it's cute that
you can do other things with it but let's be realistic; the focus of
At 04:21 PM 6/2/2002 +0200, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Jani Taskinen wrote:
I'm not that familiar with Java..so it would be nice to hear
what Java offers that PHP doesn't?
Private members and methods, interfaces, Application Servers, Beans,
Enterprise Beans.
Are you aware how complex
At 03:36 AM 6/3/2002 +0300, Jani Taskinen wrote:
On Sun, 2 Jun 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 04:21 PM 6/2/2002 +0200, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Jani Taskinen wrote:
I'm not that familiar with Java..so it would be nice to hear
what Java offers that PHP doesn't?
Private members
Try now.
Andi
At 16:55 31/05/2002 +0200, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Andi Gutmans wrote:
andiFri May 31 10:32:19 2002 EDT
Modified files:
/ZendEngine2zend_objects.c
Log:
- Fix build
I still get
ZendTS.lib(zend_objects.obj): error LNK2001
At 13:12 31/05/2002 -0700, brad lafountain wrote:
Ok,
I think we are split in two about what to do here. Ill try and list the
different ideas that have been proposed.
1) don't include at all
pros:
No need to worry about auto install or filesize.
cons:
Forces people to install
At 08:46 30/05/2002 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 30 May 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
I think that XML is a core technology and giving plugplay access to our
users is important. Having bundled the MySQL library made it easier for
people to get started with MySQL. Does that mean I
At 19:03 30/05/2002 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 30 May 2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Except with MySQL we have a commitment from the MySQL developers
themselves to maintain it and keep it current.
Which they do very often, isn't it Zak ;) But there is a point, there is
much more
At 16:39 30/05/2002 -0400, Dan Kalowsky wrote:
On Thu, 30 May 2002, brad lafountain wrote:
I personally will take responsiblity for bundling and upgrading it.
Brad,
Nothing personal (so please don't take it that way), but in my opinion
this isn't a good enough assurance. Historically you
I don't see any reason to allow passing non-variables by reference.
It is semantically incorrect.
Andi
At 09:40 29/05/2002 +0200, Stig S. Bakken wrote:
If this patch doesn't break anything, and it doesn't give us any
difficulties with ZE2 or major design issues, I'm +1.
- Stig
On Tue,
/expressions to pass by reference.
-Jason
On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 10:26, Andi Gutmans wrote:
I don't see any reason to allow passing non-variables by reference.
It is semantically incorrect.
Andi
At 09:40 29/05/2002 +0200, Stig S. Bakken wrote:
If this patch doesn't break anything
I think that XML is a core technology and giving plugplay access to our
users is important. Having bundled the MySQL library made it easier for
people to get started with MySQL. Does that mean I think every library
should be bundled with PHP? No, I don't.
But if libxml2 is a moving target and
Hi,
I know a link has been posted to subversion in the past
(http://subversion.tigris.org/).
I just want to let you guys know I'm dying to kick out CVS :)
I'm keeping my eye on subversion and awaiting a stable release and a CVS -
subversion converter (being worked on apparently).
For those of
Hey guys,
I just want to air my opinion on what happened with msession and PECL.
Although I have not always liked Mark's attitude in the past when it came
to coding conventions I do think that the move of msession into PECL
without consulting him nor php-dev was extremely wrong.
I personally
At 10:20 25/05/2002 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I kind of went off in a huff yesterday with the whole PECL/pear issue with
msession, it's over and lets move on. I did, however, want to explain *why*
I think msession should be in the main code.
In *big* websites, you need multiple web servers
distribution.
Zeev
At 17:24 25/05/2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Hey guys,
I just want to air my opinion on what happened with msession and PECL.
Although I have not always liked Mark's attitude in the past when it came
to coding conventions I do think that the move of msession into PECL
without
201 - 300 of 939 matches
Mail list logo
