Cool, I will have to try that.
Thanks!!
-Jason
On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 09:11, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Hey,
Has anyone managed to get php to compile with lcc? It compiles much faster
and therefore is good for development.
Andi
--
Jason T. Greene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Development Mailing
Why not just convert to using a long? Is there really a need to have 2
numeric types in the ini system?
-Jason
On Mon, 2002-11-11 at 00:20, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Hi,
How about changing the INI_ENTRY macros in debug mode to check if we're
using UpdateInt/UpdateLong and if so check if
.
-Jason
On Mon, 2002-11-11 at 10:42, Jason T. Greene wrote:
Why not just convert to using a long? Is there really a need to have 2
numeric types in the ini system?
-Jason
On Mon, 2002-11-11 at 00:20, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Hi,
How about changing the INI_ENTRY macros in debug mode
:39 AM 10/29/2002 -0600, Jason T. Greene wrote:
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 09:51, David M. Lloyd wrote:
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 02:49 PM 10/23/2002 -0500, David M. Lloyd wrote:
The reality of twos-complement, bitwise arithmatic is that there are
three basic shift
on this list
which isn't
necessarily the average PHP user.
Andi
At 11:39 AM 10/29/2002 -0600, Jason T. Greene wrote:
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 09:51, David M. Lloyd wrote:
On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 02:49 PM 10/23/2002 -0500, David M. Lloyd wrote
... then let's not put in the nonsense operator, and just have
three shift operations: , , and .
I agree
- D
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
-Jason
--
Jason T. Greene [EMAIL PROTECTED
buy a book.
-Jason
--
Jason T. Greene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 17:10, Alan Rawkins wrote:
Hi there,
I'm wondering if there is a way to attach a php function to an html a href
tag. I basically want to have a button, that when clicked
October 2002 19:23, Jason T. Greene wrote:
If for some reason we HAVE to have a symmetrical bogus unsigned left
shift operator, and we completely disagree with my arguments on
overloading the HEREDOC operator, then we can implement , =,
. = as the unsigned shift operators
On Sat, 2002-09-21 at 00:21, Hans Zaunere wrote:
4.2.3 on FreeBSD 4.6.2 (--enable-cli,--enable-sockets,etc)
I've been taking a look at the socket_* functions in PHP, and
specifically using raw sockets. I've started out with ICMP, and I can
form the ICMP header (more or less) and
What I was saying in my earlier email much longer drawn out email was,
that the API changes have been really final since version 4.2.0. The
only reason I would change it, would be if someone demonstrated a
problem with the interface, which no one has for 4.2.0 - 4.2.3 versions.
The only API
Doesn't this currently work without your patch?
-Jason
On Thu, 2002-08-08 at 02:49, Alan Knowles wrote:
this efree needs removing..
+
+efree(*call_name);
+DEBUG_OUT(done call_user function\n);
+
-08-12 at 08:38, Alan Knowles wrote:
Jason T. Greene wrote:
Doesn't this currently work without your patch?
it does if we add O_ASYNC to the defines in dio
the pcntl patch just fixes class based callbacks.. *the memory leaks I
mentioned earlier where due to creating the signal connections
On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 08:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 31 Jul 2002, Jason T. Greene wrote:
Instead of mutexing the entire interpreter to death, why don't you try
creating multiple interpreters (each in a thread), and then come up with
a sharing mechanism.
Sounds like duplication
On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 04:43, Alan Knowles wrote:
It's not about looking at the perl code, that will tell you nothing
unless you know perl internals. It's about the way the interpreter
works, some of the architecture, that is simular to PHP. In PHP,
threads are isolated, kind of
To make threading useful, you would need to somehow arrange for multiple
threads to access the same underlying zval data without blocking all
the threads. This just isn't possible AFAIK.
Yes, this is definitely not possible without greatly modifying the
engine's zval management (which would
Instead of mutexing the entire interpreter to death, why don't you try
creating multiple interpreters (each in a thread), and then come up with
a sharing mechanism.
-Jason
On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 03:57, Alan Knowles wrote:
Im looking at adding threading to php, (for the cgi/cli stuff)..
The
Gina,
This list is for the development OF php not with php, please post
questions like these to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Jason
On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 14:17, Planet Internet Nieuws wrote:
I've tried everything I can think of including variations with \t in a
printf(), chr(9), etc. I am trying to
Everyone,
I am finally back from vacation, and I will be playing catch-up for a
while.(my email box has over 1000 msgs and I have missed about 1928
php-dev posts, I am sure the equiv CVS posts. )
Please give me some time to catch up.
Thanks,
-Jason
--
PHP Development Mailing List
IMO, one of the big reasons for having a powerful OO mode, and
continually evolving php to have a bigger target than just a web
programming language, is code re-usability. You can design a nice
consistent Framework, and easily rollout web, gui, and back end
applications all using the same
,
and it'll be even better in 5 - PEAR is a clear demonstration of
this. Whether people actually end up reusing code depends on the way they
code, very little does it depend on the language.
Zeev
At 05:27 PM 6/7/2002, Jason T. Greene wrote:
IMO, one of the big reasons for having a powerful OO
If '+' concatenates what does '-' do?
: )
-Jason
On Wed, 2002-06-05 at 09:39, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
The latest one changes some operators.
Nice, but why not overload + for strings to do the concatenation?
Doing that would be ambiguous, to say the least. PHP automatically
. Bakken wrote:
If this patch doesn't break anything, and it doesn't give us any
difficulties with ZE2 or major design issues, I'm +1.
- Stig
On Tue, 2002-05-28 at 21:12, Jason T. Greene wrote:
Due to this patch being sent during the msession discussion, it has not
been noticed, so I am
Yes and as I said in my argument, this solves some of the problems but
does not solve a non-rightmost parameter being optional.
-Jason
On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 11:43, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Hamster ate my mail? Resent, just in case.
Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
brad lafountain wrote:
Even if it is semantically incorrect( which I disagree.)
How is allowing a constant/expression to be passed by reference more
semantically incorrect than allowing a default (which is a constant)
on a pass by reference argument?
-Jason
On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 10:53, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 13:53, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Okay I'll try and look at your patch in the next couple of days.
It's quite sensitive code which this changes (has harmless as it might
seem) so I need some time to read over it.
Thanks, I did test this very thoroughly. However, due to its
Due to this patch being sent during the msession discussion, it has not
been noticed, so I am resending.
-Jason
---BeginMessage---
Problem
---
There are some scenarios where a function requires the ability to modify
parameters that may also be optional. Optional parameters work well,
On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 03:13, Zeev Suraski wrote:
Jason,
He has a point in the sense that it's trivially easy to starve a PHP based
web server from within, safe mode enabled or not. What you describe as the
automated way in which the web server will overcome this attack is not
realistic
On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 04:11, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 11:42 13/05/2002, veins wrote:
He has a point in the sense that it's trivially easy to starve a PHP based
web server from within, safe mode enabled or not. What you describe as
the
automated way in which the web server will overcome
I very much agree : )
-Jason
On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 03:42, veins wrote:
He has a point in the sense that it's trivially easy to starve a PHP based
web server from within, safe mode enabled or not. What you describe as
the
automated way in which the web server will overcome this attack is
On Mon, 2002-05-13 at 09:54, Ilia A. wrote:
Now you are really starting to stretch it. I am sure the ratio of
customers that have db backends are much smaller than general webhosting
customers
PHP is very commonly used with a database (MySQL). I'd venture to say that 70%
of people who
From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2001/09/10 Mon PM 01:58:03 CDT
To: Vlad Krupin [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Alexander Wirtz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: Jason Greene [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Andrei Zmievski [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Last, i don't see why the implementation as exists, requires 3
semaphores.
I just looked over the code, and the reason for this is it specifically designed for a
multi-process web environment. The most common method for semaphore initialization is
in the parent process right before
As far as creating the new module goes, it shouldn't be 'to much effort'. The basic
implimentation of system v semaphores
is actualy quite simple, its the usage of sempahores that can be very confusing :-)
sysv sem's are often refered to as the
most difficult to comprehend of the sysv
33 matches
Mail list logo
