On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Even in 4.2, I think we can optimize it. Assuming chdir() doesn't return
an error, we shouldn't need that second getpwd() call since we just did
the chdir() and we should know where we are.
Not necessarily... In a
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
That's true, but in threaded mode we don't do the chdir() at all. This is
specifically for non-threaded.
Gotcha... didn't realize you were referring to non-t'ed only.
--
===
Jim Jagielski
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
So, I am just starting out down the path to figure out why PHP 4.3 has
gotten so much slower than 4.2. strace -c provides the first clue. A
straight ./configure --enable-inline-optimization make command-line
build for 4.2, 4.3 and 5.0 run on a simple hello world script
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, Shane Caraveo wrote:
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
So, I am just starting out down the path to figure out why PHP 4.3 has
gotten so much slower than 4.2. strace -c provides the first clue. A
straight ./configure --enable-inline-optimization make command-line
build for
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, Shane Caraveo wrote:
CGI, right? Part of this may be from the path_info handling I've added.
The extra realpath() and fstat() calls are not cgi specific, so if what
you added only affects cgi, then that isn't the big problem.
-Rasmus
ok, it's only
Who is working on the sablotron xslt module? I would like to help out
with its development.
Thanks,
Ray Hunter
--
Ray Hunter
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www:http://venticon.com
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hey Sander, you fixed a problem back in July where you introduced a second
realpath() call into the main execute_script() function. I understand
what you were trying to achieve, but realpath() is way way too expensive
to toss around like that, especially since we already do the realpath on
the
This double seeking is most probably due to the fact that the stdio
layer does one set of seeking, whereas streams needs to do another.
This can be solved by moving away from using stdio for streams, and just
using the raw descriptors instead. (already made a start on this in
PHP 5).
I'm a
Have you been testing PHP_4_3 from CVS or the actual 4.3.0 release?
You might find the situation slightly better using the latest (I tidied
up some seek related issues the other day).
The straces are from PHP_4_3 HEAD as of this morning.
I thought originally that these issues were just a
Hi !!
Including or openeing a file fails when all paths defined in
include_path are not also defined in open_basedir, regardless
if the file to open/include is in both definitions.
Imagine include_path = .:/usr/local/lib/php:/usr/local/http-docs
open_basedir = .:/usr/local/http-docs
Hi !!
open_basedir warning in fopen_wrappers.c does not correctly report the
real open_basedir paths, it only reports the path it was actually
testing when the test failed. This patch will make it show the correct
information.
--
Best regards ...
I was arrested for selling illegal sized paper.
Hi !!
Correction to last submited patch !!
Including or openeing a file fails when all paths defined in
include_path are not also defined in open_basedir, regardless
if the file to open/include is in both definitions.
Imagine include_path = .:/usr/local/lib/php:/usr/local/http-docs
Hello,
The 1st patch will be applied, the 2nd is better but increase again the
difference between the official GD and the bundled GD.
Our plan is to keep our energy on the new gd and provides only bugfixes
in the current 4.3 releases, that makes our life really easier.
thank's for your
Hi Andi (and James)
Andi: I'd appreciate your comments on this patch, specifically if there
are any concerns about it doing the right thing.
Most people here:
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=21310edit=1
report that it fixes their problems with solaris.
I've held off from looking at this, as I
Oh good, it hasn't been forgotten. I just want to point
out that if committed the open() statement should probably
use O_RDONLY. [main.c @ ~1542] I used 0 because I didn't
have time to figure out where to add the correct #include
to get O_RDONLY into main.c.
-James
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, Wez
On 23 Feb 2003, Ray Hunter wrote:
RH Who is working on the sablotron xslt module? I would like to help out
RH with its development.
See the header in ext/xslt/sablot.c :)
Currently, there's not much going on though - PHP-4.x tree is in feature-freeze,
and XML support in PHP5 is under the
Hi, can i get only the errors of the script and not the html code who
returned the zend_eval_string function?
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
To get this thing started, I'm going to roll PHP 4.3.2-pre1
on Wednesday, 26th Feb, around 3pm EEST. And I'll announce
it on php-general too, to get some more people testing it
before we start with any RCs.
Following is collection of bugs marked as critical and verified
I wanted to run through all the cgi stuff in detail again for 432, but
likely wont have the time by the 26th to do that.
Shane
Jani Taskinen wrote:
To get this thing started, I'm going to roll PHP 4.3.2-pre1
on Wednesday, 26th Feb, around 3pm EEST. And I'll announce
it on php-general
It's just the date for pre1, no need to worry about that yet. :)
(RC1 will be later)
--Jani
On Sun, 23 Feb 2003, Shane Caraveo wrote:
I wanted to run through all the cgi stuff in detail again for 432, but
likely wont have the time by the 26th to do that.
Shane
Jani
Help translate documentation to portuguese (PORTUGAL) and mantain it (if you need).
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi, I have this code:
?php
error_reporting(E_ALL);
class esempio {
var $pubblica;
private $privata = Io sono privata;
var $protetta = Io sono protetta;
/*function esempio()
{
echo sono in esempio::esempio()br\n;
}
*/
function __construct()
{
Il sab, 2003-02-22 alle 14:57, michel 'ziobudda' morelli ha scritto:
Hi, I have this code:
Hi again.
In my script I have noticed that if I write:
protected $protetta = Io sono protetta;
the function
function ex2()
{
echo sono in ex2()br\n;
echo \$Protetta:
Hello, i need to get the name of the variables who passed in one
function, for example:
switch ((*struc)-type) {
case IS_BOOL:
fprintf(_dyn_log_file_fp, %sbool:%s\n, COMMON,
((*struc)-value.lval?true:false));
break;
With this i
You can't get the name of the variable. For what purpose do you need it?
Andi
At 03:45 PM 2/22/2003 +0100, Ivan Rodriguez wrote:
Hello, i need to get the name of the variables who passed in one
function, for example:
switch ((*struc)-type) {
case IS_BOOL:
I need to get the because i doing a simple debugger, and i get the type
of variable and his information , and i would like to get his name, any
possible way does not exist?
thx
El sb, 22-02-2003 a las 15:42, Andi Gutmans escribi:
You can't get the name of the variable. For what purpose do you
On 22 Feb 2003, Ivan Rodriguez wrote:
I need to get the because i doing a simple debugger, and i get the type
of variable and his information , and i would like to get his name, any
possible way does not exist?¿
It *is* possible, but it is not straight forward. plugBut why reinvent
the
I think xdebug might do it (http://xdebug.derickrethans.nl/) although I've
never used it.
Andi
At 03:56 PM 2/22/2003 +0100, Ivan Rodriguez wrote:
I need to get the because i doing a simple debugger, and i get the type
of variable and his information , and i would like to get his name, any
PHP 4 Bug Database summary - http://bugs.php.net
Num Status Summary (1058 total including feature requests)
===[*Configuration Issues]
19282 Wont fix Place php4ts.dll into \sapi
20490 Analyzed enable versioning not supported on OSX
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Derick Rethans wrote:
On 22 Feb 2003, Ivan Rodriguez wrote:
I need to get the because i doing a simple debugger, and i get the type
of variable and his information , and i would like to get his name, any
possible way does not exist?¿
It *is* possible, but it is
Thx for all, i was trying to do something :-)
El sb, 22-02-2003 a las 15:57, Derick Rethans escribi:
On 22 Feb 2003, Ivan Rodriguez wrote:
I need to get the because i doing a simple debugger, and i get the type
of variable and his information , and i would like to get his name, any
Ok,
I have written a module for php, (i mean, using zend api)
It is interesting to submit it? And whom do I have to ask ?
-Message d'origine-
De : Andrey Hristov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : samedi 22 février 2003 17:19
À : Sylvain Becker; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: [PHP-DEV]
At 18:20 22.02.2003, Marcus Boerger wrote:
helly Sat Feb 22 12:20:06 2003 EDT
Log:
Added dba handler inifiles to support ini files. (Marcus)
If someone wants to test this stuff:
The layout of the inifile is:
[ group ]
name ws* = ws* value ws*
The dba keyformat to use is: [ [ group ]
I don't really know to start. I've made a patch and want to ask for
the offical way to bring this patch into the php engine (if this is
possible). I also need some help about the internals of php.
At first I will explain some things, why I made the patch. Imagine
a big webserver with a few dozen
hi,
I don't really know to start. I've made a patch and want to ask for
the offical way to bring this patch into the php engine (if this is
possible). [..]
This has been done several times now. Once by me, once by someone else,
and once by you. The decision was: No. Rationale: PHP should not
hi,
- is it a good idea to 'fake' the '-f' parameter?
This can also be done with php_admin_value in the VirtualHost. No need to
patch PHP if you only want THIS behaviour.
-daniel
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
is there a possibility to implement bcpowmod() in a
version prior than PHP5?
bcpowmod() ist the only way to calculate a blind signature
as described by David CHAUM 1982 - digicash
(openssl does not work here).
now I use the shell_exec command and an external java applet.
(btw. java has a great
Hi,
Robert Kofler wrote:
is there a possibility to implement bcpowmod() in a
version prior than PHP5?
bcpowmod() ist the only way to calculate a blind signature
as described by David CHAUM 1982 - digicash
(openssl does not work here).
try this:
function bcPowMod($n, $e, $m) {
//if ($m == 0
Hi all,
I am trying to send html email from a php script, I know how to basically
use the mail() function, but it seems to be only able to send plain text
email.
If anyone can help me, please do
Thanks in advance
Adriaan Nel
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To
Hi all,
I would like to send html email from a php script, I know how to basically
use the mail() function, but it seems to be only able to send text
emailsdoes any1 know how I can solve this problemif so PLEASE let me
know about it.
Thanks in advance
Adriaan Nel
--
PHP Development
On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Adriaan Nel wrote:
AN I would like to send html email from a php script, I know how to basically
AN use the mail() function, but it seems to be only able to send text
AN emailsdoes any1 know how I can solve this problemif so PLEASE let me
AN know about it.
This is a
After fixing hopefully last problems in the inifile handler i made
up a patch which introduces a native interface to the inifile handler.
I did this because the [group]name key format is not intuitive.
The patch introduces following (self speaking) new functions:
int inifile_open(string path,
Overview:
domxml does not include a close document routing to release memory after
an xml document has been processed. I have added one.
Purpose:
I am using PHP's domxml functionality to parse thousands (17,000+) xml
documents in a single request. The current implementation of domxml in
PHP
At 03:49 23.02.2003, Jani Taskinen wrote:
I kinda missed the point of this thing..any real life examples..? :)
The [group]name format is only to be able to use dba for ini files.
The trick is a keyname cannot start with [, thats all.
However i just introduced the native interface, see:
Maintaining the documentation
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
I think this is not the right group you're posting too.
Post your question in the right newsgroup [PHP-WIN], ...
Anyway your question is more system-technical. This has nothing to do with PHP. You
have to configure your internetaccess server or your router or your internetshare-pc.
Check out
Look in the archives for that guys original patch; it allowed doing
something like this:
$foo = array();
$foo[] = some text;
$foo[] = more text;
file_put_contents(file.txt, $foo);
and also:
file_put_contents(file.txt, $foo, $bar, $baz);
I'm not 100%
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Jani Taskinen wrote:
I object! :) It should be one function with extra parameter
to decide the action..
Please put this code into ext/completely_unneeded.
- Sascha
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit:
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Sascha Schumann wrote:
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Jani Taskinen wrote:
I object! :) It should be one function with extra parameter
to decide the action..
Please put this code into ext/completely_unneeded.
ah, you mean ext/ircg...
Derick
--
I'm not 100% sure if we want this feature, but perhaps it is worth
revisiting that patch.
Alternatively, I would suggest to teach the submitter of that
patch regarding fopen, fwrite, implode. He might have
overlooked those existing functions.
- Sascha
--
PHP Development
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Sascha Schumann wrote:
I'm not 100% sure if we want this feature, but perhaps it is worth
revisiting that patch.
Alternatively, I would suggest to teach the submitter of that
patch regarding fopen, fwrite, implode. He might have
overlooked those existing
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Sascha Schumann wrote:
I'm not 100% sure if we want this feature, but perhaps it is worth
revisiting that patch.
Alternatively, I would suggest to teach the submitter of that
patch regarding fopen, fwrite,
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Sascha Schumann wrote:
I think a counterpart for file_get_contents in the form of a plain
file_put_contents would be welcome.
Don't tell me that
?php file_write_content('foobar.txt', 'foo!', file_exists('foobar.txt'));
I meant a *plain* file_put_contents:
I meant a *plain* file_put_contents:
That must be one of the most useless function proposals I've
seen so far.
Now, if the function could atomically replace file contents,
then it would be something entirely different.
But a simple wrapper for a two-line fopen/fputs? Get
Sascha Schumann wrote:
But a simple wrapper for a two-line fopen/fputs? Get real.
you forgot the fclose() ;)
--
Six Offene Systeme GmbH http://www.six.de/
i.A. Hartmut Holzgraefe Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel.: +49-711-99091-77
Sie finden uns auf der CeBIT in Halle 6/H44
That's like one of those functions I've written myself and have to include
in about every project I write...
I think it's a Good Thing.
Regards,
Dirkjan Ochtman
Sascha Schumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I meant a *plain*
n Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
That's like one of those functions I've written myself and have to include
in about every project I write...
I think it's a Good Thing.
Well, I fully understand that. I just disagree with the idea
that this utility function should become
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 03:04:27AM +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote :
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Sara Golemon wrote:
I recall a discussion sometime back about making file_put_contents() (create
a file and write the provided contents to it in one command) and
file_add_contents() (like put but append
On February 21, 2003 04:54 am, Wez Furlong wrote:
Look in the archives for that guys original patch; it allowed doing
something like this:
$foo = array();
$foo[] = some text;
$foo[] = more text;
file_put_contents(file.txt, $foo);
and also:
On February 21, 2003 05:00 am, Sascha Schumann wrote:
Alternatively, I would suggest to teach the submitter of that
patch regarding fopen, fwrite, implode. He might have
overlooked those existing functions.
That's what I like about PHP, you learn about new functions every single
implode) and fclose. However, IMO this wrapper is very useful since it
simplifies commonly used code a great deal and even makes it slightly faster
since the wrapper is in C rather then in PHP.
Oh, come on. Put it into a utility library; this does not
belong into the core of PHP. Or
The recent fixes to the COM extension (for the 4_3 branch) have helped
with a lot of the memory leaking that was occuring. Working with
the latest snapshot I've done some additional work to clean up the
few remaining leaks I am seeing in my COM calls. I believe that the
two patches below
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Sascha Schumann wrote:
implode) and fclose. However, IMO this wrapper is very useful since it
simplifies commonly used code a great deal and even makes it slightly faster
since the wrapper is in C rather then in PHP.
Oh, come on. Put it into a utility library;
I recently discovered two problems in ZE2 that break BC.
The following snippet works fine on ZE1, but gives Fatal error: Class
'foo' not found on ZE2. Classes apparently need to be defined before
they can be used.
$bar = new foo();
class foo {}
Although it's easy to work around this
Contribute with the documentation of PHP Manual, Translations and MacOS X Generations
of Help PHP Manual, in italian and Engliash
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On February 21, 2003 09:38 am, Sascha Schumann wrote:
implode) and fclose. However, IMO this wrapper is very useful since it
simplifies commonly used code a great deal and even makes it slightly
faster since the wrapper is in C rather then in PHP.
Oh, come on. Put it into a utility
Hello all,
Pardon my cluelessness, but I'm trying to teach the apache2* SAPI's
about PHP's xbithack setting per the following bug (which Jani has
pointed me at):
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=22321
I believe I have the logic for that bug corrected in my tree. (As an
aside, this particular
It'd be nice to see an example of the XML. I liked the simplicity of
today's prototype file, I'm not sure XML isn't an overkill.
Andi
At 11:24 AM 2/19/2003 +0100, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
i've just added the first working results of a replacement for the good
old ext_skel script in
MRS. EKI OMORODION
# 8 Queens Drive Ikoyi
Lagos.
Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
INTRODUCTION: l am Mrs. Eki Omorodion l know this
proposal will come to you as a surprise because we
have not met before
either physically or through correspondence. I have no
doubt in your
ability to handle this proposal
even developers lists aren't safe from snail-trail scammers! Grrr...
Louwtjie Taljaard
_
Services:
* IT Security Consulting
* Systems Management
* Systems Administration
* HP / IBM / Sun / SGI / Cisco Operations
* Software Web Presence Development
_
Looking for love in
Develop the PEAR's Net_IMAP package
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
good
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Marcus Börger wrote:
At 17:38 19.02.2003, Marc Boeren wrote:
Hi,
What is the official MFH policy? Are all bugfixes MFH-ed?
Normally, yes. Except when we're close to release (which we are not
right now).
How does this work? Add -r PHP_4_3 to the mfh-commit?
Cheerio, Marc.
If
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Corne' Cornelius wrote:
Pardon my ignorance, but what is MFH ?
Merge From Head
Derick
--
Stop mad cowboy disease!
-
Derick Rethans
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only one question: why not change the name of this mailing list ???
Only a idea.
it is already advertised as
Internals list
A medium volume list for those who want
to help out with the development of PHP
on http://www.php.net/mailing-lists.php,
so maybe changing
=
FAILED TEST SUMMARY
-
File type functions [ext/standard/tests/file/001.phpt]
Bug #21131: fopen($filename, a+) has broken position
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, David Brown wrote:
Hi Derick:
Sorry about leaving php-dev off of the Cc - your reply didn't make it
back to the php-dev list, though you did indeed respond. :)
A couple of followup questions:
1. The crashes I'm able to catch with ?php function a(){a();}a(); ?
Just make this one moderated. (but allow anyone with CVS
access to post freely :)
--Jani
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Hartmut Holzgraefe wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only one question: why not change the name of this mailing list ???
Only a idea.
it is already advertised
I have a question in regards to page timeouts and how the initial
request is terminated.
First, I apologize up front for my ignorance. I am not a php user,
rather a database developer who has customers using php.
I've noticed if a query takes longer than the default 30 seconds to
execute, php
I have a question in regards to page timeouts and how the initial
I've noticed if a query takes longer than the default 30 seconds to
execute, php returns a timeout message to the user. From what I can
tell, php uses the SIGPROF signal to stop execution when the 30
seconds
has expired.
On timeout, the engine will call zend_bailout(), which performs a
longjmp(). It does unwind the stack, but since we're dealing with C and
not C++ and there are no destructors, it's your responsibility to clean
after yourself. You can do it by properly registering your resources with
PHP's
- Original Message -
On timeout, the engine will call zend_bailout(), which performs a
longjmp(). It does unwind the stack, but since we're dealing with
C and
not C++ and there are no destructors, it's your responsibility to
clean
after yourself. You can do it by properly
At 17:05 20/02/2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
On timeout, the engine will call zend_bailout(), which performs a
longjmp(). It does unwind the stack, but since we're dealing with
C and
not C++ and there are no destructors, it's your responsibility to
clean
after
Don't call malloc? Wow, that puts some serious restrictions on what an external
library can do. :)
Couldn't drivers be required to implement something like SQLCancel in ODBC? A
mechanism that lets the driver processing the request cancel the query nicely?
-Original Message-
From: Zeev
At 17:20 20/02/2003, Jeremy Mullin wrote:
Don't call malloc? Wow, that puts some serious restrictions on what an
external library can do. :)
In the code that you control, obviously.
Couldn't drivers be required to implement something like SQLCancel in
ODBC? A mechanism that lets the driver
Translating the documentation into Latvian.
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
At 16:58 20/02/2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a question in regards to page timeouts and how the initial
I've noticed if a query takes longer than the default 30 seconds to
execute, php returns a timeout message to the user. From what I can
tell, php uses the SIGPROF signal to stop
- Original Message -
I looked into the bug report, and it is true that
BLOCK_INTERRUPTIONS
should indeed block SIGPROF. I'll fix this in the weekend.
I'm not sure if after unblocking interruptions PHP will get SIGPROF ...
it could cause long scripts. I'd rather use EG(timeout).
At 17:38 20/02/2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
I looked into the bug report, and it is true that
BLOCK_INTERRUPTIONS
should indeed block SIGPROF. I'll fix this in the weekend.
I'm not sure if after unblocking interruptions PHP will get SIGPROF ...
it could cause
You could charge $100 per php licence too. :P
Regards
Mike Robinson
Jani Taskinen wrote:
Just make this one moderated. (but allow anyone with CVS
access to post freely :)
--Jani
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 05:48:29PM +0200, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 17:38 20/02/2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
I looked into the bug report, and it is true that
BLOCK_INTERRUPTIONS
should indeed block SIGPROF. I'll fix this in the weekend.
I'm not sure if
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 05:11:55PM +0100, Wojtek Meler wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 05:48:29PM +0200, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 17:38 20/02/2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
I looked into the bug report, and it is true that
BLOCK_INTERRUPTIONS
should
Jani Taskinen wrote:
Just make this one moderated. (but allow anyone with CVS
access to post freely :)
That sounds like a very good idea.
--
Sebastian Bergmann
http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/
Did I help you? Consider a gift:
I recall a discussion sometime back about making file_put_contents() (create
a file and write the provided contents to it in one command) and
file_add_contents() (like put but append rather than overwrite) to
complement file_get_contents() but looking in HEAD I don't see either put or
add.
Was it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have reported at http://bugs.php.net/?id=22323 that it's impossible to
actually create png images that are partially transparent. I needed that
feature yesterday so I have created a patch (attached - mailer mangles
patches) for this.
This
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Jukka Holappa wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I have reported at http://bugs.php.net/?id=22323 that it's impossible to
actually create png images that are partially transparent. I needed that
feature yesterday so I have created a patch
Please accept my apology for the silly question.
Louwtjie Taljaard
_
Services:
* IT Security Consulting
* Systems Management
* Systems Administration
* HP / IBM / Sun / SGI / Cisco Operations
* Software Web Presence Development
_
Looking for love in all the wrong
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Sara Golemon wrote:
I recall a discussion sometime back about making file_put_contents() (create
a file and write the provided contents to it in one command) and
file_add_contents() (like put but append rather than overwrite) to
complement file_get_contents() but looking in
if we an administrator, and if we want to give limited acces to the other user,
axample: if we have 12 computer which connect to internet, but this computer
and we have users which can use this computer and if we want to give them
limited size to acces internet, example username amanda, we give
On February 20, 2003 02:51 pm, Sara Golemon wrote:
Was it decided not to create these?
Yes
Is it simply a matter of noone having gotten around to it?
Yes
Am I paying too much attention to the voices in my head?
Maybe ;)
Joking aside, I do have a patch to implement the mentioned
701 - 800 of 43526 matches
Mail list logo
