[Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
> At 08:13 AM 4/19/2001 -0400, Stig Sæther Bakken wrote:
> >
> >To be quite blunt, I don't have the time to implement this in C.
> >
> >I've tried to get people involved in the strategy for PEAR for months
> >and months. It's typical that nobody reacts until aft
> I still think that a large majority of people will want to grab the
> C-extensions and compile them statically into PHP, i.e. putting them in
> ext/, ./buildconf, ./configure ...
>
> Andi
I agree. There is also the possibility that some extensions will have problems as a .so
on some archetec
At 09:05 AM 4/19/2001 +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 07:21:32AM +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> > At 09:16 PM 4/18/2001 -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> > > > >When we're past the prototyping phase and stuff stabilizes, a C
> > > > >rewrite may be a good idea, but I don't thin
At 08:13 AM 4/19/2001 -0400, Stig Sæther Bakken wrote:
>[Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
> >
> > Right but if we chose XML this makes it much harder to have C clients
> > (even Perl because the module might not be installed). I don't think
>
>
>Over my dead body. Take a look at all
[Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
>
> Right but if we chose XML this makes it much harder to have C clients
> (even Perl because the module might not be installed). I don't think
Over my dead body. Take a look at all the magazines reviewing which
web development tools to use. Mos
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Well you know the most permanent things are temporary things such as
> prototypes.
> I also thought it would make much more sense to create something very small
> in C (maybe even Perl as it's installed on all systems) and use that.
PERL isn't installed
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 07:21:32AM +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> At 09:16 PM 4/18/2001 -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> > > >When we're past the prototyping phase and stuff stabilizes, a C
> > > >rewrite may be a good idea, but I don't think it is now.
> > >
> > > Well you know the most permanent thi
> >If we were to write it in C we would most likely need to provide a
> >statically linked binary anyway for the different platforms as not
> >everyone will have access to a fully functioning development environment.
>
> If they are compiling PHP and PHP extensions we can expect them to be able
>
At 09:24 PM 4/18/2001 -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> > At 09:16 PM 4/18/2001 -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> > > > >When we're past the prototyping phase and stuff stabilizes, a C
> > > > >rewrite may be a good idea, but I don't think it is now.
> > > >
> > > > Well you know the most permanent thin
> At 09:16 PM 4/18/2001 -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> > > >When we're past the prototyping phase and stuff stabilizes, a C
> > > >rewrite may be a good idea, but I don't think it is now.
> > >
> > > Well you know the most permanent things are temporary things such as
> > > prototypes.
> > > I als
At 09:16 PM 4/18/2001 -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> > >When we're past the prototyping phase and stuff stabilizes, a C
> > >rewrite may be a good idea, but I don't think it is now.
> >
> > Well you know the most permanent things are temporary things such as
> > prototypes.
> > I also thought it w
> >When we're past the prototyping phase and stuff stabilizes, a C
> >rewrite may be a good idea, but I don't think it is now.
>
> Well you know the most permanent things are temporary things such as
> prototypes.
> I also thought it would make much more sense to create something very small
> in C
At 10:03 PM 4/18/2001 -0400, Stig Sæther Bakken wrote:
>["Sean R. Bright" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
> > To continue a tangent... I don't like the idea of having the PEAR
> > fetching/installation mechanism written in PHP (already some base code in
> > PEAR to do this). It seems to me that it forces th
13 matches
Mail list logo
