On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Marcus Börger wrote:
> At 02:54 29.08.2002, Jani Taskinen wrote:
> >On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Marcus Börger wrote:
> >
> > >>Having exif not enabled by default doesn't harm development at all. If
> > >>people want exif, they can enable it just fine. Adding more 'bloat'
> > >>(this
Marcus Börger wrote:
> You all here are to determined on what you personally want and want to
> everybody do the same.
What's the difference to "I want to use EXIF, so enable it by default"?
--
Sebastian Bergmann
http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/
At 02:54 29.08.2002, Jani Taskinen wrote:
>On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Marcus Börger wrote:
>
> >>Having exif not enabled by default doesn't harm development at all. If
> >>people want exif, they can enable it just fine. Adding more 'bloat'
> >>(this has nothing to do with the usefulness) to the default
I'll throw my -1 on adding anything to be enabled by default. I've argued
this before, and I will continue to argue for less things to be enabled by
default.
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Jani Taskinen wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Marcus Börger wrote:
>
> >>Having exif not enabled by default doesn't ha
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Marcus Börger wrote:
>>Having exif not enabled by default doesn't harm development at all. If
>>people want exif, they can enable it just fine. Adding more 'bloat'
>>(this has nothing to do with the usefulness) to the default compilation
>>is not a good thing, for example we
At 22:27 28.08.2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Marcus Börger wrote:
>
> > I hope we could reach a consensus to leave the following modules in the
> > normal php distribution: old extensions, those maintaind by those
> developing
> > php's core and the extensions heavily integ
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Marcus Börger wrote:
> I hope we could reach a consensus to leave the following modules in the
> normal php distribution: old extensions, those maintaind by those developing
> php's core and the extensions heavily integrated into ph (like mbstring) and at
> least those extens
At 21:51 28.08.2002, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
>Marcus Börger wrote:
> > Ok, my pros were that it is well working, well maintained and does
> > not require any additional library. It offers the ability to handle
> > meta data stored in digital cameras. Accessing those meta data becomes
> > more an
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> Marcus Börger wrote:
> > Ok, my pros were that it is well working, well maintained and does
> > not require any additional library. It offers the ability to handle
> > meta data stored in digital cameras. Accessing those meta data becomes
> > more
Marcus Börger wrote:
> Ok, my pros were that it is well working, well maintained and does
> not require any additional library. It offers the ability to handle
> meta data stored in digital cameras. Accessing those meta data becomes
> more and more popular.
My, and I guess Derick's as well, ar
10 matches
Mail list logo
