On 10/04/02, "Stig S. Bakken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know, I am an old Atari TT owner. :-)
I have had linux/m68k running on amigas and a Sun 3/60 :-)
> > Personally, I would treat linux/m68k just like i386-linux, in terms of
> > which tests/checks you perform, except that it's m68k-linu
Stig:
> "powerpc-macos-x" Is there a need to distinguish between different
> MacOS X revisions?
On the system level, we need to talk about Darwin. And the
version information is crucial, as the platform is evolving
rapidly.
So, for example:
powerpc-darwin-5.3
i386-dar
On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 00:22, Stig S. Bakken wrote:
> The general format could be "CPU-OS[-EXTRA]"
I like "OS-CPU[-EXTRA]" more. A shell script (as one of your examples)
would often be CPU and EXTRA - but not OS - independend. If we use
"OS-CPU[-EXTRA]" it runs on eg. linux-*, and not *-linux*. It
On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 02:52, Wez Furlong wrote:
> On 10/04/02, "Stig S. Bakken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "m68k-linux-amiga" it never dies, does it?
>
> :-)
>
> > The trickiest part here seems to be detecting libc version on Linux. Or
> > is it enough to try reading symlinks in /lib?
On 10/04/02, "Stig S. Bakken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "m68k-linux-amiga" it never dies, does it?
:-)
> The trickiest part here seems to be detecting libc version on Linux. Or
> is it enough to try reading symlinks in /lib?
You might find that you need to do some glibc checks on m68k
