And I wonder why do you think it is so important to show the characters
like eacute; or auml; in every browser... ? For me, to show correct
multibyte characters in the gpc section would make more sense.
Therefore I think the best solution is to keep the best visibility in the
user's
resending...
Moriyoshi Koizumi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've made a revised patch. I don't see there's no more BC problem around
it. Please review it.
PS: I finally ended my search without a hit on such a discussion: Could
you give me a pointer where that discussion took place if it
OK, then.
--
Maxim Maletsky
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote... :
Thies, Maxim, if you could hang on for a few hours I'll be back with a few ideas and
a cleaned up version of the patches + a switch for oracle 9+ to enable the new nls
functions.
Abdul
--
PHP Development
Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 11:10 17/10/2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
Zeev Suraski wrote:
No, we shouldn't have. It is not a deprecated feature or a
discouraged feature. If you use the *FAIRLY RARE* combination of
using PHP to generate XML, you'd have to configure your PHP. If
you're with the
Hello Tom,
reede, 18.10.2002, you wrote:
TS Andrew Sitnikov wrote:
Any comments please ?
P.S. I know that 'REMOTE_ADDR' exists in $_SERVER[]
TS Are you using the lastest snapshot, I believe this is a bug that is now
TS fixed...
i use 4.2.3 and will try snapshot for you.
Best regards,
Hello,
If you explicitly specify a charset, then you need to encode the
characters according to that character set. The problem is, that
encodings such as eacute; and Auml; (which show up on the credits
page), don't work under all charsets/encodings.
IMO this is alreadly accomplished with
HEAD doesnt do parse_url(file:/tmp/bla) any more. (you need
to have 2 slahes after file: to make it work).
i really think we should allow the single-slash syntax again!
re,
tc
--
Thies C. Arntzen - Looking for all sorts of freelance work - just ask..
I have to admit that after grep'ing a few hundred xml documents it does
seem to make some sense to support this.
It's ugly but it works. The only question is what will we think of this in
two years time? :)
By the way, I really think we should quit the ? removing thread. I think
it's quite
Hello,
I could reproduce this with pre1, but latest CVS works fine again. Can
you try?
Derick
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Mike Robinson wrote:
?php
printf(%01.2f,-2999/100);
echo br;
printf(%01.2f,-3000/100);
echo br;
printf(%01.2f,-3000/100);
echo br;
I've made a revised patch. I don't see there's no more BC problem around
it. Please review it.
PS: I finally ended my search without a hit on such a discussion: Could
you give me a pointer where that discussion took place if it doesn't take
your time? I've ever looked over the archives of
I've been playing with php/embed and stumbled on a slight problem with php-config - it
doesn't include the paths for the libs:
% php-config --libs
-lrecode -lexpat -lsnmp -lpanel -lncurses -lmysqlclient -lming -lm
-lintl -lgd -lfreetype -lpng -lz -ljpeg -lexslt -lxsltbreakpoint
-lxml2 -lxslt -lz
Brad LaFountain [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
PHP_FUNCTION(ref_assign)
{
zval *bar, *foo;
if (zend_parse_parameters(ZEND_NUM_ARGS() TSRMLS_CC, zz, bar, foo) ==
FAILURE) {
return;
}
ZVAL_ADDREF(foo);
*bar = *foo;
bar-is_ref = TRUE;
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Wez Furlong wrote:
I've been playing with php/embed and stumbled on a slight problem with
php-config - it doesn't include the paths for the libs:
% php-config --libs
-lrecode -lexpat -lsnmp -lpanel -lncurses -lmysqlclient -lming -lm
-lintl -lgd -lfreetype -lpng -lz -ljpeg
Yup, I just grabbed a checkout and its fixed.
That was a weird one.
Regards
Mike Robinson
Derick Rethans wrote:
Hello,
I could reproduce this with pre1, but latest CVS works fine
again. Can
you try?
Derick
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Mike Robinson wrote:
?php
Maybe this is what you need?
http://www.naken.cc/mikehup.php
I use this on a CMS site, where the users upload imagefiles with ftp. After
that, they use a php webinterface to start an importscript (written in
Perl). By doing this command in php:
system(/usr/local/bin/mikehup /usr/bin/perl
Hello All,
AG I don't see why it's such a big deal for people who are creating xml to
AG turn-off short tags?
YES!
This is the main question/answer of this thread!
So, please, people, calm down.
Zmievski has got the present for all of you...=))
Antony Dovgal aka tony2001
OK, so /usr/lib/mysql was already in ld.so.conf.
The only way I got this to build was:
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/mysql make
wtf is going wrong here?
Could it be a libtool problem?
--Wez.
On 18/10/02, Wez Furlong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I try and link I get:
/usr/i486-suse-linux/bin/ld:
My main worry with such a hack would be breaking a script like this:
?php
function xml() {
echo Hello World;
}
?
...
?xml ()?
...
Now, people generally don't put spaces between the function name and the
(), but it is a BC concern since the above script works just fine
Derick Rethans wrote:
I could reproduce this with pre1, but latest CVS works fine again. Can
you try?
You gotta love bugkilling :)
--
* Tom Sommer
* http://www.tsn.dk | webmaster(a)tsn.dk
* Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature
--
PHP Development Mailing List
?php
printf(%01.2f,-2999/100);
echo br;
printf(%01.2f,-3000/100);
echo br;
printf(%01.2f,-3000/100);
echo br;
printf(%01.2f,-3000/100);
echo br;
printf(%01.2f,-3001/100);
echo br;
printf(%01.2f,-3000/100);
?
4.2.3 output:
-29.99
-30.00
-30.00
-30.00
-30.01
-30.00
4.3.0pre1
Stanislav Malyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
OK, looking again on the matter in depth, it seems to me that you cannot
do it from C function either, due to the way in which parameters are
passed in the engine.
Could you go into a little more depth on the problem, just so I
understand?
phpinfo() no longer encodes accented characters to eacute; or auml;.
I changed this on Wed Oct 9 10:39:39 2002 in version 1.215 of info.c.
I'm Sorry for taking your time. I missed the recent change about phpinfo.
And I reconfirmed that the entity conversion doesn't affect multibyte
Since there are no drawbacks at all to the ?xml detection, and since it
does cover a great deal of the problem (taking into account the very
limited scope of the problem), I don't see a good reason not to add
it. Rasmus put it very well in one of his recent letters - PHP is not a
purists'
+1
It's time to do so.
--
Yasuo Ohgaki
Andrei Zmievski wrote:
I propose we remove apidoc.txt from the tree. It is prety outdated and
only promotes confusion. We have a module for API documentation and it
is available online as well.
-Andrei
Andi Gutmans wrote:
I don't think we should add special hacks to the scanner. Soon we're
going to have a zillion hacks for other XML/SGML/foobar documents.
I agree.
We are better to leave it as documentation issue, IMO.
--
Yasuo Ohgaki
Andi
At 12:17 PM 10/16/2002 -0400, Ilia A. wrote:
I'm trying to do some extension programming, and I'm pretty confused
by the whole zval thing. In particular, references are a little
mysterious. If I have
$foo = zonk;
$bar = $foo;
in PHP, what actually happens? Specifically, if I wanted a function
that did such a reference
At 07:40 18/10/2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 01:09 AM 10/18/2002 +0200, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 18:49 17/10/2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
?xml ()? has whitespace.
And I personally think it's a bit pushing it. How likely is it for
someone to have a function called xml(), and then call it without
Unless they like arguing with themselvse in public heh
They are _not_ the same person!
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
Well, I differ with you on that. I don't think there's anything in
the same class as ?xml.
At 18:08 17/10/2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
I don't think we should add
just making it in numbers:
(users using short_tags) (users_using xml() function)
I suppose the first one wins. Now, wouldn't it be possible to find a
work around this issue? This should be a question, IMHO.
--
Maxim Maletsky
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002 08:14:21 +0900 Yasuo Ohgaki
ignore this mail
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Cool that's exactly what I wanted to know :)
Thanks Melvyn :)
_alex
Hi,
At 03:05 17-10-2002, Alex Black wrote:
[...]
Still no one has told me what's happening with the XML extension! :) That's
all I wanted to know...
Are you looking for Xerces support or for a validating XML
At 01:09 AM 10/18/2002 +0200, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 18:49 17/10/2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
?xml ()? has whitespace.
And I personally think it's a bit pushing it. How likely is it for
someone to have a function called xml(), and then call it without a space
from the ? tag, and then add a
Why did you remove the charset info?
I want my charset back since it enables correct handling of the output.
Everything these lines commented out by you do is telling the receiver
what charset he gets. That is compareable to http charset info which
will be generated by those modules also.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote... :
the OCIQuery that maxim proposed has the advantage of being pretty
high-level, making it much easier for mysql programmers to get a grip at
oracle, but then again i think that every self-respecting php developer
would write a function/method that does this for him
TDJ I'm trying to do some extension programming, and I'm pretty confused
TDJ by the whole zval thing. In particular, references are a little
TDJ mysterious. If I have
TDJ
TDJ $foo = zonk;
TDJ $bar = $foo;
TDJ
TDJ in PHP, what actually happens? Specifically, if I wanted a
This is definitely one thing to think about. This is exactly the reason why
I was against in the beginning. I had a feeling such ambiguities could arise.
Andi
At 09:43 AM 10/17/2002 -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
My main worry with such a hack would be breaking a script like this:
?php
At 18:49 17/10/2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
?xml ()? has whitespace.
And I personally think it's a bit pushing it. How likely is it for someone
to have a function called xml(), and then call it without a space from the
? tag, and then add a space before the parentheses? I think we can safely
At 10:14 AM 10/18/2002 +0200, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 07:40 18/10/2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 01:09 AM 10/18/2002 +0200, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 18:49 17/10/2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
?xml ()? has whitespace.
And I personally think it's a bit pushing it. How likely is it for
someone to
Stanislav Malyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
*snip*
TDJ that did such a reference assignment:
TDJ
TDJ $foo = zonk;
TDJ $bar = baz;
TDJ
TDJ ref_assign($bar, $foo); // $bar = $foo;
TDJ
TDJ what has to happen in ref_assign?
That's problematic, due to the way
PHP_FUNCTION(ref_assign)
{
zval *bar, *foo;
if (zend_parse_parameters(ZEND_NUM_ARGS() TSRMLS_CC, zz, bar, foo) ==
FAILURE) {
return;
}
ZVAL_ADDREF(foo);
*bar = *foo;
bar-is_ref = TRUE;
bar-refcount = 1;
}
this works, but i
Andrei Zmievski wrote:
Hi,
We have 10 critical bugs in the list currently. If you could please see
about fixing at least one of them, we'd be that much closer to a release
candidate.
Summary: Apache2 sending 304 - not modified header
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=17098
This is serious
- Original Message -
From: Stanislav Malyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tim Daly, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 5:34 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] trying to understand zvals
TDJ I'm trying to do some extension programming, and I'm pretty confused
Stanislav Malyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ah. Then you need to accept the first parameter by reference (this is
defined in ZEND_FE definition, put first_arg_force_ref as second
parameter). Then you get parameters the usual way (zend_get_parameters_ex,
etc.) and have to zval **
They are _not_ the same person!
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
Well, I differ with you on that. I don't think there's anything in the
same class as ?xml.
Zeev
At 18:08 17/10/2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
I don't think we should add special hacks to the scanner. Soon we're going
Ok, I've attached a pretty ok version. I had to update the config.m4 to inculde a
HAVE_OCI9 define, but since I'm not really good in this kind of thing, buildconf now
reports a warning
autoheader: No template for symbol `HAVE_OCI9'
don't know what to do about it. otherwise everything compiles
I propose we remove apidoc.txt from the tree. It is prety outdated and
only promotes confusion. We have a module for API documentation and it
is available online as well.
-Andrei http://www.gravitonic.com/
Computers are useless. They can only give you
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 09:43:02AM -0700, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
My main worry with such a hack would be breaking a script like this:
?php
function xml() {
echo Hello World;
}
?
...
?xml ()?
...
The hadler I suggest will no break any old code. Even
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 01:36:26PM +0200, Maxim Maletsky wrote:
Thies C. Arntzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote... :
Hope to see someone to anser, commenting my thoughts on this. I am very
much willing contributing to the PHP's Oracle support development.
that always appreciated.
Could someone explain to me why install-headers, programs,
build are treated as if they cannot be separately installed
from the pear scripts?
if test $PHP_PEAR != no test $disable_cli != 1; then
install_pear=install-pear install-build install-headers install-programs
TDJ Thanks for your response! While it does not cause a crash, your
TDJ function doesn't do what I expected. Do you know where I went
TDJ wrong?
You are right, this doesn't work. I'll look a bit more into it...
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Products Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On October 17, 2002 07:06 pm, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
Andrei Zmievski wrote:
Hi,
We have 10 critical bugs in the list currently. If you could please see
about fixing at least one of them, we'd be that much closer to a release
candidate.
Summary: Apache2 sending 304 - not modified header
They are _not_ the same person!
I'm not convinced. Have you never seen Fight Club?
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Zeev Suraski wrote:
Well, I differ with you on that. I don't think there's anything in
the
same class as ?xml.
Zeev
At 18:08 17/10/2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
I don't think we
TDJ Thanks for your response! While it does not cause a crash, your
TDJ function doesn't do what I expected. Do you know where I went
TDJ wrong?
OK, looking again on the matter in depth, it seems to me that you cannot
do it from C function either, due to the way in which parameters are
passed
Wez Furlong wrote:
Err, I suggest you read that patch again.
The default will be the mbstring.internal_charset
That's not the same thing!
Since the guess code is in #if, PHP is changing
behavior without the patch according to the
compiled environment.
How about add current guess code if
Ilia A. wrote:
Summary: Apache2 sending 304 - not modified header
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=17098
This is serious problem for serious sites.
(Serious sites shouldn't use Apache2, though)
This looks like an Apache 2 bug, rather then aPHP one. I am guessing the fix
they made did not work
Hello php-dev,
?
echo getenv('REMOTE_ADDR'): .getenv('REMOTE_ADDR').\n;
echo \$_ENV['REMOTE_ADDR']: .$_ENV['REMOTE_ADDR'].\n;;
echo getenv('PATH'): .getenv('PATH').\n;
echo \$_ENV['PATH']: .$_ENV['PATH'].\n;;
?
Output:
getenv('REMOTE_ADDR'): 212.7.15.36
TDJ Sorry, I wasn't clear. I mean ref_assign to be a C function, in my
TDJ extension.
Ah. Then you need to accept the first parameter by reference (this is
defined in ZEND_FE definition, put first_arg_force_ref as second
parameter). Then you get parameters the usual way
was obtained using CVS 20021018 (today's one). The
system used is Red Hat Linux 6.2.
Regards
Ryo
--
R Takagi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
At 10:32 18/10/2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Why for a couple of years? Oh because we might end up finding out it
wasn't such a good idea after all? :)
No, because in a couple of years maybe ?xml will be yesterday's news, and
?fooml will be the New Thang :)
Well anyway, as far as I'm concerned,
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 11:50:12AM +0200, Zeev Suraski wrote:
I can only argue with myself so much, eh? :)
yeah, just keep pretending dude... :)
Jan
--
Q: Thank Jan? A: http://geschenke.an.dasmoped.net/
Got an old and spare laptop? Please send me a mail.
Key7BCC EB86
Thies C. Arntzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote... :
i don't really think it's a needed function as it won't
support binding of variables and setting the execute mode.
True, you cannot use it for binding variables. Only these who often do
plain queries would find it useful.
also,
At 05:45 AM 10/16/2002 +0300, Jani Taskinen wrote:
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
Another option.
How about remove $_FILES contents from $_REQUEST?
It seems it has less impact.
+1 for this option. There's really no need it for to
be in $_REQUEST..
+1 from me too. I think
I don't think we should add special hacks to the scanner. Soon we're going
to have a zillion hacks for other XML/SGML/foobar documents.
Andi
At 12:17 PM 10/16/2002 -0400, Ilia A. wrote:
Since the general consensus by the developers is not to remove the short_tags
or even disable them. Perhaps
Thies C. Arntzen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote... :
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 10:26:46AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, and just to be clear about it: I am absolutely positive on
a completely new (perhaps unified) extension for PHP 5, and
would gladly participate.
hmm, sure - why
Well, I differ with you on that. I don't think there's anything in the
same class as ?xml.
Zeev
At 18:08 17/10/2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
I don't think we should add special hacks to the scanner. Soon we're going
to have a zillion hacks for other XML/SGML/foobar documents.
Andi
At 12:17 PM
How can i identify what server is using an Ip...
eg, 64.88.33.24 --- apache..
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
I. Am. So. Tired. Of. Seeing. This. Come. Up. Over. And. Over. Again.
The next time someone mentions this on the list, I'm grabbing a LART[1] and
heading over to their house.
So we're not going to
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, ^|CoOL|^ cRþSH wrote:
How can i identify what server is using an Ip...
eg, 64.88.33.24 --- apache..
lynx -dump -head http://$1/ | grep Server | cut -d ':' -f 2 | sed 's/^[ ]//'
But this is the _wrong_ list for asking these questsions, see
php.net/support.php.
Derick
url:
file:/bla/test
4.2.x output:
array(2) {
[scheme]=
string(4) file
[path]=
string(9) /bla/test
}
HEAD:
array(3) {
[scheme]=
string(4) file
[host]=
string(3) bla
[path]=
string(5) /test
}
re,
tc
--
Thies C. Arntzen - Looking for all sorts of
Thies, Maxim, if you could hang on for a few hours I'll be back with a few ideas and a
cleaned up version of the patches + a switch for oracle 9+ to enable the new nls
functions.
Abdul
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Err, I suggest you read that patch again.
The default will be the mbstring.internal_charset
That's not the same thing!
--Wez.
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
Wez Furlong wrote:
Search for htmlentities charset. Both myself and thies (and probably others
were discussing this).
:10:00 GMT
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
--- End Telnet ---
The test result was obtained using CVS 20021018 (today's one). The
system used is Red Hat Linux 6.2.
Regards
Ryo
--
R Takagi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe
What actual patch did you add to ap2filter?
-- james
The one with the look that you did not like... :-)
This patch was created based on 4.2.3 code but could successfully be
applied to the current CVS one as well.
--- sapi/apache2filter/sapi_apache2.c~ Fri Aug 16 07:27:03 2002
+++
At 16:24 17.10.2002, Colin Viebrock wrote:
Why did you remove the charset info?
I want my charset back since it enables correct handling of the output.
Everything these lines commented out by you do is telling the receiver
what charset he gets. That is compareable to http charset info which
hello,
this patch tries to fix the performance issues described in bug #19771.
i cannot benchmark this at the moment, so if anyone can, please do.
the patch is available at http://tal.madcode.org/file.c.patch
and thanks to wez :)
Tal
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To
Tal Peer wrote:
hello,
this patch tries to fix the performance issues described in bug #19771.
i cannot benchmark this at the moment, so if anyone can, please do.
the patch is available at http://tal.madcode.org/file.c.patch
and thanks to wez :)
Getting better, but it still too slow somehow...
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
Tal Peer wrote:
hello,
this patch tries to fix the performance issues described in bug #19771.
i cannot benchmark this at the moment, so if anyone can, please do.
the patch is available at http://tal.madcode.org/file.c.patch
and thanks to wez
Yasuo Ohgaki wrote:
Tal Peer wrote:
hello,
this patch tries to fix the performance issues described in bug #19771.
i cannot benchmark this at the moment, so if anyone can, please do.
the patch is available at http://tal.madcode.org/file.c.patch
and thanks to wez :)
Getting better, but it
Tal Peer wrote:
hello,
this patch tries to fix the performance issues described in bug #19771.
i cannot benchmark this at the moment, so if anyone can, please do.
the patch is available at http://tal.madcode.org/file.c.patch
and thanks to wez :)
It's not related to file(), but I found another
Andi Gutmans wrote:
I don't see why it's such a big deal for people who are creating xml to
turn-off short tags?
Me neither, I use short tags all the time, but thats just me :)
--
* Tom Sommer
* http://www.tsn.dk | webmaster(a)tsn.dk
* Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 01:09 AM 10/18/2002 +0200, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 18:49 17/10/2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
?xml ()? has whitespace.
And I personally think it's a bit pushing it. How likely is it for
someone to have a function called xml(), and then call it
At 18:08 18-10-2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 01:09 AM 10/18/2002 +0200, Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 18:49 17/10/2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
?xml ()? has whitespace.
And I personally think it's a bit pushing it. How likely is it for
someone to have a
Hi,
I am trying to understand better about building Win32 copy correctly
with Visual Studio 6 Enterprise. The only documentation I found so far
was
http://www.php.net/manual/en/install.windows.php#install.windows.manual
which, besides not really being what I need, looks also a bit outdated
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 10:17:21PM +0200, Maxim Maletsky wrote :
1. What dsp should I start compiling from for testing?
php4ts.dsw
2. What VC settings do I need to make?
Select the target you like to compile, apache sapi or
php4ts_cli for example.
3. Is there any
Thanks, Markus, that was helpful.
Would you like to also explain me more about the 'testsuite' dsw? i
couldn't figure it out because all i could see about it is the compile
logs over the archives :)
--
Maxim Maletsky
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002 23:20:45 +0200 Markus Fischer [EMAIL
I'm trying to optimize some code for an *extremely* busy site. This site
has a bunch of data in shared memory to make it available across all the
httpd's. I need to provide this data in the form of arrays to user-space
PHP through an extension obviously. Rather trivial to do, but my problem
is
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
I'm trying to optimize some code for an *extremely* busy site. This site
has a bunch of data in shared memory to make it available across all the
httpd's. I need to provide this data in the form of arrays to user-space
PHP through an extension
Also fixed.
Ilia
On October 18, 2002 06:37 am, Thies C. Arntzen wrote:
url:
file:/bla/test
4.2.x output:
array(2) {
[scheme]=
string(4) file
[path]=
string(9) /bla/test
}
HEAD:
array(3) {
[scheme]=
string(4) file
[host]=
string(3) bla
[path]=
I would like to help i18n related development
including mbstring, manual maintenance (English
and Japanese) and maintain some PECL module like
namazu.
Access requested: php4, pear, phpdoc and phpdoc-ja
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit:
Sorry, I found the CVS snapshot extracted on 20021016, but I now found
the problem not fixed. Either my test environment is not good, or my
ability to check all through it is insufficient...
Anyway,
I don't particularly like the look of this patch... we should fix 304's
properly...
However,
90 matches
Mail list logo
