Since I'm not entirely comfortable with the lexer (or the Zend Engine)
yet, I need to get a few questions answered:
1) I notice that there seems to be a T_LINE token, which should be the
linenumber? However, this never seems
To even come up in the lexer from the zend_highlight() function...
2)
At 09:14 AM 11/13/2002 -0500, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
FWIW:
* If this is ever going to make core as a part of PHP's i18n efforts, you
are going to have to deal with the 'unseen' at some point. You are not
going to identify them, by testing it
At 02:21 PM 11/13/2002 -0500, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
I made a branch for 4.3 and tagged it PHP_4_3. Please remember to sync
your fixes into the branch, if they are important and relevant, of
course.
BC still needs to be fixed in order to be thread-safe. The problem is that
_one_, _two_, _zero_
At 12:15 AM 11/14/2002 +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote:
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Peter Neuman wrote:
Hello,
Andrei Zmievski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
andrei Wed Nov 13 14:19:07 2002 EDT
Modified files:
/php4 configure.in
/php4/main php_version.h
Log:
Change version to 4.4.0-dev.
hm? not
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 12:15 AM 11/14/2002 +0200, Jani Taskinen wrote:
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Peter Neuman wrote:
Hello,
Andrei Zmievski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
andrei Wed Nov 13 14:19:07 2002 EDT
Modified files:
/php4 configure.in
/php4/main
Derick Rethans wrote:
It's just a number... but I also think we should head for 5.0.0-dev
now.
I would love to see that happen. But in this special case it's not
just a number. Maybe we should create a new CVS module, php5, to which
we copy php4/* and let cvs co php5 automatically
I would love to see that happen. But in this special case it's
not
just a number. Maybe we should create a new CVS module, php5, to
which
we copy php4/* and let cvs co php5 automatically checkout TSRM
and
ZendEngine2 (as Zend, of course).
You can do that without copying the
|I thought we're going with 5.0.0 after 4.3.0? Obviously we'd
|maintain the
|4.3.0 branch and continue to release bug fix releases. Or do
|you think we
|should wait for 4.3.1? I'm a bit concerned about 5.0 lingering for too
|long. You can see how 4.3 has lingered.
I was under the impression
|What is left to do to get 4.3.0 out the door? Anyone have any
|sort of list or idea Of where things need to be polished/cleaned up?
I meant of course beyond the little TODO already posted :)
John
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit:
Well actually you could. From the beginning of time up to 4.3.0. I
expect to see a lot of bug reports similar to this one.
Edin
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 10:10 AM
Subject: #20441 [Opn-Bgs]: PHP_AUTH_USER isn't set
That's not true. At least the From the beginning of time part. This
used to be a restriction, then it was lost, now it is back. You can go
scour cvs for the exact versions affected.
I am personally not entirely happy about this change either. It is
definitely a security issue for shared
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Marcus Börger wrote:
Locking does not work in db but now dba is a full superset. So
i won't use db. That's why i am for moving db to pecl maybe we
could print an endnote to configure saying db is deprecated?
I'm +1 on that, lets's see what the list things.
Derick
At
Here's a babel translation:
The problem is the following one: ImageCopyResampled ignores the coordinates
of the image origin. Although it is specified to them, this function ALWAYS
takes them like 0,0... I am sure that he is bug, because ImageCopyResized
works to me well but with such parametros.
The following patch for bug #19566 is open but should make it into 4.3.
cvs -z3 -q diff zend_hash.c (in directory S:\php4-HEAD\Zend\)
Index: zend_hash.c
===
RCS file: /repository/ZendEngine2/zend_hash.c,v
retrieving revision 1.93
Thanks, it works.
Attacthed is a slightly modified version of Ilia's patch in consideration
of win32 build.
If there are no objections, I'll commit it.
Moriyoshi
Ilia A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you try the attached patch and see if it fixes the problem.
Ilia
On November 14, 2002
Hmm, your patch is a bit less sexy because of replaced white spaces.
Moriyoshi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marcus Börger) wrote:
The following patch for bug #19566 is open but should make it into 4.3.
cvs -z3 -q diff zend_hash.c (in directory S:\php4-HEAD\Zend\)
Index: zend_hash.c
Here is a patch that hopefully would merge all the dlsym stuff from ZE1.
After this patch i no longer get a warning while configuring ZE2.
marcus
cvs -z3 -q diff Zend\configure.in Zend\Zend.m4 (in directory S:\php4-HEAD\)
Index: Zend/configure.in
http://www.alkoholbedarf.de/kram/test_report_tru64.zip
Regards,
Sebastian Nohn
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.nohn.net/
PGP Key Available - Did I help you? Consider a gift:
http://www.amazon.de/exec/obidos/wishlist/3HYH6NR8ZI0WI/
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To
Wasn't this commited a while ago?
Andi
At 11:58 AM 11/15/2002 +0100, Marcus Börger wrote:
The following patch for bug #19566 is open but should make it into 4.3.
cvs -z3 -q diff zend_hash.c (in directory S:\php4-HEAD\Zend\)
Index: zend_hash.c
Hi there,
I'm trying to write a C++ Wrapper, so it's possible for me to execute
PHP code from my own C++ programms. I used the CLI-SAPI
(php4/sapi/cli/...) as a template for my C++ Wrapper.
This works fine if the calling application is a single process but I run
into trouble if I call PHP
Can you please send the diff as an attachment? I'll apply it.
Thanks,
Andi
At 01:13 PM 11/15/2002 +0100, Marcus Börger wrote:
Here is a patch that hopefully would merge all the dlsym stuff from ZE1.
After this patch i no longer get a warning while configuring ZE2.
marcus
cvs -z3 -q diff
Why was rb changed to rt?
Ilia
On November 15, 2002 06:58 am, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
Thanks, it works.
Attacthed is a slightly modified version of Ilia's patch in consideration
of win32 build.
If there are no objections, I'll commit it.
Moriyoshi
Ilia A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
It's not that I think enabling it is such a bad idea but as we're going for
PHP 5 right after PHP 4.3 anyway I don't think it's too bad to wait for
that. I'm sure lots of people will test PHP 5 RC's so there'll be lots of
testing (long sentence but I
You need to update again to get exif test fixed.
I'll check into getimagesize()
The microtime() fails often but your result seems like there is a 64bit
problem.
marcus
At 14:49 15.11.2002, Sebastian Nohn wrote:
http://www.alkoholbedarf.de/kram/test_report_tru64.zip
Regards,
Sebastian Nohn
No, it's not committed yet.
Both Marcus and me doesn't have access to Zend module.
Moriyoshi
Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wasn't this commited a while ago?
Andi
At 11:58 AM 11/15/2002 +0100, Marcus Börger wrote:
The following patch for bug #19566 is open but should make it into
At 11:14 PM 11/14/2002 -0500, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Andi Gutmans wrote:
It's not that I think enabling it is such a bad idea but as we're going
for
PHP 5 right after PHP 4.3 anyway I don't think it's too bad to wait for
that. I'm sure lots of people will test PHP 5 RC's
Commited.
Andi
At 11:22 PM 11/15/2002 +0900, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
No, it's not committed yet.
Both Marcus and me doesn't have access to Zend module.
Moriyoshi
Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wasn't this commited a while ago?
Andi
At 11:58 AM 11/15/2002 +0100, Marcus Börger
Never mind I did it manually.
Andi
At 03:57 PM 11/15/2002 +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Can you please send the diff as an attachment? I'll apply it.
Thanks,
Andi
At 01:13 PM 11/15/2002 +0100, Marcus Börger wrote:
Here is a patch that hopefully would merge all the dlsym stuff from ZE1.
After
Thanks.
Could you merge the patch into ZE1 also?
Moriyoshi
Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Commited.
Andi
At 11:22 PM 11/15/2002 +0900, Moriyoshi Koizumi wrote:
No, it's not committed yet.
Both Marcus and me doesn't have access to Zend module.
Moriyoshi
Andi Gutmans [EMAIL
At 15:17 15.11.2002, Marcus Börger wrote:
You need to update again to get exif test fixed.
I'll check into getimagesize()
Could you try the following patch:
cvs -z3 -q diff image.c (in directory S:\php4-HEAD\ext\standard)
Index: image.c
Please also update ext/standard/tests/time/001.phpt to shorten your testresult
by some 10thousand lines.
marcus
At 15:38 15.11.2002, you wrote:
At 15:17 15.11.2002, Marcus Börger wrote:
You need to update again to get exif test fixed.
I'll check into getimagesize()
Could you try the
Hey,
Has anyone managed to get php to compile with lcc? It compiles much faster
and therefore is good for development.
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 03:11:10AM -0500, John Coggeshall wrote:
1) I notice that there seems to be a T_LINE token, which should be the
linenumber? However, this never seems
To even come up in the lexer from the zend_highlight() function...
T_LINE is the token for the '__LINE__' constant.
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Börger [mailto:marcus.boerger;t-online.de]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 3:39 PM
To: Sebastian Nohn
Cc: PHP Developers Mailing List
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Test report
At 15:17 15.11.2002, Marcus Börger wrote:
You need to update again to get exif
Sure but ob those i cannot help you now.
marcus
At 17:38 15.11.2002, Sebastian Nohn wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Marcus Börger [mailto:marcus.boerger;t-online.de]
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 3:39 PM
To: Sebastian Nohn
Cc: PHP Developers Mailing List
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV]
Hi,
I was wondering, is PHP in future going to support threading? This would be
a very nice feature.
I'am currently working on this project of mine, a FTP Server build in PHP
which serve MySQL database records. It actually does work very nice, also
multiple clients at the same time. It supports
Nope, that is unlikely to happen. The way to do this correctly is with a
socket_select() anyway.
-Rasmus
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Arjen Brouwer wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering, is PHP in future going to support threading? This would be
a very nice feature.
I'am currently working on this project of
Hi,
I was wondering, is PHP in future going to support threading? This would be a very
nice feature.
I'am currently working on this project of mine, a FTP Server build in PHP which serve
MySQL database records. It actually does work very nice, also multiple clients at the
same time. It
I have a little more info to add. Our DBA opened a question to Sybase
Tech support
and received the following reply:
The tli library was the Sybase network driver on Solaris. Since we had customers facing CR 186487, which arose from Sun Bug 1218173, a request for an interrupt-safe malloc()
I was wondering, is PHP in future going to support threading? This would
be
a very nice feature.
I'am currently working on this project of mine, a FTP Server build in PHP
which serve MySQL database records. It actually does work very nice, also
multiple clients at the same time. It supports
Hi,
I was wondering, is PHP in future going to support threading? This would be a very
nice feature.
I'am currently working on this project of mine, a FTP Server build in PHP which serve
MySQL database records. It actually does work very nice, also multiple clients at the
same time. It
Due to ISP limitations, CVS is not an option.
Where exactly does the bug reside? Does any one know of a work-around?
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.408 / Virus Database: 230 - Release Date: 10/24/2002
--
George Schlossnagle wrote:
I'm a tool. I sent the wrong patch to the list. Thanks to Andrei for
pointing it out. Here is the _right_ patch (finally).
diff -u -3 -r1.53 zend_language_scanner.l
--- zend_language_scanner.l8 Nov 2002 13:40:54 -1.53
+++ zend_language_scanner.l15
On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 19:15, Brian Foddy wrote:
I have a little more info to add. Our DBA opened a question to Sybase
Tech support
and received the following reply:
[...Explanation from Sybase...]
I agree with his assessment that somehow, our root user is getting a
different run path, but
Cool, I will have to try that.
Thanks!!
-Jason
On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 09:11, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Hey,
Has anyone managed to get php to compile with lcc? It compiles much faster
and therefore is good for development.
Andi
--
Jason T. Greene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Development Mailing
Very cool for development but there are a few files which don't quite
compile. I was hoping someone's already played around with it.
Andi
At 04:39 PM 11/15/2002 -0600, Jason T. Greene wrote:
Cool, I will have to try that.
Thanks!!
-Jason
On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 09:11, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Hey,
Hello,
What do you think of that?
Davey propose to have :
open_basedir
session.save_path
upload_tmp_dir
PHP_INI_SYSTEM|PHP_INI_PERDIR.
Regards.
M.CHAILLAN [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hébergement de sites
internets.
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit:
Hey,
I think this patch makes the scanner much more complicated to understand. I
have an idea of a patch which would make it much cleaner although under
very certain cases might be a tad bit less optimized when it comes to the
amount of tokens but it'd save all of the yyless() and push_stacks
Andi Gutmans wrote:
Try it out and let me know how the results are. Also *please* send
diffs also as attachments so that when people apply them we won't get
bad whitespace in our sources.
php-dev seems to eat my attachments
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To
I propose something like the following: (not tested)
It's definitely a sexier patch :)
Andi
RCS file: /repository/ZendEngine2/zend_language_scanner.l,v
retrieving revision 1.62
diff -u -u -r1.62 zend_language_scanner.l
--- zend_language_scanner.l 5 Nov 2002 22:01:35 - 1.62
+++
At 06:23 PM 11/15/2002 -0500, George Schlossnagle wrote:
Andi Gutmans wrote:
Try it out and let me know how the results are. Also *please* send diffs
also as attachments so that when people apply them we won't get bad
whitespace in our sources.
php-dev seems to eat my attachments
That's what I think too so should we close this bug?
M.CHAILLAN Nicolas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.WorldAKT.com Hébergement de sites internets.
- Original Message -
From: Derick Rethans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 12:47 AM
was there discussion about the interaction of __call() and
methods which declaring their arguments as references?
there's no way at present to make this work, as far as i can tell.
seems like it could just be a documented limitation, but i thought
i'd check.
related topic: in the current state of
Much sexier indeed. There are some flaws with it:
o Tokenizes heredocs on whitespace
o Doesn't count lines correctly for debug (since strings now have
newlines in them)
Here's a revised patch to yours that fixes those (heredocs are tokenized
on newlines - I think that is best case)
Andi
I commited it.
Thanks,
Andi
At 06:48 PM 11/15/2002 -0500, George Schlossnagle wrote:
Much sexier indeed. There are some flaws with it:
o Tokenizes heredocs on whitespace
o Doesn't count lines correctly for debug (since strings now have
newlines in them)
Here's a revised patch to yours
Any ideas?
Andi
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 17:14:51 +0100
To: Andi Gutmans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Melvyn Sopacua [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug #14870
X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.00, version=0.7.5
Andi,
could I request your attention for this bug:
56 matches
Mail list logo
