Hi all,
I'm building a PHP extension that I'd like to be able to build both as
fully external and embedded into PHP. I include some apache headers
si I need the build environment to either tell me where apxs is
or have the include directories 'handed to me' in the php-provided
build environment.
James Moore wrote:
With the PHP4 version of Midgard, patching is no longer a necessity.
It's an ordinary extension like the others.
Perhaps it would be an idea to move it out of the main PHP CVS (into another
cvs module) for now and put links on php.net, personally I would really like
Peter "[DiSAStA]" Petermann wrote:
Well right now it won't really solve it because pear is included in the
distribution. However, the idea behind pear is to be something more similar
what if midgard would be handled like php-gtk?
How would that be?
Emile
--
PHP Development Mailing
Andi Gutmans wrote:
OK, my mistake. So moving php4/ext/midgard to php4/pear/midgard would
solve this?
Well right now it won't really solve it because pear is included in the
distribution. However, the idea behind pear is to be something more similar
to CPAN which means both PHP and C
Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
E With the PHP4 version of Midgard, patching is no longer a
E necessity. It's an ordinary extension like the others.
Ah, so parser modifications are out? Good to know.
Yes, they are.
Emile
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe,
Emiliano wrote:
Midgard extension contains 200k of vanity images. This is unreasonable
bloat to the core of PHP. Can you please remove them?
They've been removed days ago.
My mistake, they were removed from our own CVS. We forgot to do that
at cvs.php.net. The mistake has been rectified
Cameron wrote:
i'll agree its about due for release, can we do SOMETHING about the download
size tho? i dont really have any ideas on decent ways to shrink it but it
seems to be bloating to me. could do with the mcrypt fix's and zeev's output
buffer fix 1st tho . . .
Hum, having just
"Thies C. Arntzen" wrote:
We use it a lot. Works well, supports multiple charsets, and is now in
as sane library format so internalizatin isn't strictly necesary
anymore (although there can be reasons to do so all the same, of
course).
Is there anything specific you want to know
"Hellekin O. Wolf" wrote:
Can we propose extensions outside of the main distribution ?
I like the idea of downloading what you want.
Through a form, you would chose the extensions you need, then submit and
receive a custom GZIP or BZ2 file.
It sounds doable. Any constraint, dependency
Wolfgang Drews wrote:
delivering .tar.gz, but in addition offer this .bz2 thing. So
why not, if at least those modem-users would benefit of it?
Could benefit, not would benefit. They'd need to download and install
bzip2
first.
Emile
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Having midgard in the PEAR infrastructure makes sense once the PEAR
infrastructure is such that it is easy to install PEAR components that
include C bits. And yes, perhaps the midgard folks are the right people
to push this along, if they are willing and able.
Someone
Zeev Suraski wrote:
At 02:04 20/3/2001, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
No, we need tighter integration. We want to be able to do something along
the lines of "pear pear.php.net/midgard" and it would go and fetch
the the component, build it and install it.
I completely agree with Andi about this.
James Moore wrote:
This will undoubtedly happen again and again ad midgard and PHP work on
different release cycles and is by no means the fault of the midgard people
but it just isn't practical if we are trying to release stable versions of
PHP and midgard is still undergoing heavy
I'm trying to create a minimal module to do some debugging work, but it
fails to load. I essentially used ext_skel to create an fresh extension,
moved it out of the PHP tree, then did:
$ phpize
$ ./configure --enable-apdebug
$ make
# make install
The extension is generated OK AFAICT, but it
Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
I'm trying to create a minimal module to do some debugging work, but it
fails to load. I essentially used ext_skel to create an fresh extension,
moved it out of the PHP tree, then did:
$ phpize
$ ./configure --enable-apdebug
$ make
# make install
The
Jani Taskinen wrote:
IMAP-2000 ext/imap does not compiles well using phpize because both
PHP_ARG_WITH() in its config.m4.
Why would anyone want to use phpize on imap extension?
(forgive me but I never have needed phpize..)
You do when you want to develop self-contained extensions. SCEs
Jani Taskinen wrote:
So, it means that you never test PHP extensions in SCE mode.
So? I have no use for SCEs.
All the world, fall in line with Jani. Some people do need them.
For PHP too, see package argument earlier.
Emile
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To
Is there any way (with C coding or otherwise) to implement macros a la
#define in C for PHP? I need to have something that looks like a function but
that calls eval in the body, and I need that eval to be executed in the
calling scope. If that's not possible, would it be OK to do something
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
reuse. We can get back to the idea of letting people define % as
htmlspecialchars(),
You can do that in PHP? How?
You can't. You missed the dripping sarcasm.
Well, I was torn between accepting it as sarcasm, and getting hints on
how to accomplish it :)
Is it possible to add a function entry for a C-coded funtion at
runtime?
Emile
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to add a function entry for a C-coded funtion at
runtime?
I once was interested in that and Sascha said it's possible to do that.
It was quite a while back ,so I dunno if recent changes changed also the
situation.
Any pointers into the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
uh, sorry, it was on #php :)
on efnet you mean? I tried there but there wasn't anyone around that
could answer the question. Any particular time/place where the PHP
gurus lounge?
Emile
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
A few questions on Zend internals:
Is it possible to add (opaque, as far as the PHP script will be
concerned) data to object of internal class from C? Preferably, this
data would not even be visible to the script.
I see the class declaration struct has functions that seem to be
related to
23 matches
Mail list logo
