Due to this patch being sent during the msession discussion, it has not
been noticed, so I am resending.
-Jason
---BeginMessage---
Problem
---
There are some scenarios where a function requires the ability to modify
parameters that may also be optional. Optional parameters work well
with the current semantics of not
allowing constants/expressions to pass by reference.
-Jason
On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 10:26, Andi Gutmans wrote:
I don't see any reason to allow passing non-variables by reference.
It is semantically incorrect.
Andi
At 09:40 29/05/2002 +0200, Stig S
Yes and as I said in my argument, this solves some of the problems but
does not solve a non-rightmost parameter being optional.
-Jason
On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 11:43, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Hamster ate my mail? Resent, just in case.
Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
brad lafountain wrote
Even if it is semantically incorrect( which I disagree.)
How is allowing a constant/expression to be passed by reference more
semantically incorrect than allowing a default (which is a constant)
on a pass by reference argument?
-Jason
On Wed, 2002-05-29 at 10:53, Sebastian Bergmann wrote
possible
far reaching effects, I would appreciate someone else taking their time
on a careful review.
I understand if it takes you awhile to get to it
-Jason
Andi
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
If '+' concatenates what does '-' do?
: )
-Jason
On Wed, 2002-06-05 at 09:39, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
The latest one changes some operators.
Nice, but why not overload + for strings to do the concatenation?
Doing that would be ambiguous, to say the least. PHP automatically
framework.
-Jason
On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 07:04, Kristian Koehntopp wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 6. Juni 2002 19:59 schrieb Dan Hardiker:
I sit in many PHP channels (IRC), and observe many class-based
PHP networks (php-classes.org is one I monitor closely) and
can say definatly that the majority of PHP
on a million files.
PEAR is a good example of a framework that ran into a lot of limitations
of the language, which ZE2 will provide a great deal of help in.
-Jason
On Fri, 2002-06-07 at 09:36, Zeev Suraski wrote:
Code reusability is a psychological issue. You can reuse code in PHP 4
Everyone,
I am finally back from vacation, and I will be playing catch-up for a
while.(my email box has over 1000 msgs and I have missed about 1928
php-dev posts, I am sure the equiv CVS posts. )
Please give me some time to catch up.
Thanks,
-Jason
--
PHP Development Mailing List http
Gina,
This list is for the development OF php not with php, please post
questions like these to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Jason
On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 14:17, Planet Internet Nieuws wrote:
I've tried everything I can think of including variations with \t in a
printf(), chr(9), etc. I am trying
James Cox said I should sign up for one, since Rackshack.net is going to be hosting
your new server, and It will be easier to do some serverside admining this way
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Instead of mutexing the entire interpreter to death, why don't you try
creating multiple interpreters (each in a thread), and then come up with
a sharing mechanism.
-Jason
On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 03:57, Alan Knowles wrote:
Im looking at adding threading to php, (for the cgi/cli stuff
On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 08:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 31 Jul 2002, Jason T. Greene wrote:
Instead of mutexing the entire interpreter to death, why don't you try
creating multiple interpreters (each in a thread), and then come up with
a sharing mechanism.
Sounds like duplication
from one thread to another?
Yes, since there are multiple interpreters, they must be synchronized.
(This way they are all allowed to access the POST GET SERVER vars)
-Jason
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
structures (arrays, objects) could use serialization.
-Jason
--Wez.
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Doesn't this currently work without your patch?
-Jason
On Thu, 2002-08-08 at 02:49, Alan Knowles wrote:
this efree needs removing..
+
+efree(*call_name);
+DEBUG_OUT(done call_user function\n
Ok, I will take a look at that. Thanks for the patch, class callbacks
were actually on my todo list. I just haven't had much time to work on
php lately, but I will work on merging it with the following features:
ticks back-end replacement
system call interruption ability
-Jason
On Mon, 2002
* send patches
* open bug reports
* close bug reports : )
Thanks,
-Jason
On Wed, 2002-09-11 at 17:34, Brian Lalor wrote:
Jason Greene [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This extension does not belongs in PECL. It is fully platform
compatible, all other languages offer this functionality
issues with the sockets extension in this area, email
me and I will fix them. Also, if you have come up with, or are planning
on making patches in this area, I would gladly accept them : )
Thanks,
-Jason
Thanks!
Hans
__
Do you
October 2002 19:23, Jason T. Greene wrote:
If for some reason we HAVE to have a symmetrical bogus unsigned left
shift operator, and we completely disagree with my arguments on
overloading the HEREDOC operator, then we can implement , =,
. = as the unsigned shift operators
buy a book.
-Jason
--
Jason T. Greene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 17:10, Alan Rawkins wrote:
Hi there,
I'm wondering if there is a way to attach a php function to an html a href
tag. I basically want to have a button, that when clicked
... then let's not put in the nonsense operator, and just have
three shift operations: , , and .
I agree
- D
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Development Mailing List http://www.php.net/
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
-Jason
--
Jason T. Greene [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, 2002-10-30 at 13:26, Andi Gutmans wrote:
I think you guys have convinced me that having only isn't too bad
Great, I really think this is the way to go!
(Jason will kill me now)
/me kills Andi
Just kidding, I am just glad we can come to an agreement, so I can start
working on a patch
Ok,
I hereby volunteer to update the documentation to clearly explain
shifting (with examples).
-Jason
On Wed, 2002-10-30 at 14:05, James Cox wrote:
We're going to walk into a confusion where people will expect to work
too, and get bitten. We have to be really careful that we explain
Why not just convert to using a long? Is there really a need to have 2
numeric types in the ini system?
-Jason
On Mon, 2002-11-11 at 00:20, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Hi,
How about changing the INI_ENTRY macros in debug mode to check if we're
using UpdateInt/UpdateLong and if so check if sizeof
.
-Jason
On Mon, 2002-11-11 at 10:42, Jason T. Greene wrote:
Why not just convert to using a long? Is there really a need to have 2
numeric types in the ini system?
-Jason
On Mon, 2002-11-11 at 00:20, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Hi,
How about changing the INI_ENTRY macros in debug mode
Cool, I will have to try that.
Thanks!!
-Jason
On Fri, 2002-11-15 at 09:11, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Hey,
Has anyone managed to get php to compile with lcc? It compiles much faster
and therefore is good for development.
Andi
--
Jason T. Greene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Development Mailing
Right, it seems like you are looking for sapi/embed,
Take a look at this email
http://www.zend.com/lists/php-dev/200209/msg01063.html
Thanks,
Jason Shees, CCNA, MCSE
Exploratory Team Lead
-Original Message-
From: Fernando Serboncini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February
301 - 328 of 328 matches
Mail list logo
