Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5 mailing list

On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Andrey Hristov wrote: > Dan, > on http://news.php.net php.version5.dev is listed (12 messages so far in the > archive). Except that you can't get articles on it :-) Derick -- - Derick Rethans

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5 mailing list

Dan, on http://news.php.net php.version5.dev is listed (12 messages so far in the archive). Andrey - Original Message - From: "Dan Kalowsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PHP Development Mailing list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 1

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5 mailing list

I am very happy that the mailing-list tab on the PHP main web site doesn't include it yet. I'd prefer only people who are active in the developer's community (i.e. php-dev, php-qa) to be part it. Was there ever a discussion of introducing a more formal organisation into the development pro

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5 mailing list

At 03:22 PM 2/3/2003 -0500, Dan Kalowsky wrote: To all concerned, I would like to request that yet again the PHP5 mailing list be made public and no longer kept private. Given that comments in the past few hours have centered around the existence of the mailing list, it seems rather absurd to co

[PHP-DEV] PHP 5 mailing list

To all concerned, I would like to request that yet again the PHP5 mailing list be made public and no longer kept private. Given that comments in the past few hours have centered around the existence of the mailing list, it seems rather absurd to continue the secrecy notion. To those who will say

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5 - when?

Hi Piotr, The short answer is that it will be ready when it is ready :) We don't have a definite time frame for PHP 5 (we are not 100% sure what features it will contain), and probably won't have a definite time frame until we begin the release cycle (typically a month or more before we release t

[PHP-DEV] PHP 5 - when?

Hi, First of all - I hope I post to the right group. I could not find any righter group for my question Can somebody tell me when the version 5 of PHP will be released? Can I find such plans at some website? Like: "We plan to release version 4.3 in march, and then the version 5 about may" ? I as

[PHP-DEV] PHP 5 Features

Hi I'd like to have a look on the new features in PHP 5.0 because I need to evaluate different technologies for a new big website. I ask: PHP 5.0 or JSP, what's better? Can you give me some information, links or documents? Thank you! - Mickey from Switzerland --- Dipl. Ing. Inf. Michael Heu

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5

Hi, > > Always building the CGI version would also help the PEAR command > > line installer a lot since it currently needs a PHP binary to be > > executed. > > Yes, I had that in mind. We should get /usr/bin/php on as many machines as > possible. > This message from Stig S. Bakken summarises nice

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5

Creating a CLI sapi module w/o all of the CGI crap is extremely easy. What might be more challenging is fixing the build so that it always builds the cli. Then again I don't really know because I don't know the whole build system too well. Andi -- PHP Development Mailing List

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5

Hello, Martin Jansen wrote: > > On Wed, 2 Jan 2002 14:43:39 +0100, Edin Kadribasic wrote: > > >The build process should be altered so that the standalone interpreter (cgi > >sapi) is always built so the traditional make && make install installs > >/usr/bin/php no matter what sapi module was cho

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5

> >The build process should be altered so that the standalone interpreter (cgi > >sapi) is always built so the traditional make && make install installs > >/usr/bin/php no matter what sapi module was chosen. > > I'm +1 on this, even though I think that PHP isn't very well suited > for shell jobs i

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5

> >The build process should be altered so that the standalone interpreter (cgi > >sapi) is always built so the traditional make && make install installs > >/usr/bin/php no matter what sapi module was chosen. > > I'm +1 on this, even though I think that PHP isn't very well suited > for shell jobs i

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5

On Wed, 2 Jan 2002 14:43:39 +0100, Edin Kadribasic wrote: >The build process should be altered so that the standalone interpreter (cgi >sapi) is always built so the traditional make && make install installs >/usr/bin/php no matter what sapi module was chosen. I'm +1 on this, even though I think

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5

+1 Edin Kadribasic wrote: >I know that PHP is mainly used for developing web-based applications, but I >think that it has a great potential as a general purpose scripting language. >Even when developing web applications I often find necessary to make command >line scripts for maintenance and bat

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5

I know that PHP is mainly used for developing web-based applications, but I think that it has a great potential as a general purpose scripting language. Even when developing web applications I often find necessary to make command line scripts for maintenance and batch operations. One of our goals

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5

Manuel Lemos wrote: > Good suggestion! Thanks. > I bet your next suggestion is to add thread creation that works under > Unix and Windows! Hm, no. -- Sebastian Bergmann http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/ Did I help you? Consider a gift: http://w

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5

Hello, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: > > Andi Gutmans wrote: > > I think we should have a discussion of what other things besides the > > scripting engine we'd like to change for PHP 5. > > I think an important issue would be to make extensions thread-safe, > where possible. > > configure sh

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5

Andi Gutmans wrote: > I think we should have a discussion of what other things besides the > scripting engine we'd like to change for PHP 5. I think an important issue would be to make extensions thread-safe, where possible. configure should be modified to throw warnings if non thread-safe

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5

At 07:24 PM 1/1/2002 +0100, Georg Richter wrote: >Although we're planning > > on only move the unimportant extensions out of PHP I still think it should > > be extremely easy to get a list of available extensions (maybe even a part > > of the ./configure process) and to easily download/configure/i

Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5

Although we're planning > on only move the unimportant extensions out of PHP I still think it should > be extremely easy to get a list of available extensions (maybe even a part > of the ./configure process) and to easily download/configure/install them. Please could you explain "unimportant" ?!

[PHP-DEV] PHP 5

Hey, The Zend Engine 2 has made lots of progress. I think we should have a discussion of what other things besides the scripting engine we'd like to change for PHP 5. I know there was talk on deprecating some stuff such as old-style function names, moving extensions to PECL etc.. I think it's a