I agree that it should be kept on php-dev. That's the most efficient
way of reaching everyone that will be affected.
- Stig
Andi Gutmans wrote:
>
> I suggest keeping it on php-dev.
> All of the build stuff has been done by php-dev in the past as build/PECL
> related discussions really are php
I suggest keeping it on php-dev.
All of the build stuff has been done by php-dev in the past as build/PECL
related discussions really are php-dev.
It also means that php-dev won't be allowed to cut themselves out of what's
happening with PECL and it won't lead to some php-dev ppl who don't
subs
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 08:09:10PM +0100, Martin Jansen wrote:
> >I suggest we move PECL either to its own mailing list or to php-dev.
>
> +1 for it's own mailing list. Additionally we could perhaps set up
> an own CVS module for PECL. (Currently it resides in /pear/PECL.)
> Guys?
I think I agr
On Wed, 02 Jan 2002 20:39:44 +0200, Andi Gutmans wrote:
>However, if PECL doesn't become everything we hoped for within the next few
>months (possible) I don't think it should stop PHP 5. We could always have 5.1.
At least we could have PHP 6 right after 5 :-).
>Anyway, that's not too importan
